rainbowcrab95772
14942
477
49
Jul 30, 2026 4:38 PM
rainbowcrab95772
14942
477
49
00110001001110010011100000110100
Not sure following the bear into the woods would be the best solution but is certainly one.
NaughtButOne
RamboGram
https://deflock.org/
ragekritz
is that an ai smokey
Pistolstar86
They use flocks to hunt us down. They aren't going to like it when we do that to them
drums4lyfe
Flock around and find out!
theowlofthegame
Sure, but if a murder or happens, first thing that the police do is ask for images…
Illendor
Sacrificing privacy for security rarely works..
And in fact, pretty much every single instance of large surveillance networks in use to day have been abused by the authorities. Most recently the massive amount of evidence where police were stalking specific people for personal, usually nefarious reasons.
Having nothing to hide has not saved anyone thus far.
Righteousdew
Fuck AI slop, and fuck you for posting it.
DatDarthCaedus
The irony of posting AI pictures to protest mass surveillance, which is increasingly using AI for organization, analysis, shitty facial recognition, etc.
They may not be the same types of AI tools, but they come from the same group of companies and individuals. Every bit helps normalize the use of AI and helps them get resources and saturation to push it further.
Stop fucking helping them.
19marcurious57
While you're at it; get rid of all 'smart' appliances in and around your houses and cars too. Start there, right NOW!
mangoinparis
My car still has windows you need to role up manually.
Roqinn
They just added a new one along the route I take to work. It is in a fairly lit area out in the open and in front of the prison. Still tempted....
Blackmetalhappiness
I both admire, and applaud those who take action against mass surveillance
HandoB4Javert
Thanks Smokey!
wantednokes
circular saw is faster
jimhotep
This pleases jimhotep.
Righteousdew
AI slop pleases you?
jimhotep
That is your inference. If you cant figure out what pleases me about this then we have no need to firther discuss.
Righteousdew
That's a whole lot of words to say you like AI slop.
theoriginalgiga
https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1Z3hocjUzNzhscDdnZ3AzN2lyenhzczJhdWczNDQwdndkcjA5em56aiZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/1ykhYvBQkbkQnEkwuy/200w.webp
HandoB4Javert
theoriginalgiga
Thanks Smoky!
Ooti
They make commercials one that can burn out cameras
v
TungstenOrbital
Where would one theoretically buy this, so I know to avoid it?
Silent1fd
Can't, you would need to build it yourself.
Nephelus
What specific URL would I need to add to my parental filter so that my totally real children would never find the instructions?
Silent1fd
Well Styropyro builds it here... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBVlL0FNbSE
RAJrios
Hey, your name isn't by any chance related to a scene from a live-action G.I. Joe movie, is?
TungstenOrbital
No
RAJrios
Yeah, that seemed unlikely. Which science fantasy IP is it referencing? XD
bippityboppitybuttsex
Fun Fact, Flock executives routinely use the system to spy on children... cops use them to stalk women.
Texas uses them to hunt women who might have left the state for healthcare.
RummageSaleBubbler
"Feature" /s
wagnus
VagrantKoba
There has been one documented case of it yo spy on children. So not really routinely. Stop using disinformation
BeaverOnFire
Not one you say? Huh. Must have been a fever dream. 🤔 https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/flock-safety-employees-watched-kids-151737512.html
bippityboppitybuttsex
They were saying there only the one case and I shouldn't portray that as standard behavior of people that built a system to spy on Americans... who are probably totes honorable and would never do something immoral, twice.
bippityboppitybuttsex
I am willing to bet that Flock goes to extreme lengths to keep their misdeeds private... if there is one instance (in this case actually two, one of them spying on children in gym class and swimming), I can assure you there are dozens more.
There are 40+ public cases of cops using flock to stalk women and one public case of TX hunting women who sought healthcare.
Defending flock is not the flex you think it is.
VagrantKoba
One (1) case is not ROUTINELY. you can bet all you want and I wouldn't disagree with you, but the fucking fact remains you are outright lying. Do you know what the word "routinely" means or do you think it is just an adjective meaning "many" attacking something is fine, but fucking be honest about it. If you are willing to lie about 1 thing then the chances are you could be lying about the rest.
bippityboppitybuttsex
Do you seriously think we know 1/10th of the misdeeds being done here?
VagrantKoba
Knowing the misdeeds has nothing to do with the conversation. Routinely means to do on a schedule as a standard process. You have no evidence of that so you can't say it. think of it this way. The cops find evidence that you once looked at horse porn images (redirect link) by your logic as they can't know all your misdeeds but tell the court that you routinely watch horse porn. The facts of Flock are bad enough just stick with them.