CapttainKillJoy
2490
130
28
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy getting fact checked in real time by one of the authors of the New York Times' story.
Oct 3, 2019 2:55 AM
CapttainKillJoy
2490
130
28
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy getting fact checked in real time by one of the authors of the New York Times' story.
enheru
McCarthy's such a dumb sack of shit.
wheeledPhoto
The Republican propaganda machine is in full swing. The number of untruths being propagated is astronomical.
idontliketheclonebone
Find the lie that seems to stick then scream it from the mountaintops. They're just trying to find that one lie they need
rufelineme
Nyt got the Russia hoax wrong for years. Retractions left and right and you’re gonna trust THEM? Right
TheRealArclight
https://imgur.com/D9MuiDI
TheRealAlpharius
What part do you think was a hoax?
ImNotDumbIJustPlayOne
What part was a hoax? Oh, and, what’s your opinion on the obstruction by the GOP?
rfinclude
The fact a news outlet is willing to make retractions makes them more trustworthy.
nutsacrilegious
I'm sure this will turn out so much differently from that whole Russian collusion thing. Also hahaha I'm not.
glaug
You mean proven in a long and damning report?
CapttainKillJoy
You mean where it was prove. That Russia interfered in the election, Trump cooperated and committed 10 acts of obstruction?
TheRealArclight
this only proves the whole russian collusion thing......
Stinkleberg
Democrats have this on a silver platter, but they can still bungle it. Never doubt the Democrats’ ability to bungle.
TheRealAlpharius
ImNotDumbIJustPlayOne
Gold
TheRealArclight
https://imgur.com/D9MuiDI
Dargan
No. This is what we need to avoid. We need to be better than this. We can’t grow if we always insult and antagonize, neither side will learn
glaug
Would you apply that to our relationship with, say, ISIS?
Dargan
You’re comparing a group of authoritarian violent religious extremists with primitive social ideals with.... wait a minute
Dargan
But in all seriousness, villainizing and hating someone you disagree with is less likely to promote discussion than it is more animosity
TheRealAlpharius
Extremely relevant.
n3ckr0mantic
FOX shot down a pro-trump spin..? DOGS AND CATS LIVING TOGETHER -- MASS HYSTERIA
CapttainKillJoy
Yep
[deleted]
[deleted]
CapttainKillJoy
Please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm please be sarcasm...
TheRealAlpharius
It was lol they're sane.
TheRealAlpharius
[deleted]
[deleted]
TheRealAlpharius
The transcript of him comparing himself to Lincoln is AMAZING.
FourScoreAndSevenBeersAgo
Cringe
limerind
his staff coordinated to guide whistleblower to next steps (including dem insider lawyer). diff between that and "orchestration" is trivial
TheRealArclight
https://imgur.com/D9MuiDI
TheRealAlpharius
His staff told the whistleblower to follow the law, and you consider that "orchestration?"
DrForester
To be fair, telling someone to follow the law would be a strange and foreign thing to a trump cultist.
TheRealAlpharius
limerind
woof, better do some yoga to bend over that far backwards to twist the reporting.
TheRealAlpharius
Literally just repeating your comment back to you.
limerind
tell me, what role should the house intelligence committee chair have in being a procedural FAQ for potential whistlebowers?
GinoTheIntern
Well, if a whistleblower approaches them, what would you rather they say?
TheRealAlpharius
None, they should tell them to follow the law and go to the next steps of the whistleblower process... which is what you just said they did.
FourScoreAndSevenBeersAgo
He wasn't. The whistle blower came to schiff's staff. Not him. They did it because they knew they couldn't go to anyone in the white house.