Oop

Mar 13, 2023 10:58 PM

zoraniko

Views

93220

Likes

1255

Dislikes

24

https://www.kcra.com/amp/article/california-ab-935-no-tobacco-sales-born-after-2006/43049994

Won't older folks just start selling it to younger folks? Congrats you've recreated the concept of dealers.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Coming soon, tobacco cartels

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Should have happened 6 years ago... 1999 vs 2000 is easy on ID's

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

On one hand, good, on the other, I would still like to buy cigars and pipe tobacco. Good thing I’m born after 2007

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Do you mean before 2007?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I did yeah lol

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh good the youth will smoke out of sheer spite now.... ugh

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fast google search here 600+ chemicals, when burned creat 7000+ chemicals. 69+ known to cause cancer. literal 0 health benefits. Nov 17 2022

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Why would anyone want to create more generations of smokers when its literal poison and self caused addiction. literally burning your money

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The answer is becuase someone benefits from it. Also when the population has less money they get more disperate to take shittier jobs. cycle

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But I wouldn't want to disappoint all those tobacco companies that spent all that money to convince me smoking is cool and good for me.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because this worked so well for pot, and alcohol, and everything else that’s been ban. i’m a for banning smoking in public places, and >

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

laws about second hand smoke around minors even at home. but a blanket ban on tobacco is a bad idea, it’s wrong, and it should not have any>

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

better image in the public eye than a ban on pot or on alcohol. it’s an adult’s right to poison themselves if they want.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah I don’t see how this is different than the war on drugs, which everyone now calls to legalize and tax

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Banning vice is a slippery slope. This should be up to the individual and not the government. Beer, soda, corn syrup, meat...

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I mean... use of Corn syrup should probably be regulated much more heavily especially in commercial products.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Seems like a good way to usher in a generation of republican voters…

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Isn’t Australia or New Zealand doing this already?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They have already done this in New Zealand.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Pfft tobacco companies won't give a shit. Vapes are their preferred nicotine delivery system now - and the kids are all over that shit.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How do the indigenous feel about this?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If this were Arkansas, I would just assume they're trying to do away with the child labor smoking breaks.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, who could possibly support the elimination of tax funding from the sale of... poison.

3 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 6

If it's literally just tobacco and water, like American spirits or Winston, fine. But we don't need 34 flavors of Marlboro.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, how would we fund health programs to fix the problems that said poison created? Do they know the benefits of revolving door programs?

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Because, at least in the south, any budget issues were fixed by raising nicotine taxes

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Oh, I thought they fixed the budget by eliminating education.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Fuck tobacco, we got weed

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is a tough one, on one hand I hate the smell and ruined dinner nights from second hand smoke, but at the same time I enjoy alcohol and

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I know there is nothing good about it for me. So it’s hard to support this and know how don’t want alcohol or other drugs banned

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're doing something like that in NZ. Smoking is bad but I don't know what to think of laws like that.

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

It's extremely effective. Teen smoking has halved in just a few years, and there isn't much of a black market in NZ.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's not something like that, it's exactly that. Before California.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Well I didn't know the particulars.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No worries. just think NZ should get full credit for legislation

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Cigarettes are quite literally money up in smoke

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 8

Its amazing that most here won't judge someone for their chosen pronouns, sexual pref. or abortion stance but when it comes to smoking......

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Smoking hurts everyone

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

a couple of butthurt smokers

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

food is literally money is shit. drink is literally money in piss.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

fuck.. mistyped the first in as is...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Except for the whole creating energy and allowing you to... y'know... live

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

The obvious difference really is you'll die if you don't eat or drink. That's what the money is for, not dying.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

You, sir, are not just a clown; you are the entire circus. If you do not drink, you die. If you do not eat, you die. Not so for smoking.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Because making things illegal has worked well in the past. S/ please see prohibition. also the war on drugs

3 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 22

Yeah, look at all the illegal trade in asbestos and lead paint.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

So your argument is we should have no laws because making things illegal does nothing? This isn't prohibition or the war on drugs. It bans

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

OH SO YOU'RE SAYING THEY SHOULD GIVE BABIES THE DEATH PENALTY UNLESS THEY SMOKE??? BUH BUH BUH?! You hysterical big government dope.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

the sale, not the possession.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

Tobacco taxes mean the state has a vested interest in supporting tobacco sales.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

Gotta break the cycle

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except now they have Marijuana taxes to take its place!

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Good point, but it's only a problem if they are both trying to reduce use and maintain tax income.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How the tables will turn, weed smokers will be free to partake, while tobacco users will have to go to their local dealer for dime bags.

3 years ago | Likes 371 Dislikes 5

It’s just a bill. It’s not a law, unlikely to be one either. I hate smoke. I would like to see it entirely illegal.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We live in strange times.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Honestly, the weed smokers can fuck off as well, that shit smells worse than the cigarettes.

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 35

The smell doesn’t stick around like tobacco though. Plus, unlike cigarettes, people don’t chain smoke joints (normally)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It sticks around worse than cigs, and carries further.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's actually NOT that hip to be a square.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Giant ziploc baggie of cigs from your closest reservation!

3 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

I see you Tanis

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No one who is a legal age smoker will be denied until they die

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

...and then there's always cremation

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except that over time less places will bother to purchase/stock them because it won't be worth it.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But that's over the course of 20-50 years

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Are you sad for smokers or tobacco companies? Lots of things get phased out over time.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tobacco isn't going anywhere. It has a huge international market

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 3

A cigarette smoker will light up a dozen times a day. A pot smoker with a job is going to wait for home. Less cigs = less cancer.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

I'm 'working' from home, so I can light up when I like :)

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

some sure. But plenty of people would/do smoke on the job depending on the position.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Haaaaaaa

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Plus there’s edibles. I guess the cigarette equivalent is chewing tobacco? Even that is more cancerous.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

As someone who quit smoking last month after 25 years of trying, I support the sentiment. But you're making them cool again by banning them.

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

I quit 18 years ago. My hatred of smoking is off the charts. I cannot stand the smell. It's such a selfish habit.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They aren’t shown in movies or shows anymore, nobody glorifies it, it’ll be a niche rebellion that kids can’t afford

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

This is so crazy naive. Also, bizarre to discount the thousands of older movies that will continue to exist that will eternally glorify it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Stay strong, it will soon get better! First 3-4 weeks were the worst or me, quickly got easier after that.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

The only thing that ever worked was vaping, so that's my full time job now. At least I smell like pineapple

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Just like Spongebob!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's all about breaking habits. About forbidding will make it cool: the vape stuff does that, too - best to nip it in the bud right now IMO.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nah, it's all about vaping these days (in my country at least). Hardly anyone under 25 uses cigarettes.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine being a smoker born in 2005, you'll get carded for the rest of your life.? But seriously, IMO it's a fair way to phase out tobacco.

3 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 14

They don't care about fair. They only care about pushing their own agenda.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 87

Im confused by this on many levels. What is a politicians job, if not to push an “agenda”? They just randomly pick stuff to support?

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

You support less regulation of tobacco then?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

They're responding to the "They don't care about fair. They only care about pushing their own agenda." comment

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I don't smoke cigars. But if you take away my right to purchase one we're going to have issues.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 29

You realize that's not a right? You literally do not have the right to buy whatever you want. It doesn't exist.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

I've never heard something so painfully American

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you're already old enough to purchase tobacco, this won't affect you.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Who else's agenda would they push?

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Mine. They should push MY agenda. The one to start training new smokers NOW, by giving them cigarettes while they're still in the womb. /S

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah, yes. The agenda of protecting future generations from *squints* addiction and lung cancer.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Don't understand the resentment. As an ex smoker, nothing will be lost by not getting new people hooked on this shitty addiction.

3 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 4

As a current smoker, nothing will be lost by not getting new people hooked on this shitty addiction.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1