sleeperkid
6819
513
10
Aug 14, 2026 5:01 PM
sleeperkid
6819
513
10
ThailandExpress
you dont understand, she is a woman of color! Therefore Evil -MAGA probably
OperatorWay
StarscreamAndHutch
Calls a reporter piggy, shits herself in the oval office causing press conferences to get halted, puts her name in the Kennedy Center, is in love with putin and bibi…
justheretocommentonce
And nobody does anything of merit.
You guys are really fucking weird.
Try that in EU, you'll be apprehended, tried, and straight to jail.
Although the France's former president's attache did pay to essentially rape Croatian girls. And keeps doing it. Pay for sex, beat them to half-death.
VictorDenn
The 2A wackjobs would have found the will to revolt.
mrthewhitee
I wouldn't say it would have been "so good", more like "so status quo"
getoffmycloud
wouldn’t it be top gender equality in a weird kinda way?)
celestedrake
If they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all.
Btweezer
Good point. To say there is a double standard and that donnie never pays the price, would be a severe understatement.
Justminutesago
They don’t care that he’s a criminal as long as he’s THEIR criminal
DukePhelan
I am personally all if favor or running around the country rounding up the red hats to put them all into camps. Just 'until we can figure out what the hell is going on' of course.
bingotown
Fox News doesn’t tell their viewers about anything bad Trump has done. Meanwhile, if Kamala did all this, even very left wing media would be all over her and reporting everything. The sides are not equal.
VulpesIncendium
Yeah, but don't you understand? Their guy did all this, so it means they're winning!
huffnpuff72
Imagine if Biden, or some other old white dude had done it, let alone a mixed race woman.
amundost
Different standards, in short high standard for good people and double standard for bad people...
UncleMeaty
Maybe that's why they love Trump. He never laughs. Have you ever seen Donald Trump laugh? No, you haven't.
bippityboppitybuttsex
She would not have, no Democrat would have because even corporate Democrats still believe in the rule of law and not actively harming the American people.
At the end of the day even pieces of shit like Chuck Schumer and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz still believe in civilization and the US as a moral leader of the world (well, at least for Americans, YMMV based on skin color outside the US).
TemporarilyEmbarrassedThousandaire
But she was shrill :( and she made men voters feel scolded :((
KingHippie
What?
TemporarilyEmbarrassedThousandaire
Somehow there's something about my face that made multiple men feel comfortable telling me they didn't want to vote for Harris because her ads sounded like she was scolding them, this is my historical marker to those men
KingHippie
WTF. I just cant understand it. Why do these men haye women so much?
TemporarilyEmbarrassedThousandaire
Unclear, and they didn't seem to want to learn about tone policing
forelle
The media would treat her worse if she had worn a tan suit.
But the Dems under her would have been pretty unpopular by now, because their policies are Republican light and the people crave for some real change. Electability is a myth as demonstrated by countless progressive candidates. Electable is who gets elected.
RawBlow
“Pretty unpopular” Kamala sounds real fucking peachy right about now.
forelle
Was she in office? You are aware you're reacting to an hypothetical right now. The unpopular Trump I was also seen as "real fucking peachy" after the Biden term and look where he is now. We are talking about the ebb and flow of popularity as politicians are in office here. Compare that to Zoran Mamdani, he got only more popular during his term. If you want to fix this country, you should start letting people run for office who are actually working for the people and not for the old structures.
canigifinpaint
I'm always amazed that these never include the 500,000 dead children after USAID was cut. That should be attached to Trump and Elon FOREVER.
jtxyz
That's just an estimated implied statistic.
"Due to not receiving aid, we figure that this many kids died."
It's way too abstract and removed from the budget cuts for anyone to give enough of a shit about it to actually make a difference.
Maga wouldn't care if trump had heard 500k kids directly into the orphan crushing machine on live tv. Ain't no way stats like this make a blip.
canigifinpaint
https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-shutdown-has-led-to-hundreds-of-thousands-of-deaths/
VictusVonGuyver
And that estimate is out of the 762,000 attributed deaths. We know the figures are likely higher. Cutting USAID was very much a death sentence by starvation and every Republican supporting this was all too eager.
This also destroyed billions of dollars to American farmers who relied on this to keep their farms afloat.
Dezri
It is technically, but he's done so much else that was horrible already, that we know about, that this is kind of a drop in the bucket. Also it was early days for him and things have only gone up from there.
I mean look at his latest money laundering scandal. It's barely made the news. And honestly I can't even say I'm surprised. What else did people expect from a man convicted of 34 counts of fraud BEFORE the election?
And none of that touches the stuff that people suspect, and can't prove.
[deleted]
[deleted]
becuzz04
Fair. But 500,000 dead children should never be a drop in the bucket. That level of mass murder should never be a footnote.
Dezri
You are right. It's just that the list of his crimes is so long and horrendous that I'm becoming numb.