Is that for just one year or what

May 5, 2026 5:52 AM

It literally says inheritance, so once.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in America they'd buy 5 million in turnip's crypto and cons in congress would fall over themselves passing a law changing the inheritance rate. but they've already done that so they don't need to.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They had $8B on hand but will inevitably complain about being cash poor at some point.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IIRC the inheritance tax in South Korea is 50% and there was no way they could ever pay that. So they found “disappeared” while they negotiated with the government to settle on a payable amount. Otherwise they would have had to sell half the company worth hundreds of billions.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 oh Samsungs has its own Portion of shit going on, they control south Korea from the shadows

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess it's a one time thing, based on the fact that people generally only die once and not every year.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In America they'd hire 1000 lawyers and pay them $9 billion to avoid $8 billion in taxes.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The king of the netherlands doesn't pay tax and has an "uitkering" in the millions. He also doesn't get inheritance tax. And people are super okay with this.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was thinking that doesn't seem a lot for such a huge company, but the family is only worth $45 billion last year. And the tax is for their worth in 2020, when they were worth $26 billion. So that is a decent amount of tax.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In America, they bribe judges to pass laws to allow the loopholes

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also American billionaires: "we just won't die, to avoid this disgusting tax.!

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No great fortune was ever created ethically; it's either luck or evil actions.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Samsung did not want to pay that, they fought it hard

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They also did a lot of very sketchy stuff. And they are also basically a part of the government.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Inheritance taxes are stupid to begin with, just make them pay tax on the income like the rest of us. I say this because when my parents pass, they'll leave me 12 acres in a northern Wisconsin tourist town. That property is valued at about $500k now and I can't afford the tax now, let alone 10+ years in the future. Im not pro-rich asshole, I'm "anti-going broke because the powers that be make all the rules and will take the property if I dont pay their bribe". 1/

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, no, I can't just sell it with an outstanding tax bill that large. Its not illegal, but no one will buy it and then have to pay the tax and judges up in deep red Morontown, WI, won't let me slide till after its sold, under current law. And my parents are idiots and won't put in in a proper trust or add my name to the deed when the bought it 15 years ago.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean the Samsungs view the SK government coffers as their personal slush fund. Don't mistake this as integrity.

2 months ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 3

there's also very substantiated rumors that they hire thugs to enforce their desires. The TV show Lost took that as plot inspiration

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My impression is that Samsung and Hyundai is the South Korean government.

2 months ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Yup, recommend others to read up on SK's chaebols and their hold on the government and businesses across the country. Also the history ad how it got to that point.

2 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Also a US corp would gladly play 100 million in fees and lawyers to avoid paying a 2 million fine, to set a precident that they can't be charged for that one thing.

2 months ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Buying Congress is a heck of a lot cheaper than 100mm.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

there is no precedent for a samsung in the us, maybe standard oil, but that doesn’t really capture the deference the government their gives the company and family

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They are trying to get rid of the inheritance tax in Finland. The argument is that the shares of a company are worth more than the liquid cash inherited so they would have to sell part of the company to cover the tax. Why not just tax the shares when they are sold, if that's the problem? They have all the broke people defending these near-billionaires and billionaires, too.

2 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

It’s their duty as citizens to sell shares to cover. If they would like not to pay taxes, reinvesting in their company and employees is their only path to that goal.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it's a problem they came up with to justify the solution they already had in mind. They're not actually interested in other ways to solve it, and if their sob story about needing to sell their hard earned company doesn't get them anywhere (either because it gets debunked as complete bullshit like their previous attempts or another solutions wins out) they'll just pivot to trying another angle of attack on the inheritance tax.

2 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This is the worst government Finland has ever had and it is not even close. Capitalist pigs and fascists hand in hand eroding our society. If I didn't have kids I think I would've already done an Eugen Schauman.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, well … why not make them sell part of the company? Or pay it over time? Money isn’t even fucking real! We are all so, so, so stupid (as a collective).

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like, for fucking real, though, why should a child be allowed to inherit a business? Inheritance is literally the fucking reason the system was able to devour itself. It was designed with the intent of eliminating this. Inheritance of more than personal effects should be banned entirely.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you mean, "one year"? It's an _inheritance_ tax.

2 months ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 0

So, like, every other year?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to be fair, he did phrase that as a question, so, just saying 'no, that's a single time inheritance tax' would have sufficed

2 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

They die every year and are replaced with the new model.

2 months ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0