keep it up

Jan 13, 2021 5:27 PM

https://uproxx.com/viral/nyc-cancels-contract-trump-org-insurrectionists/

Some folks wanted a "business "man"" and when they got one... shock! A lying, cheating, narcissistic, vague language abusing fool. Yup bm

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Goddammit imgur has never been so full of sources, love it

5 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 1

Gotta pull that trump card

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One of the clauses was that he host a national tournament. Oh wait, the PGA just barred him FOR LIFE from hosting any.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cannabis is gonna bring in way more money than Trump.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Everything about the Trump family needs to be cancelled, then burnished into history as the textbook definition of losers.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

We are on that track. Donnie isn't going to be able to do anything but stare at a wall soon

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Trump says he hates NY anyways....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Whenever I see this gif I always mean to ask what's got him so amused? I don't think I've seen the whole thing in context before.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/5lfSeWhVWa8 there ya go

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you kind person. Greenshirtguy!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He has completely destroyed what is left of the Trump brand. Kinda like his businesses in steaks, casinos, vodka, etc...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why didn’t they do it before? Wasn’t the orange turd supposed to divest from his businesses?

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

Probably not enough ground. Now they have a solid one.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The real question is why should this cancellation even affect him? He said he was divested....was he lying?! Say it ain’t so

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

This.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Look how tiny his hands are!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nice start!

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Should have stopped when trump was running out of principle/ emoluments.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

fuck trump

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I think it’s $30 million actually.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe he'll hear that!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Read the TOS, Don.

5 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 2

v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whoa, how insensitive! Everyone knows he can't read!

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

You lost him at "Read"

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

This is how capitalism should work

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

His hands really do look tiny there.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Really annoying that in the U.K. the news keeps calling it riots. Call it what it was.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Anyone else find it weird that there were contracts in place with a sitting president in the first place? How does that one square?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Lookit dem lil gloves.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

He broke the law, it got him banned, him glove to big for he got dam hand!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was looking for this - his hands look so teeny tiny. HAHA

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Kudos NY, kudos!

5 years ago | Likes 406 Dislikes 10

?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I miss this guy

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

A Promised Land is great. Read/Listen to it if you can.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

About fkn time de Blasio did something of merit.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Can we just be honest about two things. One hes going to "Sell"/rename his businesses. Two unless he goes to prison. He won't care

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Have to shift to multiple shell companies to run proxy deals through, any of the places dropping him gets a whiff of his involvement 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

in a transaction they'll likely drop it again, making the entire setup useless. Heh, he'd have to start over each time... 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

On the former, his name has the stigma attached to it, and he is far too egotistical to have a business not have his name on it.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately. Hiring lobbyists can literally fox his issue. Which in itself is bullshit

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Rightly so, a good example is he still has a presidential channel and refuses to use it because his personal twitter account is banned

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 912 Dislikes 1

v

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I am amazed that interview hasn't been revisited, it's awful how awful the 'Rona is going.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

What was the contract for anyway?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Concessions around the city.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Protection

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

An ice rink, carousel and lazer tag arena

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

News just in. ... Vote is at 225 including 10 republicans

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Heard it here first. I'm an Aussie doing Aussie things in Australia.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not american here, how many do they need?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

217 ?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

nice

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuckin ridiculous that there was only 10 republicans too, should have been unanimous.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

here's the thing. The ones who are retiring, or not running again, swap votes, with people who want to vote to impeach, but can now safely 2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

vote to keep trump in and not upset their idiot constituents. I suspect 10 is the max number of people retiring, or not running again. 3

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

otherwise, it would be a solid 1/2 of the republicans available.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Literally 0 excuse to not vote to put on a trial an insurrectionist, you are part of the insurrection if you do not imo

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They’re scared of their own supporters.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Then they need to grow some balls

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

exactly

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m sure there is a “no treason” clause

5 years ago | Likes 1601 Dislikes 3

there still time :)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well reps wanted at will employment, so they should understand that you don't need a reason to get rid of someone.

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Going to add one to all my contracts

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It’s those work fire clauses where you can be fired for any treason.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The important word here is contract. Let’s see how it plays out.

5 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Close. There a "no criminal conduct" clause.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Even better, that makes it nice, clear, and easy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then the contracts probably shd have been cancelled years ago ?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He would have to be tried and convicted.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope. Being charged is enough. See how fast actors and athletes lose sponsors when they get caught. Long before they see a courtroom.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What does an "annual city" contract actually entail and wtf does it entail that's worth 17mil?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

"De Blasio said the Trump Organization earns about $17 million a year in profits from its contracts to run two ice skating rinks 1/

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

and a carousel in Central Park as well as a golf course in the Bronx." according to ABC News

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Cheers for that, thank ye. :)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the central park one is covered in the netflix document appropriately kept in the mafia section...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Kind of like how all Apple ToSs have a "not for use in constructing weapons of mass destruction" clause

5 years ago | Likes 197 Dislikes 0

Make sure to read the “human centipede clause”

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also it's not to be used on nuclear submarines.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Linux it is

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IIRC this is stated to satisfy international shipping rules.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Define "mass"...

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Enslaved energy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The main Eucharistic liturgical service in many forms of Western Christianity.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

...but that's not important right now

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Go with the Physics angle: If you are destroying something that has mass, it's a weapon of mass destruction.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Can you destroy mass itself?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No; at most, you turn it into energy. But I cleverly avoided that by specifying "something that has mass", not mass itself.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hmmm conservation of mass and energy..... I guess everything up to a nuke is fair game since only that destroys some mass

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's why I carefully worded it with "destroying something that has mass". The object is still destroyed. Its mass... redistributed.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

God damnit. I knew I should have read the bloody ToS.

5 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 0

I know right! What the hell am I going to do with all this uranium now?

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Feed it to spiders

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Put your dick in it

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Well maybe I could finally become my stripper name, "Radioactive Manhole".

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Might work

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Use Microsoft?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*SWAT breaks through my windows*

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tell bob the shotgunner he owes me tree fiddy!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“...starting now.”

5 years ago | Likes 712 Dislikes 3

Say what you will about them, but until down he wasn't cheering an insurrection

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

He was calling for one tho.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is what my inner monologue appends to the end of every groups' statement about cutting ties with Trump.

5 years ago | Likes 121 Dislikes 1

In NYs defense they have been trying to get out of contracts with him for almost 5 years now

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

We don't do business with insurrectionists, but we're fine with white nationalist rapists.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

“Publicly”

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well, yes, this kicked it up about 9000 notches bud

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup. There's a wave of people bailing on him, so companies join the wave because they see it's the most advantageous move. They still >

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

> dealt with him and often supported him during all the bullshit that lead to this.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Agreed. They get a tiny amount of stock back since they at least have a line...but this is way too late.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree fundamentally, but better late than never. At least once he's out of office, his brand is now toxic.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sadly a lot of damage has been done to society. The racist, hateful people are now united and feel more justified.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know, but at least they did *something*, at *some point.* Better that then silent complicity through the Biden administration.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Trump has always been shitty, but he hasn't really been an insurrectionist until pretty recently.

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 3

From your article: "Of course, I would accept a clear election result, but I would also reserve my right to contest or file a legal 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

challenge in the case of a questionable result". He was still saying he'd play by the rules at that time. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Perfect gaslighting- I always play fear, I mean fair....

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and he still says he's playing by the rules right now. Do you think he is?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2