No more building.

Jun 2, 2023 2:57 AM

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/01/us/arizona-phoenix-groundwater-limits-development-climate

20 years too late

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its almost like unregulated abuse of the environment is a bad idea.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's as if nature is trying to tell bone heads who live in a freakin' desert something.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The falling axe does not care if you believe in it or not.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My wife's best friend and her boyfriend are moving to Arizona later this year. I cannot fathom anyone wanting to move *to* the Southwest after all the news about water shortages this year.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Maybe start with no more pools

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Maybe growing the most water intensive crops and the fucking desert wasn't such a great idea.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

A truly hard nosed economic answer is... charge for water. Only the things that use it efficiently will be competitive. Use market forces to enforce efficient use. Its the kind of idea that should appeal to right wingers, if the right wing still actually had anything to do with realistic economics.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why won't you think of the profits damn you! Let the taxpayers pay for our exploitation of them!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Phoenix is a testament to man's ego." -Peggy Hill

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

it's almost like building in the middle of a desert wasn't the best idea...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

By "groundwater", do they mean the aquifers they sold to the Saudis so they could grow alfalfa livestock feed?

3 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 2

This!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Correct!

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

They finally revoked their permits after public outcry.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Source? Genuinely curious as someone who used to live there and hated this practice had been going on.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://apnews.com/article/arizona-water-permit-revoked-saudi-arabia-9abbb2b85bd4295ebc7c6403d85bf70d Well it turns out they just rescinded a couple of drilling permits. Existing pumps are still running. It's my fault for just reading the headline and assuming the government had stood up to corporate influence to do what's right for actual people. Very stupid of me.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No worries but I appreciate the source! Little steps in the right direction are better than nothing

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And by "Colorado River" do they mean the river where they deliberately over-allocate water takes?

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

They actually allow California farmers to some of their share.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

120%!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Water takes?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Comments on that article are wild

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That city should have never been founded!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Besides conserving water and projects recycling water, Arizona elected officials – including Sen. Mark Kelly, a Democrat – have advocated for creating new water supply through desalination, where ocean water is treated to remove the salt." I agree, let's set up desalination plants all along the Arizona coast line.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Sure is too bad that there isn't this thing called an infrastructure that can allow goods to be moved from one area to another. We all know moving things from Texas or California to Arizona is impossible, which is too bad, since it forces them to rely only upon things which can be found within the state and not anything from anywhere else on Earth.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Well, yes, but actually no. Shipping water ends up unreasonably expensive unless it's solely drinking water or you've reduced usage to the point that it doesn't matter anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Desalination is expensive. If you charge realistic user fees for it, it will make Agriculture with it too costly to be competitive. I fear a system where agriculture gets the free water from the Colorado, while urban and suburban citizens are charged for the expensive stuff.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s a monument to man’s arrogance

3 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

"‘My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!’
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This is the best reply to what was a perfect comment

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The time of fucking about has ended. The time of finding out has begun.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cant they just continue to ignore Global Warming like the GOP says?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They should require 100% onsite water reuse

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What? No more swimming pools or golf courses?!!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Its amazing what you can flush down the toilet.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Chew your food next time

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dam(n) Cow.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That bovine looks so content

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

yo same

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe they should stop letting the fucking Saudis grow water intensive crops to be shipped back using our fucking water!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can only lie for so long. We sold the same ground water 500 times. Growth was driving force to Phoenix. The limiting factor is water. There is a hundred times less than when it started. That pulling water from the air better work or millions of people are going to have suck air and die.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Desert air is too dry to get any meaningful amount of water out of it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can, it's just expensive as all hell :) Typical energy use for atmospheric water is 500 to 850 watt-hours of electricity per 1 liter produced. Arizona will be at the high end of that range.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, source for the above is a good video on atmospheric water production, https://youtu.be/zhgRWFBdqj8

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

welp. arizona is over

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What was hilarious was seeing a tweet about this and replies from $8cels saying "this isn't real it's leftist propaganda!" sure dumbass

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And by this they meant climate change, of course

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

is this the same place that sold farmland to saudis for like, 5$/acre and are allowing those farms unlimited water usage?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh no.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also water knife by paolo bacigalupi

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

On it! Thx for the rec.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Welp here we go. And so the resource wars begin

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they covered all those irrigation canals with solar.... But noooo, that would be "too green" or something.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Sure it would solve it...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not on it's own but it sure AF would help with evaporation loss. It's been done in other places to great success.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Might have been a good strategy about 30 years ago. Too little, too late

3 years ago | Likes 657 Dislikes 4

It’s almost like building a major metropolitan city in the middle of a desert was a bad idea.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

get rid oh those lawns and pools, people. Yes. YOU *stares angrily at the rich*

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

The next step is going to be more sea water desalination plants along the California coast(There are already 13), and in the sea of Cortez in Mexico. Those plans are already being discussed. Will we abandon the Southwest, one of the most economically productive regions in the country? No way!

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

ELI5 what can you produce here that can't be produced somewhere else? Is it cheaper because the infrastructure is already in place and isn't factored in to the cost? Factoring in things like the water crisis, is the day-to-day operations still cheaper than transplanting these businesses elsewhere? If you have the time to explain I'm curious

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

California ranks first in the United States for agricultural cash receipts followed by Iowa, Texas, Nebraska and Illinois. California accounts for 46% of the U.S. fruit and nut production and 62% of the national value of fruit and nut crops. You can't just upend all of that infrastructure and farming and move it elsewhere, not overnight. That would take a lot of effort. We can't even get national free healthcare. No way congress would act. The states have to act on their own and find solutions.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mostly it is about temperature and sun. They can grow incredible crops of almonds, avocados and other high value crops that wouldn't survive somewhere with real winters. Unfortunately because it's arid they have to use a lot of water on these plants.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Oct 26, 2023 1:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The well isn't dry yet, these measures are being put in place now to prevent that. The hysteria surrounding Arizona's water, is overblown. Prudent planning is needed, and that's what they are doing, while we have a competent governor.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Stop growing water intensive crops in deserts.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not the one doing that. But since you brought it up, think about what that would mean. More food would have to be shipped to the Southwest to feed people. California accounts for 46% of the U.S. fruit and nut production and 62% of the national value of fruit and nut crops. California ranks first in the United States for agricultural cash receipts followed by Iowa, Texas, Nebraska and Illinois. If you want to pay double for your fruit and nuts, and food in general, yes we can stop growing it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Slowing expansion is for the nice laces that people want to be!! /s

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Saudi Arabian alfalfa leases dried it up

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

I am curious, normally you completely dry alfalfa before bailing it for shipping. if the alfalfa is dried in this manor doesn't the water stay in it's original ecosystem?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Precipitation

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A quick google search comes up with around 200 golf courses in the Phoenix area. Also about 33% of the houses have swimming pools.

3 years ago | Likes 313 Dislikes 2

I was gonna say, when I lived there about 10-12 years ago I remember there being ALOT of golf courses in Phoenix, I think also in Scottsdale. I worked as a house cleaner in those areas and another town adjacent to them called Canyon Creek I think? It was Canyon something. I remember they were all very high end ritzy places. Many like mansions practically and they all had really nice pools. I can only imagine how much water and money goes into keeping a hot AF desert green.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

i live in scottsdale. there are three within a mile of me and eight more within five miles. i have never been to any. i hate how dumb and obnoxious they are. and you are thinking of cave creek

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, Cave Creek, thank you.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think this is one instance where swimming pools can be forgiven. But not the golf courses.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

A quick Google search also shows that Southern California uses several times as much water, mostly from the Colorado River, as ALL 10,000+ golf courses in the entire United States combined, just growing almonds and pistachios. They have 2.1 million acres of commercial almond and pistachio farms.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Most of California shouldn't be farm land.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eliminating both of those drains wouldn’t save as much water as you’d expect. AZ’s problems can be better connected to the almost unrestricted ability for land owners to drill wells and pump unlimited water. New AG is trying to crack down on this. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/in-drought-stricken-arizona-fresh-scrutiny-of-saudi-arabia-owned-farms-water-use

3 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 4

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Pools have literally nothing to do with it. You dont refill the pool once a week. You fill it once EVER then give it *some* water monthly

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

You don't know people.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I'll take "I don't understand evaporation for 400" Alex

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I don't live in the desert, the pool was covered when not in use, and still needed topping up weekly.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about not everyone in the goddamn city take a 20min shower every day? How about outlawing grass lawns? Pools.... gimme a break

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Grass lawns are a travesty in general, especially in warm climates. But showers really aren't a huge problem.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Why would showers be a problem? The water is going into the drain, and the drain should be going to somewhere that water can be treated and re-used.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

75% of our water usage is agricultural for farmland. the most popular methods 90%+ is sprinkler or crop row/flooding which is the most wasteful or least efficient. furthermore we have a use it or loose it policy to encourage waste

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I was just reading something about a startup trying to fix that by running pipe type things down each row to water plants individually kinda, to minimize water usage. Hopefully its not too expensive

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let’s talk about the land that Az leases to Saudi’s Arabia, they grow alfalfa on it and then send the alfalfa back to Saudi. How much water is being used for that? https://www.kdminer.com/news/arizona-ag-says-she-ll-end-saudi-farming-agreements-along-the-colorado-river/article_8298244a-af39-5e2d-a57c-d2ce9df3ed9e.html

3 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 0

ironically because Saudi Arabia is even worse when it comes to water sustainability. That country won't survive post oil economy if they stop being able to afford desalination. it could well be the worst non war/disease related catastrophe in history.

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

No countries will survive the end of the carbon blip. International shipping goes away and all human economies shrink back down to the size of something powered by muscle.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

If we can ride carbon long enough to get renewables going in earnest we'll pull through, but yea economies and populations will need to shrink and more economic activity will be localized. I'm pretty OK with that.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

eh. There are alternatives, but current technology is not close enough to deal post oil world. but I'm not so pessimistic as to think that material technology won't progress. There's plenty of oil reserves left. But the easily exploited, and highly profitable ones, like Saudi Arabia, will run dry far before we get to any kind of global depletion.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Humans sailed the oceans to deliver black peppercorns... We can do the same with walmart shipping containers full of plastic crap.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We already have nuclear powered ships?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hardly, there's plenty of carbon energy for about 200 years and it will not stay in the ground until renewable energy costs less, including CapEx WACC and OpEx, than the elastic limit of fossil, about $0.00_25/kWh today but eventually far higher as it runs out. At present rates this might cross in 50-100 years, which means environmental changes will meaningfully reduce the human burden on resources, including fossil. The equatorial poor will bear the brunt of this. Nature doesn't care, at all.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Solar and wind is already cheaper than coal and NG for electricity. This year was the first year that investment in that sector outpaced fossil.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Environmental changes will meaningfully reduce the human burden on resources' - surely the most dispassionate way I've ever seen of describing the oncoming horror.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So, back to the days of beautifully rigged sailing ships? This time, no scurvey.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

swimming pools arn't a good argument for water use. The water they take up it overall drops compared to others in the area. Its also mostly static, once full they need very little to retain that level. Golf courses, large industry, and farming are around 70-80% of the water use in that area. I bet swimming pools are less than .25%

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Every pool I've ever seen leaks like a sonofabitch. ESPECIALLY the in-ground ones.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Can we agree golf is terrible for the planet? There is one in a pristine marsh near me and I hate all the chemicals they pump into the waterways.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's the farming and golf courses and people INSISTING on having lawns, honestly. I live here. I own a pool, it came with the house...You're not wrong. They barely need any maintaining for water levels once they're filled, even here and in full sun.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it is farming. thats all. everything else is noise. For people trying to foment a class war in order to topple the US and expand spheres of control to capture a greater share of global raw materials, fabricating illnumerate outrage at stereotypical scapegoats and exploiting social divisions is, by far, the most cost effective munition in the arsenal; at least one, probably two orders of magnitude better MoE than even biological weapons.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Agriculture has gone from accounting for 90% of water use down to 74% so I wouldn’t say that agriculture is the only use but it absolutely is the largest. https://sustainability-innovation.asu.edu/food/news/archive/where-the-water-goes-water-in-arizonan-agriculture/

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

fair, and good stat. respect

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0