Screw the English government

Jan 31, 2019 9:14 PM

ImTheKimJongIllest

Views

134163

Likes

5224

Dislikes

321

And the crown, and all the bloody people who support this thought policing and waste of taxpayer pounds

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We don't use dollars here in England.

7 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 8

Well you should. Fuckin' un-American bastards.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 14

I really fucking hate people who erupt into bullshit social media outrage over stuff like this. Read the story and think or STFU

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 14

I hate when people say THIS takes away freedom of speech. Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t know you wanted the freedom to ruin other people’s lives

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

And say you want to harm a group of people who are just living their lives

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

What happened here? What are any of these cases? Give me the info on them, not tweets you walnut

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

People assume the entire PD is sitting behind a single phone sending tweets. Anyone seen Brooklyn 99? We all know there's a Gina in every PD

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Front page doesn't need this. We need jokes!

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

Theyre thoughts when theyre in you head. When they come out theyre something else.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sweetie, that's because they can maybe deter the harassment with 5 minutes of a statement on Twitter ... they're not ACTUALLY devoting much.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They were trying to catch that swan I bet v

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Wow cue the false outrage machine. God forbid they go after hate crimes and hate speech.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Lots of us are Americans. Hate Speech is a fundamental Human right here. So we see that issue differently

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I’m an American. I love how civil libertarians will be silent during most injustice but vocal when some bigot wants to shoot their mouth off

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Circlejerk approved bullshit propaganda.

7 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 24

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sure, that seems rational, reasonable, not one-sided at all.

7 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 35

Yup, I bet the police department threw millions of pounds of resources at a transphobic tweet while watching a white man die slowly. Awful.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

They spent time and effort contacting the businesses of people who liked and reposted the tweet. That seems a bit much

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

British police can go fuck themselves. Too busy caring about typed out words rather than investigating on the spot crimes. Cunts.

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 25

I’ve only had positive responses with the police, what are your experiences with how they’ve dealt with you?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imgur is filled with conservatives who think they're liberal lol

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Death in a flat is not as visible as trolls on the forrums

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Also in UK: Boris Johnson, former London Mayor, won a poetry cometition for writing the most offensive lymeric about Pres. Erdogan of Turkey

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can confirm that Humberside Police are pretty fucking useless. Even before the police cuts.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For fuck's sake, they made a phone call to the guy, who was an ex-cop, over his transphobic posts, because hate speech is illegal in the UK.

7 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 14

WHY THE fuck is "hate speech" even a thing? Grow a god damn spine! Who cares what someone else thinks of you.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Because words can be weaponized, used to incite violence and hatred.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Is resilience so hard to build these days?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, we should all be allowed to threaten people and advise people to commit terrorism since we have the right to free speech! That means

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

nothing we could say should ever be illegal.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But, no, let's pretend like they raided his home with militarized police because he "Liked a limerick." Can't fuck with the narrative.

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 14

Ah yes another one of those "the UK is a dystopian, PC-ravaged wasteland gone mad" posts. Didn't know it was that time of the year already.

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 13

I hate when people say that. The police are great and try with what they’re given. They cant help the budget cuts. They really helped me out

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When a guy threatened me with a knife. Often people don’t go down the right avenues or can’t describe important parts of a situation quick

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Enough for them to form an accurate depiction of what’s going on with time to react. Apparently some people describe their afternoon tea

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Before saying “oh yeah and there’s blood around me I’ve been stabbed”

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's usersub's secret, Captain. It's ALWAYS that time.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

@OP oh truly UK is an Orwellian nightmare. An officer was given a stern talking to for mocking and belittling trans people. OH THE HORROR!

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Getting charged for hate crimes for posting song lyrics or teaching a dog a dumb salute sounds Orwellian enough to me.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

How come every time people like you try and paint the UK as an Orwellian nightmare you use the same two examples?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It’s not Orwellian. You can say whatever you want as long as you’re not citing violence (eg saying you want to kill etc) or ...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Targeting people in particular. Targeted bullying can be a real issue and once it gets past a certain point should absolutely be illegal

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I feel like the venn diagram of people taking a handful of isolated incidents and crying about thought police, and people who always say

7 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 31

"Not all men" is a perfect circle

7 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 27

Horseshoe theory is a fun thing, innit. Almost like people can be dumb, no matter who they are. :)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

"Not all men (but definitely me)".

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Always someone crying on a post like this. If it doesn't bother you that people can't speak freely, then you ARE the fucking problem

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 12

Found one

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really though I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of being offended by generalisations against you but then talking about thought police

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it doesnt bother you that people harass and hate others just for the way they are then YOU are the fucking problem.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Some people 100% bring it upon themselves, so don't dare call me the fucking problem

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"He brought it on himself by being who he is"... you sound like a charmer. A total catch!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah so its okay to have free speech to shit on other people, but don't dare use any of that free speech on you?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People can speak freely about their views. Attacking a specific person and calling them slurs shouldn’t be accepted.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Also saying you want to kill/rape/torture a certain group of people shouldn’t come under protected speech either. How is that just a view?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Making it illegal is something else, entirely. If internet trolls want to be internet trolls, they should have every legal right.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

No. They should not have every right to make someone’s life a living hell and drive them to suicide.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Why always talk about extremes? In the case that a person is that emotionally unstable, they shouldn't be engaging internet trolls

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Its worth mentioning that the definition of 'hate speech' in England includes threats and intent to cause violence. Its also a 10 second

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 15

'investigation' vs one of possible hundreds of calls investing vague claims of someone's 'wellbeing' with no actual sign of danger, each

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 13

aking hours. The 'hate speech' in this case is could be far more likely to be connected to, or leading up to, actual intent of violence.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

Basically this complaint might boil down to "why did you spend 5 minutes investigating the continuous death threats on your profile but

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

not a couple days investigating me feeling nervous," and while the outcome was sad, the police wouldn't know that until after. But heh,

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

it involves trans people, so fuck them right?

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

The current laws are bullshit, though. There was some girl arrested for rap lyrics, some idiots made a joke about the london riots

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

and were uninvolved in them, and they were arrested. There are lots of other exaamples

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Do you have the 'rap lyrics' story?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

4 and that's why she got arrested, which to me basically makes this all a huge pile of bullshit

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 Also, I read somewhere that what happened wasn't that it was reported, but that a police officer saw and decided it was offensive

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 it was fucking stupid to post, but I would say that I feel like there wasn't racist intent here, and she shouldn't have been arrested

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-43816921 I don't have the post itself, but it was a snoop dogg song, it had the nword

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

huh ok weird

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This makes a lot more sense when you realize 'hate speech' includes threats and intents to incite violence, and while sad, to the police

7 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 23

Lisa's call was probably one of a hundred calls of people feeling nervous about someone they know. Hindsight is 20/20. But hey, fuck trans

7 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 20

people right?

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 19

Why do you think this keeps going around here?

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Because of the last line, "fuck trans people, right?"

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Yep

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

1. Noone is saying fuck trans people (double entendre). But seriously, stop being dramatic. People talk shit without threatening and it can

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

3. Christians for example (and endlessly so) and what government official gives a rip? Can't develop new morality, you will lose in the end

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

If I go into work and start harassing or threatening someone and say its because he's christian and I think Christianity should be

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

banned, I'd get in trouble at work and no one would argue in my favor. If I did the same but said it was because the person was trans

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2. Still be viewed as hate speech. Freedom of speech is being constricted when you talk about certain groups, but people talk shit about

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I will never support a system that criminally condemns disagreeing with transgenderism.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 16

"Condemns disagreeing" vs "investigates threats and potential violence"

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So you agree there should never be a punishment for misgendering someone purposely, for saying transgenderism is a mental disorder?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

No one criminally condemns anything like that. If you're inciting violence on the other hand, then yes.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I think the thing that piques my interest here is that I've never seen the 'limerick' in question.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The limerick was just one of over 30 tweets the guy made or retweeted that resulted in the police phoning him. Just an FYI. Kinda tiring 1/

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

that every time I see one of these outrage porn comments, it's frequently been twisted & distorted like this. But as for the limerick... 2/

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Like, this shit could be a cute little rhyme about bashing trans folks' heads in for all I know. It could also NOt be that, but people

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

have made a point of not actually posting it, so it feels like people pretending it's less nasty than it actually is.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

My friend had his storage container broken into and caught them in the act. The thieves got stuck in the mud, called their friends to tow

7 years ago | Likes 298 Dislikes 6

“They have guns” 2 mins later .....

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Them out. They came got the thieves unstuck and helped steal all my mates tools. 3 hours later the police arrived... shit!

7 years ago | Likes 238 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2019 3:02 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yep I get that but isn't that what the police are for? And if it isn't then why should we pay the taxes they set put to police us

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the problem. Unless a crime is in progress they can’t do anything. When a crime IS in progress, they don’t show up. Here’s an e.g.

7 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

One summer we had a rare VW van set fire outside our place. The police were called and showed up...THE NEXT DAY. I mean wtf?!!

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

The thing is my mate called the police as it was happening! And so the pikeys mates response time was faster than the police

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That’s quite impressive to be fair...I guess if you need a job done, call a pikey

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Saying to the police "I have a gun and am going to kill these thieves" will get them out in a jiffy

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Haha or saying semd an ambulance I've shot one already

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I lived in London I heard a scuffle outside the flat, saw and filmed one dude stomping on another. Called the rozzers and FOUR...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

...separate detectives turned up (the next day) and took the same statement and then basically fought over who got to take the video.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seemed like they were more interested in a 'slam dunk' case than anything, to pad their stats I suppose.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The best bit was they didn't actually have a process for me to send them the video. No email, no upload online. I had to WhatsApp it to...

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That’s why you (if possible) carry a concealed weapon

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... did they not have plates on their cars?

7 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 2

This is why you people fucking need guns!

7 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 39

My friend has shotguns in his house but fuck killing people for theft

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"thieves are here" "okay we'll send someone when we can" "I shot them" *squad car pulls up immediately*

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

v

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Honestly, I'm pretty anti gun myself, but it would be so much easier in this situation

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

To shoot thieves that are stuck in mud?

7 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 4

Or the ones that showed up to help them.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

To hold them until the police arrive.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yeah. They are on your property with criminal intent, you can shoot them

7 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 16

Can=/=should. I’m sure you’ll get that someday.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

And what would that accomplish? Dead people? Nah, people don’t deserve to die just for thieving

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 20

The thieves would be a lot less likely to try their break in in the first place

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Plus if they're stuck in the mud it makes it easier to aim---no moving targets..

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not to mention dead people have an essentially zero recidivism rate. Cept of course necromancers n such

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

7 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 77

It's not that PC culture has gone too far (it is partly that) that ultimate matters, it's that policing the internet

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

has so far failed to truly demonstrate that context and intention are being taken into account.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

A girl was posted for posting snoop dogg lyrics. It had the nword in it, probably best not to post it, but still it's hard to say that

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

it can be considered to be offensive in context because it's a quotation of a song written by a black guy.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And it's not like she had any discernible intention

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s gone too far when the policing of jokes or crudeness, even prejudicial crudeness, comes before protecting life.

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 21

Nice strawman i suppose. Very reductionist

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 22

Yes. It always seemed to be it is less 'people are more sensitive about abuse/harrassment" and more "there used to be some groups that

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

were seen as acceptable targets for abuse/harrassment and aren't anymore." If I threaten to injure someone, I could always get in trouble,

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

but if that person is trans, then people will complain it was my freedom of speech.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

A girl in England was fined & given a community order for reposting rap lyrics on her Instagram, cuz it was deemed racist and offensive.

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 10

From what I read somewhere, it wasn't reported, it was just seen by a police officer who read it and decided it was offensive

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

the failure to consider context is the major issue here. I'm not sure to what extent offensive comments should be criminalised, but I am

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

very sure that you have to consider context and intention as major players.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I mean, as an American, speech should only ever be criminalized if it's an actual incitement to violence, like shouting "Fire" in a theatre

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But this is men with guns going to your house and saying don't post that or we will fine or jail you. Are you for that?

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 24

No guns in Britain mate.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Police in the UK do not regularly carry firearms. Try again.

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 10

"Sir! Cease this action at once or I shall bish-bash your bollocks with my bumbershoot!" -Brittish cops

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

You certainly have the wrong picture of British law enforcement.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

That's not what happened, is it?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 14

Community service and a fine. Not exactly kicking down doors with guns, most UK police officers aren't even armed...

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

To historical events. So while this event is maybe not guns, the association to violent altercation is one that still is held close for 3/

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I support free speech, but am incredibly suspicious of the underlying motives of these kinds of posts on imgur.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Merseyside

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't blame the police, blame the bastards who are stretching them ridiculously thin and are setting the targets. Talk about a thankless job

7 years ago | Likes 2126 Dislikes 152

do you want us to feel sorry about police’s life? L M F A O good one kid

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Just about every job is a thankless job, you think truck drivers who transport food, medical supplies, building supplies, fuel, and many

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Other things get thanked? Do people thank the janitors that clean their office, I personally have never been thanked at any of my jobs, and

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I've held many different jobs. A wellness check takes 5 min, maybe 10, I see alot of cops sitting on the side of the road picking their ass

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm sure they could find a way to spare a cop for a wellness check.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'll blame both.

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

Damn right, over 60% of police stations have been closed, there’s practically no beat bobbies except in major cities etc. etc.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maybe dont waste you energy pursuing hate speech crimes then. No one is forcing them to charge people for that

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

How do we divide our police forces attentions most efficiently? Make them pointlessly persue cases where it's constantly...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Ambiguous who's in the wrong and there's no real damage done to anyone.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

we...we could also blame the people that commit the crime, right?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Any job dealing with the general public is thankless except once in a great while. The world is a scary place full of ignorance.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

"My neighbor is black." "Kids are laughing." "People drive 5 kmph over the speed limit." Or how bout" my husband beat me, AGAIN." Waste .

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 7

Blame the police! And anyone else driven by the "politically correct!"

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I don't I don't downvote comments putting cops in a positive light pretty much ever, these cops are putting the focus in the wrong area

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Like the people who call the police because someone hurt their feelings?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah. Honestly that’s what the bastards want, too. Blame the police so they can keep doing it and fix nothing.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fixing nothing is free after all.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What? It’s clearly the police’s own fault. They state clearly in the tweet what their priority is.

7 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 19

Inappropriate jokes are the worst form of violence.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Higher up the chain they say we investigate this: x. The. Say they need y money to do it. Then remove money into X which is cheap.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People then lose their job or get downgraded to make room for X, while other problems can no longer afford to be fixed or told not to be.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile the actual policemen that would have investigated things that aren’t X don’t have a job.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They do what they can with the money they're given. A street Bobby is more expensive than a pen pusher.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't fault the police, cause the people that run 'em got 'em on a short leash.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wellness check takes 5 mins. Its 5 fucking mins dont tell me they are to busy. Its someone fucking life.

7 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 26

but... muh facebuk feelsings

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

1)Reminds me of a story, not sure if true, that a family was concerned about a relative in Florida during a hurricane and called their

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If there's a problem it'll take a while to resolve... but they want to be able to ignore the problem then they won't have to do anything.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

UK police wife here - I wish you knew the other ridiculous shit that police are tied up with. Sometimes there genuinely is nobody left.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why couldn't she have gone round and checked herself? It only takes five minutes as you say... An underbugeted humberside police force 1/

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Has to oversee a massive area containing over a million people. They can't be everywhere and do everything because some cunt would 1/

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Moan about them not being on the street and policing violent crime or something

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

2) police to check on him as they haven't heard from him in a while. Cops said no but Domino's said yes.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

My immediate thought "Control, we'll take Peach Trees"

7 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 4

Thot control. My mind went horribly elsewhere

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What is this from?

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

The movie Dredd, where the police can only respond to like 3% of all calls. I a way it looks like we are going there.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

"DREDD" the one with Keith Urban.

7 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

That would be an interesting watch

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lmao I'm an idiot. I mean Karl Urban.

7 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Eh all good you got the movie. Unless Keith has done a metal album called Dredd lol.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Thanks

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're welcome.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Peoples problem with police starts with expecting an officer to be better than the average Joe. They're just doing it for a paycheck too.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 22

Which also means man of them are focused on a minimal work to pay ratio. Not even the majority are idealistic.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Most cops work way longer than average.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They shouldn’t be.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Hmmm. What if we pay them less, like teachers, so then only the dedicated will ever do it?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They already get paid shit compared to the work they do. Maybe that’s the issue.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really, cops get paid pretty damn well, one of my buddies right out of the academy was making 60k a year.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Problem is, they should be better than the average Joe and hold themselves up to that higher standard, but most don't.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Most? Can I look up that statistic somewhere? Or is that just your biased opinion?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yeah, helping someone in need counts zero to "crimes detected" targets. Gotta keep finding crimes, lets literally police limericks.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Fuck the police. It’s a thankless job because they are not worthy of thanks. They think they are above citizens and above the law.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 63

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And God help you if you hurt someone breaking into your house...

7 years ago | Likes 591 Dislikes 40

Physically or emotionally?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Shoots in Texan*

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

In Britain or the US? I’m a peaceful man but castle doctrine says I’m Fucking them up something wicked.

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Thank god MO follows that doctrine.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I wish OH followed it. Duty to retreat can kiss my ass.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Duty to retreat? That’s real? This is just in defiance of natural Fucking law. You can’t make me make myself a victim. I refuse.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even liberal California follows it. DA told a neighbor, “if you shoot a man in the back at the edge of your driveway I’ll prosecute” but 1/

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Had no problem with other self defense scenarios.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I always questioned the reasoning behind it. I mean, if someone breaks into my house and I take care of the problem, how would anyone know

7 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 1

Prove to me that the BBC can't listen to everything that goes on in your house, whenever they want. Then you can ask, how would anyone know"

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 19

Out of all of the 3 letter agencies in the world.... You went with the BBC? What?

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

1: because the BBC already claims they have vans that can spy on you. 2: if the BBC can, then even North Korea can.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

Sir, please remove the aluminum foil from your person. You can not enter a metal detector with an aluminum foil hat

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

he was even there? He'd just be missing. Forever.

7 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 0

Right you got a backyard for a reason. Natural fertilizer, plant a garden right on top of there. You got yourself some mighty fine veggies.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Nah. Put them under where you're building a fence. Dead body releases gas. Concrete fenceposts help. Whoa gonna dig up a bunch of fence post

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Oh then dying isn’t the problem. It’s if they get hurt. In many states they can sue you for damages and win.

7 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Moral of the story is: if you shoot an intruder, make sure you kill him I guess.

7 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

If you have to injure a intruder make sure its a killing blow.

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

I am glad I live in Colorado with the "Make My Day" law.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Not true 2 years ago a guy broke into my house and i broke his jaw and ribs. Police said it was reasonable force

7 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 3

The problem here is it all hinges on a police officer's whim. If he's having a bad day or doesn't like your face... hard luck old chum.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That’s the problem, the rules for reasonable force are too vague and leave too much space for personal opinions. One person might think 1

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It’s reasonable but someone else may thinks it’s excessive and you get screwed for pushing someone over

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

there's such thing as reasonable force. For ex. - I cant just shoot the neighbourhood negro kids for stepping on my lawn except in 14 states

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

In the UK?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow good on you for using reasonable force to protect your home! And surprised this is a thing in UK, thanks for sharing!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.gov.uk/reasonable-force-against-intruders in my case I happen to teach and compete at boxing so just beat the shit out of him

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's becuase people don't understand self defense is HIGHLY state specific. Shoot someone in your house in Texas, you are fine. Do it 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

in New York or Maryland, and you will have a lot of legal problems. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but in many cases he can sue you and win.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not in the UK he couldnt.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember, in america, they actually tell you to avoid having the intruder survive.

7 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 11

Depends on the state.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is because using a gun is a nuclear option. We’re trigger happy enough. We can’t make them appropriate for “maybe” type situations.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but you guys are actually allowed to kill the intruders instead of wasting taxpayer money locking them up in a criminal training school

7 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 10

that's not really true. You have to prove they intended to harm you. You cant just shoot them in the back

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on the state and if they have a stand your ground law. Some states you can be convicted for harming an intruder

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

You won't be convicted for killing them though. If you say "He said he had a gun and was gonna hurt me", you're home free.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I am from germany, killing is never allowed here...

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Could you clarify the "never"? Im legitimately curious. Are you not allowed to kill in self defense, or defense of your home?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did someone tell the criminals so they know not to kill you when breaking into your home?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My bad i assumed you where american.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

That's only if you shoot them. If you shoot them, its advised that you shoot to kill.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

You absolutely CANNOT shoot to wound or warn. The law will Fuck you up for that.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No it won't. Its just that a gun is always lethal force, since even an arm or leg hit can make you bleed out and die or 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In my concealed carry class, we were told, "one in the head, one in the gut"

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Double-tap

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's horrible advice from an instructor. (Certified instructor here) You shoot to stop the threat. Not that garbage.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Except you never say that in court. You shoot to stop the threat- if that means killing them...well, that's that.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Exactly. That's the only reason to shoot in the first place.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"I discharged my firearm until the threat was no longer advancing and disarmed." Proceed to do CPR while on phone with 911.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0