stardustLUST
9320
409
33
ART: https://www.artstation.com/clausyu
LYRICS: The Beatles - Golden Slumbers (1969)
Jul 12, 2026 7:09 PM
stardustLUST
9320
409
33
ART: https://www.artstation.com/clausyu
LYRICS: The Beatles - Golden Slumbers (1969)
dcondogg
A wonderful work. Brings memories. Good eye! Thanks for the link.
shyriath
a lullabaaaaiiiieeeeeee
CandiedCorn
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&channel=entpr&q=female+anatomy+references
PubMed12927120suckssobad
Well, THAT'S browseable
PaulNewmansGhost
Maturing is realizing that Zora will rock your world!
Sebastopol140
This song by the Beatles is too damn short.
OmnibusLatinName
Part of makes it perfect :)
DaveSamsonite
Great harmony tho
ScottPaul57
But you're gonna have to carry that weight a long time....
GravyEducation
See you, Space Cowboy
bacononbacon
FitzTheWittedBastard
Wtf is up with this ongoing shitty body image where the woman has an eight inch waist? Where are her internal organs, in her ribcage? Has she worn a corset for the past 10 years?
I also enjoy looking at a beautiful woman, but how about taking an anatomy lesson next time asshole
DaveSamsonite
The approximate WHR (waist hip ratio) is 0.55 as measured with a pixel map approach. It's uncommon but not impossible. Remember this is about the ratio. Many women have large hips.
A 36" waist and 45" hip measurement (circumference) is what this drawing equates to.
madflenser
It's fairly obviously meant to be stylized. Might not be the style you like, but it clearly is not supposed to be a hyper realistic drawing. There may be other such cases in art media.
PubMed12927120suckssobad
Maybe its supposed to be a caricature?
MankHoody
Why does the 2003 review by Edinger et al., PubMed ID 12927120, suck so bad?
jekath
Come on - that's uncalled for. You think anyone wants to listen after a rant like that? Even those who agree would most likely choose to disagree out of resentment of how unnecessary it is to be that rude. Bad form.
AxisOfIndifference
FitzTheWittedBastard
It is not in fact rude to point out that this is outdated art. Worse than a Barbie doll. It does not represent the proportions of a real woman at all, and it is simply a stylistic fail. It looks like what AI would spit out if you asked it for a cartoon half naked woman.
That is my opinion, and I do not force others to share that opinion, just really tired of seeing anatomically incorrect, anorexic little girls sexualized
BrockEffingSamson
You didn't say it was outdated, though. And no one here said you were forcing people to share your opinion. What they said was that you were unnecessarily rude in the way you shared your opinion.
FitzTheWittedBastard
Ok, next time I will be more polite and delicate when I point out the flawed proportions and disturbing baby doll representation. You can all continue on with your lives, I’m sorry I interrupted the mood with my rude behavior. I guess I just have a different preference when enjoying art and nudity in general, and get unnecessary riled up when I see anatomical inaccuracies, it’s like nails on a chalkboard to me. Sorry I was rude about it
jekath
This is moving the goalposts. Screaming "are you a f*cking idiot?" is not just asking questions and what you did was not just pointing out that this was outdated art and claiming that it was, is borderline dishonest.