This

Apr 13, 2022 11:05 AM

chilloutFactor

Views

113499

Likes

1689

Dislikes

96

Siri, what's a non-sequitur?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Your Carbon Footprint is a scam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sgRTbTm91Q

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have replaced my use of the term “government” with “corporate representatives” and it works.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Collusion is corruption, and corruption is counter to proper government action. Collusion is due to government inaction.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They’ll all just trash this planet with the hopes of jettisoning off to another one where they can form their own lawless government

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I heard that oil companies in Northern Canada, developed their long term work sites with climate change in mind, over 30 years ago -

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

- it made me realize how these groups don't give a shit if they destroy everything in the name of profit.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

This will not end without blood. You can't have a sustainable world and bring everyone with you.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

what you just wrote makes no sense

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's simple. There cannot be peace on this planet without getting rid of some people.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Humanity is probably going to die out in 400 years because of the pollution

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We should just raise the prices on billionaires. Like oh that boats 250k but for you it’s 2 million!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Kinda like they do to us for years!!!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I've had this saved since before last January, but now I can't ever use it.

4 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 2

I’ve been planning to start a revolution for years, I just have to wait until people won’t think I’m crazy when I tell them. Soon…

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lmk when

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because they tried it first, and we were horrified. That only proves that this idea was shit from the start. Good for jokes, not real life.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Apr 17, 2025 4:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

If you don’t want to do it their way, the word “overthrow” is not appropriate and shouldn’t be used.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Government corruption.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you're not going to grab a (pitch) fork, there's little point whining about eating the rich.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't mind billionaires as a concept, but only if they get there while paying taxes, and following good regulations, which isn't true now.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Knew a person who refused to run A/C even when medically needed because they think it's their responsibility to prevent climate crisis.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Every stupid personal responsibility debate is to distract us from these global decisions we didn't enact or discuss and can't reverse alone

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The funny thing is, you could probably have both, but the billionaires don't like to spend money if it doesn't make half the value >

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

< of a small country by the end of the year.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

um not if the billionaires achieve semi immortality. then their self interest will finally align with sustainability!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The average US worker would need 10 times the length of all human history to earn as much as Jeff Bezos.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I choose Billionaires. Who am I to disagree with reality?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

We can probably have billionaires, though it's still a shocking waste. We definitely can't have hundred billionaires though.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Meh. False narrative. You CAN have billionaires AND a livable future. You just have to tax them properly. Make it expensive to hoard money.>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

> it'll force re-investment, increasing the speed of money, thus increasing everyone's quality of life. Like economists have said for ages.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We live in a weird time where being successful is bad.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes I'm sure the 0.00035% of the world's population that are "billionaires" are responsible for the climate "crisis."

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 21

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted May 24, 2023 11:36 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

According to that if you live in the US or the EU you're part of the problem. The "richest 10%" are people with a net income over $38,000...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

... and the richest 1% are $109,000. So the problem is the hundreds and hundreds of millions making up the middle class, not the mere...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

...2800 billionaires on the planet.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Yes. I'm not sure why that's controversial. They run businesses that exploit everything including the environment to make their billions.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Another political tweet circle jerk. This is just objectively not true. Ridiculously wealthy have existed since the dawn of civilization

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Can they at least pay taxes please?

4 years ago | Likes 204 Dislikes 4

4 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Musky paid $11b in taxes recently. It's not the individuals that matter. It's the companies. Tesla, like fuckloads of others, paid $0.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

11b is not his fair share, didn’t he make 30+ billion in one day or something like that?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They need to do more than that

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That would cut into the bribe money though.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So the government can have more stolen money to accelerate climate change with?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's not that I disagree, but when so much tax revenue is merely allocated to "defense" and subsidizing privatization, what good is it?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We don't merely need fair or higher taxes. We need a responsible Congress that can draft a budget that actually helps people. So: we fukt.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. The people who are supposed to hold the rich accountable are the ones enabling them to hoard wealth.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Too late. Get the axes.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No ❤️

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What makes you think they don't pay taxes?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

In terms of impact to quality of life, they pay effectively 0%. A person in the lowest tax bracket is MASSIVELY impacted by their taxes.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Well they don’t pay anywhere close to as much as I do as a percent of income. I’d guess half to a third as much.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

And that’s the ones that don’t hide their income offshore or in tax avoidance schemes.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I don't want a situation where nobody can be rich, just one where nobody can be poor. Not "I have to put off car repairs" poor, just "I get

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I want a situation where nobody can be rich and nobody has to put off car repairs.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Socialism is probably your best bet, then. That or communism.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

communism means everyone is poor. its the most corrupt model

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah. Then I guess I'm a socialist. Although a lot of people would call me a filthy commie for wanting to help the poor.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't have a problem if you're making ~$1mil a year. But beyond that, you're rapidly moving into scumlord territory.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just want the kind of poor that leads to people being homeless not to exist anymore. Guess I'm a filthy socialist who hates America.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah I mean, we literally idolize people who have hoarded so much wealth that it's gone well past unethical into straight murder.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Somebody did some figuring and found that the dragon from The Hobbit had about $51.4 billion worth of gold. This would make him the 15th

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

richest person in the world, if he were real. 14 people are richer than a dragon with a mountain literally filled with gold.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

food from the trash and live in a cardboard box" poor.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

See, at this point... I think we should just say no Rich people. Just period. Concentration of wealth always leads to bad things.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How about, whenever someone reaches $1 billion, all their money goes to charity and they get a plaque that says "I won capitalism!"

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Can you imagine how many tax increases rich people would favor if they were desperate to avoid the "I won capitalism" cutoff?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd rather everything over 999,999,999 go to UBI so we can have Star Trek in real life.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd be down for that too. Either way, the rich would be absolutely desperate to stay under $999 million.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Having billionaires isn’t the problem. It is how they became billionaires that is the problem.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Having billionaires is also a problem. Extreme income & wealth inequality are a problem. Plus there are no good ways to become a billionaire

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Both of which are how they got billions. If those issues were missing then your opinion of then would change for the better.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No it wouldn't. If you have a billion dollars, through ANY means, and you keep it? You're morally bankrupt. Period.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Nope, I didn’t say through any means, but rather stated plainly through honest means. I object to how most/all have so far achieved it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't care HOW you got the billions, if you keep it, you're morally bankrupt. It's that simple. I thought I made that very clear.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't understand what you are saying here.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What if they paid more then their fat of taxes and still have billions, would that alter your opinion?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about if they paid a fair share to all who work under them? Would that too alter your opinion?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Changing our views to match facts and not our bias will help in getting more support and solve the problems we face.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To which facts do you refer? "Having billionaires isn't the problem" is an opinion, not a fact, but I don't see it is based on facts either.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The problem you have with them is how they achieved it. Would you have the same issue if they paid their fair share in taxes and …

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You don't get to decide what I think. Yes, I would still have an issue with massive wealth inequality even if tax rates were changed.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Paid a great wage to all those under them?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If taxes were much higher at the top and wages were much higher at the bottom, massive income and wealth disparities would be reduced.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then they wouldn't be billionaires.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pop quiz: which single person has taken the most action to help us transition to sustainable energy so that we can have a livable future?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Musk, who could have saved MANY THOUSANDS of lives with his money, instead decided to spend it on Twitter stock, to protect his shit takes.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How many lives are saved by not breathing in car exhaust every year? How many by autopilot? Safest cars ever tested. Get real.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, you can't be talking about Musk, who has also single-handidly ruined his company's image and consistently pisses off its customers.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Weird how they sell every car they make and can't even begin to satisfy the huge amount of global demand huh?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Did he though? Or was that his employees? You ever seen him build a Tesla? Or a rocket for that matter?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's a different debate but let's say you're right. Does he not get credit for being the guy to drop the money needed to get it done?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, because he got it through exploiting the working class and he's hoarding most of it. No credit for doing the bare minimum.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No one else stepped up and did the needful. That's the point. Everything you're saying applies to all billionaires.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one else can because billionaires are hoarding all the money that we make for them.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be his investors and Tesla shareholders fronting the capital. He's just a manager in a publicly traded company. Worth $200b? Nah

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who do you think fronted the most capital, especially at first? And now it's clear to me just how little you know about his role.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am interested in the answer!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't say his name here without being tarred and feathered, but I can say that 2/3 of all EVs sold in the US come from one of his companies

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Get back to me when he let's him workers unionize.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They are free to do so at any time. They're also the highest paid in their industry and have already chosen not to unionize once.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Oh, it's actual mental illness. My apologies. I hope your new medication works.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Evs are still only 4.5% of US total market so unless he releases a Tesla for the avg person, it means shit

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then you'll be happy to learn they are growing insanely fast and plan on making 20 mil cars per year by 2030

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Musk plans on doing XYZ and barely gets X out, he overpromises and underperforms like he always does

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you’re talking about Elon Musk. Not really true. Not saying what he did isn’t impressive or somewhat useful. But not high impact.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And ultimately it’s really about money. If he could have made more money burning fossil fuels, he would have in a second.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't add up. Tesla lost money for the first decade or so of its existence. Almost went bankrupt several times.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How is being the reason anyone in the world is even trying to make EVs not high impact? Let alone being the single largest producer of them

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dunno, tell me when he starts filling out that "sustainable energy" part. Tesla Solar is a fuckin' dumpster fire of semi-illegal operations

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then why is it on my roof, generating all the power I need plus some for my neighbors? It's real, it's available now, and it is amazing

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And yet tons of COMPLETED INSTALLS are sitting with unpowered solar because Tesla can't finish out the fuckin' docs for MONTHS

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or when Tesla signs a contract with you and then DOUBLES THE PRICE when it's time to actually install it

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Billionaires are a symptom of a failing society.

4 years ago | Likes 457 Dislikes 19

Failing for...*checks notes* since babylon

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Every billionaire is a failure of fiscal policy.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

In the past Roosevelt vs Morgan was kind of an important court case. Monopolies provide a service, but only ever help very few profit.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To have such money only serves the purpose to be “the richest/most powerful/most renowned person”, it’s never to help others.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s a dragon sitting on piles of gold in a mountain.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both a symptom and a cause.

4 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 3

Like tumors

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like the world's worst feedback loop

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Historically, in terms of centuries, wealth is now more spread out than ever given the global middle class after the industrial revolution.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 46

Whats your point?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Historically, I doubt you’ve ever told the truth.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Doubt. What was the wealth distribution before the agricultural revolution?

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Because most of the world economy was a fuedal system with share cropping, aristocracy, etc. Look at cars. They have been around -->

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 23

And long time but it wasn't until the industrial revolution changed world economies and grew a middle class that the Model T happened.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 20

You don't seem to have any understanding of history at all.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

The middle class is dying as fast as it came in, in Canada anyways.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Source?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You're gonna need a source for that info, cuz its flat out wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Unregulated capitalism

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

To be fair this happenes too all systems using a currency

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Redundant adjective is redundant

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Scandinavia has well regulated capitalism and they're doing awesome

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True to an extent, regulated and monitored capitalism would be a better living for most but how long before it's corrupted with under the

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Table deals and lobbying

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Luckily, we already discovered the cure. Repeatedly.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Which is why USSR is still around and the CCP didn't cause a mass famine, population crisis (Look at the ratio of men to women in China.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That is the direct result of the 1 child policy.), and more?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Revolution you potato, not communism. Like what happened every time the wealthy got too wealthy. France. Germany. Russia. Spain.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The french revolution lead to instability at best and wild in-fighting/incompetence at worse. The German revolution that created the Weimar

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Republic was caused by WW1, not economic conditions on their own and the Weimar Republic didn't last long afterwards either. The USSR is not

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

A revolution is a rotation. A circle, ending where is began. It doesn't imply a 180, it's 360 per circle, right? We need to evolve.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fine, let's just Revolt./

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0