Their argument is "sure, but imagine how much worse it would be with socialism!" It's same argument texas repubs have run every election on. "Ok, crime, poverty, etc is on the rise. But imagine how much worse it'd be under dems!" Repubs have been in charge for 30 years and act like they're losing the right holding back a menace when really their policies cause the menace and they use it to justify cracking down on people more.
I mean, it's the same picture. Authoritarianism is absolutely here, healthcare almost no one can utilize is the same as no healthcare, and if free speech protections are constantly being infringed upon and seeing no punishment for doing so (which there aren't), then those protections functionally do not exist, because that is about as protective as a condom with a hole in it.
this cannot be upvoted, emphasized or disseminated widely enough. America was a closet police state before but it wasn't quite as intrusive. now, it's so blatant. AND, this is what the Second Amendment people were all saying they needed to keep their guns for. who knew they'd be the ones on the side of the Regime.
I mean, this IS what the founders intended this shit for, y'allqaeda nothwithstanding. Fucking Jefferson and his Tree of Liberty, etc. They would marvel and despair in equal how we haven't started stacking bodies yet.
afaik the bread lines only happened in the final years before the economical collapse of the USSR. The real issue with communism is the planned economy, which cannot provide for a fluctuating consumer market the way a market economy does. Luckily there is a very good in between system, the social market economy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_market_economy
Please, with the advances we made in predictive algorithms in the decades since the dissolution of the USSR, we could provide for everyone. If Amazon can micro-target personalised coffee mugs to people, why couldn't it be used for good? Multinational corporations are already managing massive internal economies from a central board. The idea that a planned economy is doomed to fail rather than merely infeasible with 20th century tech is capitalist propaganda.
Marxists distinguish between "private property" - the means of production being held in private hands even though they produce things for everyone - and "personal property" - stuff you have and hold for your own use. Communists want to get rid of the former. Capitalists want to get rid of the latter.
tps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Unity_Party_of_Germany">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Unity_Party_of_Germany It's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_socialism and I really don't need you to redefine my country's history to fit your worldview, we understand each other on that?
Theil is a hard right-wing republican who put JD Vance in office. Please show me evidence that he is backing ANY left-wing or even centrist think tank. I call bullshit.
NOT a think tank. A think tank is a research organization that studies topics like politics, economics, and science to give advice and shape public rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_tank
From the article: “While some of New Venture Fund’s grantees are left-leaning, others do not have a prominent ideological leaning,” Massoglia, an editorial and investigations manager at OpenSecrets, said in an email. “Some nonprofits also use New Venture Fund as a passthrough to fund other groups so it is not outside of the realm of possibility that Thiel’s foundation was funding a specific group through it.”
People confused nations that were dictatorships from the start as failed socialist states. The US is going to be in the same boat if we ever get out of this technocratic nightmare.
Technocracy is an expert-based type of governance. In its strongest sense, it is a form of government in which decisions across all sectors and policy domains follow evidence-based, efficiency-oriented procedures grounded in scientific methods and instrumental rationality."
Whatever you may think of it, I'm pretty sure the whole world would prefer if the US was a Technocracy instead of the Kakistocracy you guys have going on right now.
I want you to read that definition again, out loud this time, and tell me how *any* of that applies to the US right now. And the kiddiefucker crew are none of them experts or engineers or scientists of the sort who would staff a technocratic government.
Well for one Musk isn't an expert in fucking anything except spewing bullshit, and for another, how many of those three would you say, and I quote, "follow evidence-based, efficiency-oriented procedures"?
ESPECIALLY Musk. The man is a narcissist completely divorced from reality and his ego weighs far more than any kind of rationality or efficiency when he makes decisions.
"I've got a home and money for groceries, so food and housing are affordable. I've got a good insurance, so we have access to healthcare. Nothing happens to me for speaking my mind, so we have free speech. I haven't been targeted by cops, so we don't live in a police state. I can vote, so we don't live in authoritarianism. I believe the surveillance keeps me safe, so it's not a problem. I've seen protests and I haven't seen any politician ousted for corruption, so you're lying about those."
Yeah, that's exactly it. There are people who unironically think that way. "It doesn't affect me for now, so I'm not going to worry or believe your reasons for why I should worry." There are _still_ people who don't believe in climate change, because they don't _want_ to and the bad things that would force them haven't happened yet. And they don't give a shit that when the bad things happen it will be too late, because they don't _want_ to worry about it.
SecondSince
*sigh* Say it with me! Every accusation...
sadurdaynight
Their argument is "sure, but imagine how much worse it would be with socialism!" It's same argument texas repubs have run every election on. "Ok, crime, poverty, etc is on the rise. But imagine how much worse it'd be under dems!" Repubs have been in charge for 30 years and act like they're losing the right holding back a menace when really their policies cause the menace and they use it to justify cracking down on people more.
FinancialRavioli
*growing authoritarianism. *unaffordable healthcare. *constant infringement of free speech protections.
It's not quite what the list claims, yet, but they're sure as fuck working on it.
Zyrixion
I mean, it's the same picture. Authoritarianism is absolutely here, healthcare almost no one can utilize is the same as no healthcare, and if free speech protections are constantly being infringed upon and seeing no punishment for doing so (which there aren't), then those protections functionally do not exist, because that is about as protective as a condom with a hole in it.
NextPlayLive
1989
CorvidPrime
Yes, but they’re paying rednecks to hunt brown people, so all the folk who complained about socialism are okay with the situation.
Now there’s a sentence I never thought I’d have to say… This timeline blows.
wejustdontknow
Hey, they're also allowed to kill white people as long as they're "woke".
psmith00
this cannot be upvoted, emphasized or disseminated widely enough. America was a closet police state before but it wasn't quite as intrusive. now, it's so blatant. AND, this is what the Second Amendment people were all saying they needed to keep their guns for. who knew they'd be the ones on the side of the Regime.
Zyrixion
I mean, this IS what the founders intended this shit for, y'allqaeda nothwithstanding. Fucking Jefferson and his Tree of Liberty, etc. They would marvel and despair in equal how we haven't started stacking bodies yet.
LanceSackless
Its almost like shitty people will use the tools available to them to grab power
slack3rdav3
i just dont understand why 'no healthcare' would be under socialism.
monsteroflove
Come now! Under capitalism, at least you have billionaires that are completely unaccountable to anyone. See, that's the capitalist advantage.
pfwg4k4fcr8
Like 4 companies own everything it feels like
AgamemnonsMemes
/gallery/handful-of-companies-who-own-everything-mg1Ri
rydecker
Thanks Obama. The only man that can stop these problems is Mitch McConnell
Subsound
https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1eTZhNXdpNnh5MXE4dHZuejd6bjVxd3VsYjlwb2F1Y2RsNjduMnJ4MCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/29nDtEH1ViY8FcPeaV/200w.webp
JustFeedMePieDammit
Lol maybe we need to work on a plan C
CallMeCourierSix
Thanks for letting us know you're a Nazi.
Unless you were being sarcastic, in which case you need the /s, cause these days it's almost impossible to tell if this is real or not.
whyforetho
At least communism had housing and bread lines.
BillHubbard
afaik the bread lines only happened in the final years before the economical collapse of the USSR. The real issue with communism is the planned economy, which cannot provide for a fluctuating consumer market the way a market economy does.
Luckily there is a very good in between system, the social market economy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_market_economy
Allrighty
Please, with the advances we made in predictive algorithms in the decades since the dissolution of the USSR, we could provide for everyone. If Amazon can micro-target personalised coffee mugs to people, why couldn't it be used for good? Multinational corporations are already managing massive internal economies from a central board. The idea that a planned economy is doomed to fail rather than merely infeasible with 20th century tech is capitalist propaganda.
BillHubbard
Could be a nice experiment to try and predict consumption needs for a time, and see how the differences with reality are.
lastmanonearthbutidroppedmyglasses
And trains
killergrooves85
“You will own nothing and like it.” - Capitalism
Wait, what?! I thought that was communism!
Daliena06
Nono, see, communism is when nobody owns anything. Capitalism is when *you* don't own anything, but the billionaires do, so it's fine!
killergrooves85
Oh, ok. I don’t think I like that arrangement. But I’m sure they know best. They have so much stuff and I have so little.
Allrighty
Marxists distinguish between "private property" - the means of production being held in private hands even though they produce things for everyone - and "personal property" - stuff you have and hold for your own use. Communists want to get rid of the former. Capitalists want to get rid of the latter.
killergrooves85
Ah, that is very well explained. Thank you.
DrewThe3DPrinterGuy
This quote is attributed to the director of the CIA in the far off year 1989 I believe.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
agonarch
No it doesn't, that's why it's taking this approach, they're massively, impossibly outnumbered.
feelymcfeel
Looks like they won then.
Camelspotting
Zuck did what they could not.
Seethreepeeoh
Yeah, but did socialism create shareholder value? [aide whispers in ear] … never mind
EmanNiemThcin
Yes, just ask Ikea who used to have their products made by political prisoners in the GDR.
https://www.dw.com/en/ikea-to-compensate-east-german-prisoners-for-forced-labor/a-70633944
Seethreepeeoh
GDR was communist. (Not socialist) What would you call a company voluntarily committing millions?
EmanNiemThcin
tps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Unity_Party_of_Germany">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Unity_Party_of_Germany It's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_socialism and I really don't need you to redefine my country's history to fit your worldview, we understand each other on that?
EmanNiemThcin
As for your question: Busted.
Seethreepeeoh
It’s our country now
ImJustHereAtThisPoint
MrSatisify
Theil is a hard right-wing republican who put JD Vance in office. Please show me evidence that he is backing ANY left-wing or even centrist think tank. I call bullshit.
LanceSackless
Ezra klein’s abundance bs is funded by theil and other right wing ghouls
ImJustHereAtThisPoint
https://www.wired.com/story/leak-exposes-members-of-peter-thiels-secretive-dialog-society
He's absolutely influencing "left wing" political figures and celebrities
MrSatisify
NOT a think tank. A think tank is a research organization that studies topics like politics, economics, and science to give advice and shape public rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_tank
ImJustHereAtThisPoint
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/28/peter-thiel-nonprofit-apparently-donated-to-left-leaning-group.html
MrSatisify
From the article: “While some of New Venture Fund’s grantees are left-leaning, others do not have a prominent ideological leaning,” Massoglia, an editorial and investigations manager at OpenSecrets, said in an email. “Some nonprofits also use New Venture Fund as a passthrough to fund other groups so it is not outside of the realm of possibility that Thiel’s foundation was funding a specific group through it.”
ThanosDei
People confused nations that were dictatorships from the start as failed socialist states. The US is going to be in the same boat if we ever get out of this technocratic nightmare.
MCFLYYY
Yep this list is a list of things that happen under authoritarian regimes, not socialist ones. Propaganda works.
Daliena06
"Technocratic"?
Technocracy is an expert-based type of governance. In its strongest sense, it is a form of government in which decisions across all sectors and policy domains follow evidence-based, efficiency-oriented procedures grounded in scientific methods and instrumental rationality."
Whatever you may think of it, I'm pretty sure the whole world would prefer if the US was a Technocracy instead of the Kakistocracy you guys have going on right now.
ThanosDei
Our govt is being steered by Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg. How is that not a technocracy?
Zyrixion
I want you to read that definition again, out loud this time, and tell me how *any* of that applies to the US right now. And the kiddiefucker crew are none of them experts or engineers or scientists of the sort who would staff a technocratic government.
Daliena06
Well for one Musk isn't an expert in fucking anything except spewing bullshit, and for another, how many of those three would you say, and I quote, "follow evidence-based, efficiency-oriented procedures"?
ESPECIALLY Musk. The man is a narcissist completely divorced from reality and his ego weighs far more than any kind of rationality or efficiency when he makes decisions.
ThanosDei
Its not about what the real definition of the word means. Its about how they see themselves.
SecondSince
No, you fucking idiot. Words have meaning, they're not whatever you wish them to be!
Daliena06
.. Seriously? We're going with "Actual reality doesn't matter, it's the delusions of some of the worst people on the planet that matters"?
XXXSpork
“But at least the people I hate are worse off than me!” -the utterly deranged
Frenchgeek
"Hating yourself is not an healthy coping mechanism."
wejustdontknow
"If you're not doing anything wrong, you don't need to worry." Hyuk hyuk.
WoeToHice
"I've got a home and money for groceries, so food and housing are affordable. I've got a good insurance, so we have access to healthcare. Nothing happens to me for speaking my mind, so we have free speech. I haven't been targeted by cops, so we don't live in a police state. I can vote, so we don't live in authoritarianism. I believe the surveillance keeps me safe, so it's not a problem. I've seen protests and I haven't seen any politician ousted for corruption, so you're lying about those."
XXXSpork
Reminds me of this
WoeToHice
Yeah, that's exactly it. There are people who unironically think that way. "It doesn't affect me for now, so I'm not going to worry or believe your reasons for why I should worry." There are _still_ people who don't believe in climate change, because they don't _want_ to and the bad things that would force them haven't happened yet. And they don't give a shit that when the bad things happen it will be too late, because they don't _want_ to worry about it.