The United States of Propaganda

Jul 28, 2026 3:01 PM

*sigh* Say it with me! Every accusation...

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Their argument is "sure, but imagine how much worse it would be with socialism!" It's same argument texas repubs have run every election on. "Ok, crime, poverty, etc is on the rise. But imagine how much worse it'd be under dems!" Repubs have been in charge for 30 years and act like they're losing the right holding back a menace when really their policies cause the menace and they use it to justify cracking down on people more.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*growing authoritarianism. *unaffordable healthcare. *constant infringement of free speech protections.

It's not quite what the list claims, yet, but they're sure as fuck working on it.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, it's the same picture. Authoritarianism is absolutely here, healthcare almost no one can utilize is the same as no healthcare, and if free speech protections are constantly being infringed upon and seeing no punishment for doing so (which there aren't), then those protections functionally do not exist, because that is about as protective as a condom with a hole in it.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1989

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but they’re paying rednecks to hunt brown people, so all the folk who complained about socialism are okay with the situation.

Now there’s a sentence I never thought I’d have to say… This timeline blows.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Hey, they're also allowed to kill white people as long as they're "woke".

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

this cannot be upvoted, emphasized or disseminated widely enough. America was a closet police state before but it wasn't quite as intrusive. now, it's so blatant. AND, this is what the Second Amendment people were all saying they needed to keep their guns for. who knew they'd be the ones on the side of the Regime.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, this IS what the founders intended this shit for, y'allqaeda nothwithstanding. Fucking Jefferson and his Tree of Liberty, etc. They would marvel and despair in equal how we haven't started stacking bodies yet.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its almost like shitty people will use the tools available to them to grab power

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i just dont understand why 'no healthcare' would be under socialism.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Come now! Under capitalism, at least you have billionaires that are completely unaccountable to anyone. See, that's the capitalist advantage.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like 4 companies own everything it feels like

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks Obama. The only man that can stop these problems is Mitch McConnell

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

Lol maybe we need to work on a plan C

2 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks for letting us know you're a Nazi.

Unless you were being sarcastic, in which case you need the /s, cause these days it's almost impossible to tell if this is real or not.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least communism had housing and bread lines.

3 days ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

afaik the bread lines only happened in the final years before the economical collapse of the USSR. The real issue with communism is the planned economy, which cannot provide for a fluctuating consumer market the way a market economy does.
Luckily there is a very good in between system, the social market economy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_market_economy

2 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Please, with the advances we made in predictive algorithms in the decades since the dissolution of the USSR, we could provide for everyone. If Amazon can micro-target personalised coffee mugs to people, why couldn't it be used for good? Multinational corporations are already managing massive internal economies from a central board. The idea that a planned economy is doomed to fail rather than merely infeasible with 20th century tech is capitalist propaganda.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could be a nice experiment to try and predict consumption needs for a time, and see how the differences with reality are.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And trains

3 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

“You will own nothing and like it.” - Capitalism

Wait, what?! I thought that was communism!

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Nono, see, communism is when nobody owns anything. Capitalism is when *you* don't own anything, but the billionaires do, so it's fine!

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, ok. I don’t think I like that arrangement. But I’m sure they know best. They have so much stuff and I have so little.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Marxists distinguish between "private property" - the means of production being held in private hands even though they produce things for everyone - and "personal property" - stuff you have and hold for your own use. Communists want to get rid of the former. Capitalists want to get rid of the latter.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, that is very well explained. Thank you.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This quote is attributed to the director of the CIA in the far off year 1989 I believe.

3 days ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 days ago (deleted Jul 28, 2026 9:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 days ago (deleted Jul 28, 2026 9:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No it doesn't, that's why it's taking this approach, they're massively, impossibly outnumbered.

2 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Looks like they won then.

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Zuck did what they could not.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but did socialism create shareholder value? [aide whispers in ear] … never mind

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes, just ask Ikea who used to have their products made by political prisoners in the GDR.
https://www.dw.com/en/ikea-to-compensate-east-german-prisoners-for-forced-labor/a-70633944

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

GDR was communist. (Not socialist) What would you call a company voluntarily committing millions?

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

tps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Unity_Party_of_Germany">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Unity_Party_of_Germany It's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_socialism and I really don't need you to redefine my country's history to fit your worldview, we understand each other on that?

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As for your question: Busted.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s our country now

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

Theil is a hard right-wing republican who put JD Vance in office. Please show me evidence that he is backing ANY left-wing or even centrist think tank. I call bullshit.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Ezra klein’s abundance bs is funded by theil and other right wing ghouls

2 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

https://www.wired.com/story/leak-exposes-members-of-peter-thiels-secretive-dialog-society

He's absolutely influencing "left wing" political figures and celebrities

3 days ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

NOT a think tank. A think tank is a research organization that studies topics like politics, economics, and science to give advice and shape public rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_tank

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

From the article: “While some of New Venture Fund’s grantees are left-leaning, others do not have a prominent ideological leaning,” Massoglia, an editorial and investigations manager at OpenSecrets, said in an email. “Some nonprofits also use New Venture Fund as a passthrough to fund other groups so it is not outside of the realm of possibility that Thiel’s foundation was funding a specific group through it.”

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

People confused nations that were dictatorships from the start as failed socialist states. The US is going to be in the same boat if we ever get out of this technocratic nightmare.

3 days ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Yep this list is a list of things that happen under authoritarian regimes, not socialist ones. Propaganda works.

3 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

"Technocratic"?

Technocracy is an expert-based type of governance. In its strongest sense, it is a form of government in which decisions across all sectors and policy domains follow evidence-based, efficiency-oriented procedures grounded in scientific methods and instrumental rationality."

Whatever you may think of it, I'm pretty sure the whole world would prefer if the US was a Technocracy instead of the Kakistocracy you guys have going on right now.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Our govt is being steered by Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg. How is that not a technocracy?

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I want you to read that definition again, out loud this time, and tell me how *any* of that applies to the US right now. And the kiddiefucker crew are none of them experts or engineers or scientists of the sort who would staff a technocratic government.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well for one Musk isn't an expert in fucking anything except spewing bullshit, and for another, how many of those three would you say, and I quote, "follow evidence-based, efficiency-oriented procedures"?

ESPECIALLY Musk. The man is a narcissist completely divorced from reality and his ego weighs far more than any kind of rationality or efficiency when he makes decisions.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Its not about what the real definition of the word means. Its about how they see themselves.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

No, you fucking idiot. Words have meaning, they're not whatever you wish them to be!

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

.. Seriously? We're going with "Actual reality doesn't matter, it's the delusions of some of the worst people on the planet that matters"?

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

“But at least the people I hate are worse off than me!” -the utterly deranged

3 days ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 1

"Hating yourself is not an healthy coping mechanism."

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"If you're not doing anything wrong, you don't need to worry." Hyuk hyuk.

3 days ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

"I've got a home and money for groceries, so food and housing are affordable. I've got a good insurance, so we have access to healthcare. Nothing happens to me for speaking my mind, so we have free speech. I haven't been targeted by cops, so we don't live in a police state. I can vote, so we don't live in authoritarianism. I believe the surveillance keeps me safe, so it's not a problem. I've seen protests and I haven't seen any politician ousted for corruption, so you're lying about those."

3 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of this

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's exactly it. There are people who unironically think that way. "It doesn't affect me for now, so I'm not going to worry or believe your reasons for why I should worry." There are _still_ people who don't believe in climate change, because they don't _want_ to and the bad things that would force them haven't happened yet. And they don't give a shit that when the bad things happen it will be too late, because they don't _want_ to worry about it.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0