Worth a try

Jul 11, 2022 3:43 AM

PatThaiCM

Views

127752

Likes

2468

Dislikes

74

Pffft you think they read that thing?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Bible also has stuff about paying debts, but forgiving the unpaid balance after 7 years. How about we just do that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If dems make something a law obviously basing on the Bible text, wouldn't that let gop make 1000 shitty Bible laws in response on precedent?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That could lead to dangerous territory re "You may charge a foreigner interest, but you may not charge your brother interest" Deut 23:19

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm still waiting for the GQP to introduce bills criminalizing adultery and coveting.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Anyone know that passage?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, because they totally abide by that "Thou Shalt Not Kill" commandment as they cheer on the death penalty.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The word used is murder. It is only used in examples of premeditated killing with malice

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The hypocrisy is a feature.

4 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Not to harvest the edge of their fields so the poor would always have food to eat, was one of my favorites. Charity with dignity.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This logic is decently sound. The Bible says Christians should not charge a fellow Christian interest. And if we are a “Christian” nation.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's cute that people think Republicans give a shit about hypocrisy.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Playing rhetorical gotcha games with fascists is a waste of time. They only respond to power in the form of violence (or the threat thereof)

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

https://youtu.be/wmVkJvieaOA this is a good video about exactly why gotcha doesn't work against the fascists

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly true. Which is why I believe the US is headed toward a division of states that may or moy not lead to actual civil war.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are no student loans in the Bible…… see where I’m going with this

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Like the GOP actually gives a shit, they just cherry pick and alter what they want. You can't make them see the "error of their ways" as --

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

-- they're either too dumb or already know it's wrong and don't care because they benefit from the misinfo.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not worth the try because that's Jewish stuff, not Christian, and they will make the distinction clear. Also even in Judaism that only

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

applies during the jubilee which is only when Moshiach comes and rebuilds the temple, which is something they disagree with also.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Just for further reference, Moshiach in Judaism is explicitly not Jesus and this is why they don't like the Jews.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Dems about to bring a bible to a bible fight. About fucking time.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And all loans are forgiven after 7 years.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hmm ... glad that you pointed that out!

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

Accurate ref, AND worked in Mr. Pointy!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The bible also states every seven years they forgive all debts!!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nice try, but the GQP would just say, "Don't be silly, we all know THAT part is wrong." And go skipping merrily off>

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fun fact, this is where the Jewish banker stereotype comes from. Christians couldn't do it (sin of usury) so Jewish communities did.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They’re just be like, you’re right the government can’t then privatize things even more

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They already found ways around the no-interest thing: fees. The end result is identical, but technically there was no interest charged.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would any lender loan money if they made nothing doing it. They'd be hiring people to manage lending products buy make nothing from it.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In essence taking a loss. Loans would stop. You'd need cash to buy your car., house, no credit cards..just debit. The economy would crash.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No interest on loans sounds great but no one give you $30k of their money to pay back in 5 years if you're paying back just what they lent.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They will just say it doesnt apply to that soecific part of the bible. Cherry picking is what they do

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we can go further, no student loan interest, no mortgage interest, no credit card interest

4 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 3

Every seven years all debt is wiped out.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know who Jesus is on record for hating? The moneylenders. Royally fucked up their merch stands.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Then we wouldn't have loans anymore at all. Companies need to make money in order to exist.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

i have zero problem with a company making money, just the debt industry is predatory about it and keep people impoverished

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im sure we can use our imagination and find better ways to do things, but people over profits should always be #1 priority

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'd love to hear something better than mortgages for home-buying. I can't think of a better way to manage that. Same with student loans tbh

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be a great idea if they actually cared about the things they say they care about and weren't just using those things to justify

4 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 4

Bigotry, dominion over women and generally facist beliefs.

4 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

We circle jerk ourselves here (I do it too) that we'll be able to come up with an argument that's logically strong enough that ...1/2...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...2/2...the cult will be persuaded, forgetting that they didn't arrive at any of their positions logically

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The point is exposing their hypocrisy as much as possibly so you can later throw it back in their face.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

More realistically they would use it to successfully throw Dems our by saying Dem policy would end all loans. Buying a car/house....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

...would take full payment in cash because no one would loan money.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

How much more hypocrisy can we expose? The people who need convincing will just ignore it.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Which, again, would be great if they cared about their own hypocrisy

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Yeah exactly. The orange man literally contradicted his hypocrisy every day. You think anyone in the GQP cared?

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Tbf it would kill the economy. There would be no reason for any lender to manage and pay for infrastructure to loan money and track it.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Dude, literally one bad news day "kills the economy" so you will have to forgive me for thinking that excuse is bs...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're equating "kill the economy" differently if you're seeing a "bad news day" as the same as only cash purchases for cars, homes, etc.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are just underestimating the ability of "the economy" to adjust to changes as it has literally done regularly throughout history

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Naah, only buying a car or home with cash....no credit cards, no loans, etc; is much different than "a bad news day" on economy

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck it. Im up for that. Bye bye economy

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lol....You first....throw all your money away now. Leave the internet because you can't pay your bill. etc. Don't wait for the rest of us.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Deal, you next.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol...Naah. Not me. You're the one wanting see the economy crash. So show us how you deal without it. So burn that cash and leave the 'net.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You still on? Haven't trashed your account yet?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They will argue that way, then argue a different way when it suits them. Outing them as hypocrites means nothing.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Shit why just student loans? No interest on mortgage loans either.

4 years ago | Likes 750 Dislikes 7

We should be like, it is against my religion to pay interest on anything. Would it not be a religious right?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But how are the billionaires going to pay for their 4th mansion? Wont anyone think of the billionaires?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Credit cards

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And it's not "wait for the Dems", it's us. We need to litigate. Dems as a political party are still capitalists

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those are private loans. Government can’t alter a private contract. But federal students loans, they can.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Credit cards are a type of loan too.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Then how will the rich stay rich? They have no actual skills, just the ability to loan money out.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Student loans are largely financed by the gov, so it would b more@in line for jst them

4 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

the federal reserve will have to lower it's interest rate to banks to 0 as well.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

it would destroy the economy but i think that's exactly the point,... following the teachings of a death cult is a bad idea.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do it as separate laws so they have to argue it several times.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And every 50 years just completely cancel ALL debts

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Enjoy saving up the full cost of a house before you can buy one.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And a car.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ban all personal interest. It should only be for corporations. Loan sharking the poor is pure evil.

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

So lenders would do personal loans out of kindness? I agree high interest is loan sharking but no interest means no loans.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

You have the default on the debt

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why would any lender pay for the infrastructure around loaning money and tracking it. Loans would stop. You'd need cash to buy a house

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

The economy would plumet and even Dems would toss Dems our if no one could get a car or personal loan because no lenders.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lookup Muslim loans. They don't allow interest. This is already a thing in other countries.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In new New Zealand student loans are interest free. Its great.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure. Student loans. I can't see all loans though. Like cat loans.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah or house loans..imagine how good that would be.. we have paid more in interest then paying off the house so far. Succks.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Cat loans lol ..

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The government could lend that cash for buying houses, just like they make 1% loans to banks now.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You want the government (you) to take on the risk of people not paying back $300k loans? A government loans to buy cars too?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There only practical difference between the government lending to banks and lending to people directly is the mark-up for profitability. 1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the banks can lend money and make a profit, the government should be able to at least break even. 2/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And do it for free?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sure, why not? Our taxes already bailed out wall street and big banks when they bundled high-risk. Why not just cut out the middle-man?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1