AIPAC Dems chairing MENA decisions

Aug 27, 2026 5:11 AM

purpledd

Views

5354

Likes

228

Dislikes

8

https://x.com/brhodes/status/2092423534899515552

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/27/pro-israel-democrats-picked-for-top-roles-on-key-us-house-committee

This fucking sucks. But bow you'll have idiots refuse to vote in midterms and hand shit to Republicans again

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Make their lives hell.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

republicans see that and are trying to foment it. I say, foment in the primaries...

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 0

There isn't a growing divide among voters. 70% of Democratic voters are polled as having an unfavorable view of Israel, and that number is going up. The growing divide is between Americans and the people who take money from a genocidal terrorist state that kills innocent children for flying kites.

3 days ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Well it's growing in the sense that 70% will be 80% by next year and it was like 50% not even a few years ago. There has been a seismic shift on Israeli sentiment within the Democratic party and even the GOP (though their side can largely be explained by overt antisemitism)

But yes, you should be deeply concerned about the party tripling down on Israel after Kamala arguably blew a win on not stopping the genocide.

3 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Why would any reasonable person be pro-Israel? Israel is perpetrating genocide, and doing it in the most evil ways.

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Americans aren't reasonable people though. They attack others and lie about it. When you point it out, they have a meltdown and start playing victim.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sad but true.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Disagree with this all you want, but this is exactly what Republicans want Democrats to be doing again right before an election. They can't win on their merits, so they get us at each other's throats. All they need to do is get enough of their 'RINOs' to decide that Democrats are too chaotic to vote for or enough Democrats to vote for some third party stooge.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I don't get it. Moskowitz used to be cool

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, you're worried about an on-going genocide these members are being paid to fund and support? Well what about a twitch streamer that got clipped? What do you have to say about that, huh? (veeeeery /s)

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Shit like this is why I don't feel an ounce of doubt about returning a nearly blank ballot in November. Both my Dem senator and representative can fuck themselves to death with their AIPAC and corporate money.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why you have to vote out every Establishment candidate.
Because they don't want the status quo to change, so voting them in will accomplish nothing.
They need to be replaced by Progressive faction candidates, because they want to actually fix things.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"who else you going to vote for? The evil children?"

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 0

If she was a man she was beaten with an ugly stick.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Oh the same woman who simped for Hillary Clinton at the detriment of the country?

3 days ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Cannot believe she got elected after resigning in disgrace. How?? I mean Florida, but still.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct! She was previously the head of the DNC during Clinton's presidential bid.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah yes! The same one!

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Traitors

3 days ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 4

Bought and paid for. Disgusting

3 days ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Probably blackmailed for doing shitty stuff too, yay!

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

Jesus wept, that's a lot of money!

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm just surprised this guy cost this much. They usually get away much cheaper

3 days ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I'd be wary of "independent expenditures" but it doesn't really make a difference.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He clearly played hard ball with them.

3 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

We need to get the Zionist out of government

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Jeffries chairs the Democratic Steering Committee (assign reps to committees). If the Dems flip the house, and he becomes Speaker, depending on the partisan split, and # of new progressives, Jeffries will be forced to make deals with progressives or refuse and soil his legacy, possibly ousted like McCarthy

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh he's already shot his legacy dead. No one likes him.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Seriously, again, there should be no private funding for politicians, zero, zilch, nada. Money is never ever free.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm so lost on acronyms and it's not cool. I can't tell what's good or bad until the thing is spelled out. Comes from working with tire codes and order sheets. Oy

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's fair. AIPAC is basically the Israel institute to bribe politicians in the USA. Foreign Affairs MENA is Middle East and North Africa - basically the people guiding government policy in the geographic region of Israel. So this is more news of Israel's government influencing the USA government organs to grant it protection as it continues a genocide in Palestine.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"American Israel Public Affairs Committee" It's Israel's American propaganda branch.
They lobby and pay off politicians to do what is in Israel's best interest.
And they are one of the one of the largest donor organisations for politicians.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I’ve seen a clip of New York mayor candidates being asked “where would you travel first as the mayor?” Every single one of them said something along the lines of “reinforcing the relationship between us and Israel”, except Mamdani who pointed out that he’s applying to a job to fix problems in New York and he will stay there for the most part. I’ve sometimes thought that the Israel influence on US politics is a bit exaggerated but Jesus Christ, even the question seemed set up for asslicking.

3 days ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 1

Jesus christ indeed. the last time he travelled to Israeli

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's a filter question, there for just that purpose.

3 days ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I don't think we've had any real idea just how far up America's ass Israel's dick is until this presidency. We've known it's not great, but holy shit, we're basically just an overgrown Israeli propaganda asset at this point. It's fucking pathetic.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Honestly, at this point are you surprised? The Dems have always been like this.

3 days ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 8

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 days ago (deleted Aug 27, 2026 2:23 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The worst part about democracy is the democracy.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's not rly surprise my friend, it is calling them out for what they are ! For decades nobody said much about AIPAC, everybody knew but there was no outrage.
So no, nobody is surprised. This is simply calling them out. They are complicit in a genocide.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

AIPAC was significantly less influential decades ago - since Citizens United, they've ramped up spending significantly. Israel was influential, but that's in large part because the voters - not the politicians - broadly supported Israel. Now there's a disconnect where voters don't but politicians do.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Both Biden and Harris were strongly supporting Israel this time two years ago or as every other political post on this woe begotten neolib echo chamber remembers it 'LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALA."

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It's the problem with the Establishment faction which controls the leadership positions.
They are status quo politically, they do not want things to really change.
Especially when it comes to Economics and Foreign policy.
Only the Progressive faction is trying to fix things.

3 days ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Well thanks to DSA wins the progressive faction has expanded from about six people to twelve. I'm exaggerating...barely.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but those twelve are spread across all levels of government, in multiple states.
So while it's a good sign, it's like throwing a stone in the ocean, sure it makes a splash but it hasn't changed much.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Debbie looking like the Joker's tired aunt and with just as much moral fortitude as her nephew.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

That woman should not be in the party, period. She's been nothing but a shitstain on the Democrat name her entire career. The fact that she's a representative is even more appalling 'cuz no sane Democrat would vote for her.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone ready for a Third Party or we still doing "Blue no matter who"?

3 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I'm for DSA cannibalizing the Democratic party. Don't leave them with any infrastructure.

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

That would be great if our system specifically didn't make that almost impossible. The best case is DS dems getting voted into office more and the Dem party moving left. Unlikely but the best path probably.

3 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Dems only “vote blue no matter who” when it’s a corpo shill. When someone like a DSA candidate gets through so much as a primary, they start wailing and gnashing their teeth that the party is being taken over, or most generously treated as a fluke.

Shills like Hakeem “I’ve tried nothing and run out of ideas” Jeffries will stare you down and say he doesn’t see Mamdani as the future of the party. Of course, Mamdani still endorsed the fuck recently, so…. Yeah.

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Yes it still blue no matter who. Get out of your bubble. Doesn't matter if your candidate is moderate or DSA, if they are a D running against an R vote the D.

Crazy this conversation still needs to be had after 10 fucking years of Trump and T controlled legislature

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

"My grades aren't as bad as the kid who sniffs glue all day so I don't have to change.''-ass mentality

3 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

"I know we've been saying this for a decade straight now and it worked once only because the glue sniffer personally farted on everyone one time but I swear it's a winning message for the fourth time trust me bro"

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How do you think Trump keeps beating Dems

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

He doesn't "keep" beating dems. He's won twice and lost once. 2016 was in a large part due to anti establishment sentiment, but I would argue Comey's press conf. Set him over the edge. And 2024 was the economy and Bidens poor debate performance.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Trump is one of the least popular presidents of all time. Generic ballots have Dems up by double digit margins. Yet, they lost twice. How?

I'll give you a hint. It's not *just* because Biden ratfucked 2024; it's also because Kamala was a bad candidate and ran a bad campaign and deliberately chose unpopular positions to run against Trump on. Don't try to outflank him on building "the most lethal military" or border security or any of that shit. And stop campaigning with Cheneys!

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dems lose because they keep trying to be Republicans and Republicans aren't that fucking stupid and Dems actually demand some quality from their elected leaders! It isn't rocket science.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0