Reply to a FP post this past week

Mar 9, 2017 4:58 PM

DanTuker

Views

60442

Likes

515

Dislikes

106

Classic imgur. This was the one post raising awareness of a female issue on IWD, the rest were negative posts, and it has to get "debunked".

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 3

Still think that birth control should be easier to get for people with financial issues.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It also keeps old men from accidentally rolling out of bed in the middle of the night

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Birth control is so much cheaper for insurance cos and the gvmt than rampant baby making; it makes no sense NOT to support it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep. Not to mention it prevents unwanted pregnancies, therefore lowering the amount of abortions some people have such a problem with

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rite Aid/accounts payable doesn't know & doesn't care what the diagnosis is, only what's on the scrip.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Some want to ban BC though it is oft prescribed by doctors due to menstrual problems (excessive blood loss is common). Do some research @OP.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

@OP the numbers she cited is DoD spending on it. You're response is mistaken, and doesn't address her argument.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I cannot comment on woman's poster but the response is absolutely wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

'Get it out of pocket'. LOL

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I usually get off in-pocket

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except the religious exemption for providing birth control extends to when it's prescribed for medical reasons. Her argument still stands.

9 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 7

Except the number she's using is for DOD Tricare which also covers BC as well for any reason.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 20

TLDR; too busy trying to pulverise planned parenthood with my patently perfidious polarised partisan prejudice.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Holy alliteration batman!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I definitely hit up thesaurus.com for that comment :P

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fuck i don't even care what the pills are for, both viagra/cialis and birth control should be covered regardless. sex isn't a bad thing!!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That's part of the problem, you should care. Because a lot of the time it's not about sex, it's about PCOS or hormone imbalances or pain 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Part of the reason why politicians don't endorse the pill is because there's a shit stigma behind it that it's for sluts. Same as abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

i said they SHOULD be covered. i wish the stigma didn't exist, that it wasn't an issue if it was for sex or not. my bc is covered (for now)-

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

--i use it only as birth control, and i want it to stay that way. i don't want access to only exist for people who are able to prove to --

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

--politicians or w/e that it's not to enable their 'sluttiness'. i wish the weird attitudes our society has around sex didn't exist, and --

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is only one case for a pregnancy fathered by god. And that is not even clearly confirmed.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah and in that story he up and left her to raise the baby with another man.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you refering to Zeus getting with Alcmene or Zeus and IO or really Zeus and everyone

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wong statement.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 9

v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Thavage

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

More like Wang statement amirite?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Wong made statement about wang

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Hmmm. Rearry wong indee.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

HAH! IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE WE'RE RACIST!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

This just in: condescending mansplainer is wrong, shockingly.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Viagra keeps people alive in our ICU. It's life saving plus score for boners.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Her face is giving me limp dick

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It also helps with depression from what i hear.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I mean, sex is a pretty good antidepressant

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Only if you're getting the sex.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Lagies and gemtlemen, i found todays fucking dick.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

How so? I'm getting a divorce and haven't been laid in three years. But yeah, that makes me a dick.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Sorry man, i didnt know.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Feminists don't acknowledge facts because those are of the patriarchy

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

You are about as bad the the rest of them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Translated "you think for yourself instead of buying into what someone else tells you". Got it. thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I meant you are as bad as the feminazies. And no, if you frequent imgur and this is your opinion, you're just as brainwashed as tumblr crap.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

What if I told you that everything about the reply post is factually incorrect?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Pretty sure it's a jab at how birth control can help with ovarian conditions but has a lot of issues regarding insurance coverage.

9 years ago | Likes 264 Dislikes 8

Well, I think it used to. And now it will be, again.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I get cysts. I need birth control. If they take it away i will personally shit on each of their lawns.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I can send over some bran muffins if you ever need help.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I love bran muffins. They help me poop. <3

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup. My sister has an ovarian cyst and all the docs tell her she needs the pill.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Can attest that I was on Yasmin for almost a decade for PCOS and it basically solved everything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had one that bled into my stomach. I'd rather be called a slut for taking birth control than vomiting uncontrollably every month.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Wait is the pill not easily available (re; insurance) in the states?

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Ignore them, birth control is like $9 a month for the pill. If you do the other ones it can cost more

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 20

Mine is $15 with private insurance coverage.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With the ACA is is. Before, and potentially soon, you often have to pay out of pocket. Some brands cost hundreds a month.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I still have to pay out of pocket :( Blue Cross in TX won't totally cover the low hormone pill I'm on.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You'd think a hundred dollars/month would be cheaper than medicaid for a baby.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Companies can deny coverage of it for their employees if birth control is against their (the employER's) religion.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I work for one of these.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My deepest sympathies, friend.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Until ACA, I couldn't get it, and I needed it as a basic hormonal treatment due to a brain tumor.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My insurance covers mine 100%.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So much wrong here. Sildenafil isn't a blood thinner (it's also used for PAH). That number is from DoD, not Medicare/Medicaid, and is right

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 3

Huh? Don't you mean Mycoxafloppin?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I don't know how someone could repost this from the FP just yesterday and not even read the comments debunking the reply. Memes and

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

headlines are the junk food of politics.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Birth control can be beneficial for a lot more than just preventing pregnancy, but I don't see that getting covered

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 2

My periods were so bad I had to call out sick once a month due to cramps and vomiting. BC and now I just ruin underwear.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

True that. Helped with my mood disorder so much.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

BC has helped me with my mood, cramps, and bleeding for months at a time. I was 16 when it started bled for a year straight till my 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mom found out and said screw this you're going on BC. It was a God send and I was able to live normally and wasn't fatigued.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Birth control helped me when I was having a period for 7 months.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Covered by the DoD which is where this number is from

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Correct! But the sign's point is it's hypocritical to be ok with spending gov't $$ on viagra but not with spending it on BC and abortions

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She's pointing out how people are fine with gov't funds being used for viagra but protest it being used for abortions and birth control

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The number she is using is specifically what the DoD spends on viagra. She conveniently didn't include what they spend on BC

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tricare covers BC. And plan B. They do cover viagra to the tune of 6 pills per month. Source: I worked in a DoD pharmacy for 10 months

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you are missing her point. The sign isn't saying "why doesn't the DoD cover birth control".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The sign asks why those who argue gov't funds shouldn't be used for BC and abortion don't have a problem with it being used for viagra

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually, it is not a "blood thinner" (anti-coagulant), it is a vasodilator.

9 years ago | Likes 668 Dislikes 10

Yes, thank you. Pulmonary hypertension.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

So you're saying he should do some research as well?

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Yes. Yes, I am.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Pharmacy buddy :D

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: Rogaine is also a vasodilator

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Do your research"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why yes it is ;)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, they should have done their research, indeed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I may be misremembering this, but I thought the whole reason it was marketed as an ED drug was it wasn't effective for heart problems...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It works pretty well to reduce pulmonary hypertension and thus pulmonary edema at altitude.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's exactly the reason. The group at Pfizer thought they were going to lose their jobs. Turns out it had another lucrative application!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pulmonary vasodilator to be exact

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Mostly penile vasodilator. It is selective for cGMP phosphodiesterase 5, which is found predominantly in penile smooth muscle and the retina

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Not what it was developed for, but why it stayed on the market.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know a guy on the team at Pfizer that developed it for heart tissue. It didn't work. They thought for sure they were getting fired!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes i love when knowledgeable people give detailed and concise info. Keep up the good work.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I love you. I don't care who you are, I love you.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So I can get a rock hard retina?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Actually, it's not a "anti-coagulant" it's a much more complex system of chemical reaction which is more interesting. the correct term is1/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 16

He said that it was a vasodilator not an anti-coagulant. re-read the comment.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Dickbutt

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

This was very well-played indeed.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that was quite unexpected

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did not expect the dickbutt. Nor did I expected my phone to keep suggesting duckbill for dickbutt...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Vasodilator are my favourite dinosaur.

9 years ago | Likes 372 Dislikes 1

Vasodilator is my favorite Harry Potter spell

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was a type of vibrator

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks. Laughed harder than I should have. Brightened my day. Made me motivated to get off the toilet and go to work.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Got to love those huge red bastards!

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

And veiny

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And their modern descendents, cocks

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've heard they can spit creamy goo up to few meters if they get agitated. Nature is beautiful

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, don't get that stuff in your eyes.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also helps combat jet lag in hamsters.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Us physicists don't take kindly to your type... *spit chewing tobacco*

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

By all means correct me if I'm wrong but the two have a similar effect on the flow of blood don't they? (anti-coagulants and vasodilators)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Some overlapping effects, but substantially different mechanisms leading to vastly different side effects.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

1.anticoagulant- affect coag cascade -inhibit clot formation. Vasodilator cause blood vessel to relax. If by flow you mean preload- then no

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2. AC has no affect on preload and Vasodilators decrease it

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Medicare Part B does cover pumps for ED under durable medical equipment.

9 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 4

A guy I knew was in that industry. He made an absolute killing selling penis pumps that insurance paid for.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Did he pump up his numbers?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

You could say he experienced rapid growth, but the competition was stiff

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds like a hard field of sales, full of swollen ego's

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What would the CPT code be for that? Asking for a friend.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Semi-rigid non-inflatable 54400. Inflatable self-contained 54401. (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Inflatable mult-component 54405

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The most surprising part is that those pumps actually work and can be prescribed by a doctor...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

They are surgical pumps implanted into the penis with a pump in the scrotum. Not the "swedish penis enlarger" style pumps.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oh those! For some reason I had the most amusing doctor visit in my head.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://imgur.com/DFsZByh voila!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

TIL I did not need to know that this was real

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...but where do the balls go?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is a good question and I am not sure. I believe the pump goes in front the testicles but I would need a urologist to confirm.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't understand the hate that birth control has. The same people who will take medications for diseases are against birth control. Why?

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

If we make it universally available, it should be done through a separate system. But health insurance has been bastardized for a long time

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The issue I see is that BC is a regular cost, which is not really the purpose of insurance. e.g. auto insurance doesn't pay for oil change

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

That's totally not true. Healthy insurance is supposed to pay for yearly checkups, blood tests, flu shot, dentist cleaning 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

*I meant to say birth control is cheap. Yearly checkups probably are more expensive than birth control, although I need to double check.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2/2 all together is a dime compared to cost insurances pay for pregnancy checkups/birth/etc. Insurance WIN BIG on birth control, not lose.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The point of insurance is for unexpected situations. Otherwise why are we paying the middle man (insurance company)?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Then why does insurance pay for yearly checkups, gym memberships, new glassses every 2 years, contacts, prescriptions for chronic conditions

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If it's only for unexpected situations, why does it cover vaccines, regular cancer screenings, physicals, and other preventative medicine?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, health insurance shouldn't cover those things. Its not like insurance will reduce the cost of a known regular payment anyways

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The point of health insurance is to cover for health expenses... Sure, it also should cover unexpected costs, but what is truly expected or

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The insurance underwriters would tell you they would rather pay for those regular preventative things instead of unexpected expensive things

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not against BC personally, but I think the arguments against covering it break down into 2 very broad categories 1) It'a against God's (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

law (see the Catholic Church) & 2) It is not medically neccesary so they don't want to subsidize someone else's sex life.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But for some people, it IS medically necessary

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not disagreeing, I'm just saying that is what the arguments come down to

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it's just weird that they think taking pain killers and diabetic ISN'T against God's will. Just die, you know?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ack, ok trying (poorly) to explain someone else's philisophical belief in 140 character nuggets....I'm sure there are multiple (1/?)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

theological arguments, but a big one for the Catholic Church (and pre-1930 Protestants) is Genesis 38:9–10. Onan.."... spilled his (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On another theological argument is that the person of God's creation (life) is the contuation of life, so pain killers, diabetic meds, (1/?)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

etc work to continue and further life. Contraceptions by their nature prevent the continuation of life. So from that perspective, (2/3)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

purpose, not person, not sure what happened when I was typing that out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good sign, bad sign, what's it matter? Women should have the right to choose in a secular society.

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 16

Can't women have the right to birth control AND we have good signs?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The sign is arguing that choice should be subsidized. Which is a good idea, fiscally, but "right to choose" isn't the issue here.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Of course it is, they are trying to change the supreme Court to do just that. This just happens to be a current battlefield in this old war.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

they do and will. but they might have to pay for it.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Which is fine

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

yep. but i still get downvoted.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, the issue is contentious so what did your expect? Personally, I don't care either way but paying for it does help poor folk

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i dont care much either, but it seems like a state issue to me. since they foot the bill of unwanted babies. i think.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fine, IF AND ONLY IF men ALSO have the right to choose (whether or not they want to be a parent...this includes financially with the

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

understand that if they choose not to be involved, then they are giving up ALL parental rights)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Which sounds fine but isn't it the reverse that's the issue? Forcing the woman to have it because the man says to? I'm no lawyer but that's

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

... The issue, no?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Why would that be an issue if the statement is as follows "A person has the right to choose not to be a parent". He can't force her to have

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Women should only have the right to abort if men have the right to knock women up and then take off? Those don't seem equivalent.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

My scenario allows both sides to skip out on unwanted parental responsibilities. Currently only women can make that choice after pregnancy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes, and that's really the only level on which both sides are equivalent. Overall however, they are not nearly the same thing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

it sounds like your statement boils down to "Women and men are different biologically", which is obviously true. Just irrelevant

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And a company should be able to choose whether or not they cover/pay for it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

I disagree, but not necessary with this. Just idea that companies get to choose what they cover in general. Offer health insurance or don't.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I do think companies should provide some health benefits. But BC doesn't have anything to do with health. No woman has ever died (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

you might not know but BC is used to treat a bunch of medical issues. women have died of PCOS which BC treats.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm aware that it treats multiple issues.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

due to lack of birth control. I'm all for birth control and having access to it, but you should be paying for it yourself. (2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Meds, finger surgery etc all these are covered and no one ever died from a crooked finger. It's medical treatment prescribed by a doctor

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Pregnancy is dangerous and can and does kill women. Since when is the line for medical coverage: will directly kill you? Acne meds, roseacea

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There are issues with a woman cycle that the pill helps. It's not just to avoid pregnancy. Not being a doc or woman I can't really say more

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Can the US really be considered a secular Society?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

How is it not? The religious have input but don't run the joint.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

On paper. In practice, conservatives make a habit of pandering heavily to the religious majority for votes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Of course they do, they would run out of people if they could lie about how much they loved god... Still just numbers and votes

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Numbers and votes and bad policy that sets bad precedents that damage the separation of church and state.* FTFY

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Government was intended to be secular. Some founding principles have some Christian influence to it, but Constitution deems it secular.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's government is intended to be secular. Religious ideals aren't supposed to dictate government.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

They don't dictate, they just get a vote... This is exactly why voting is always important.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's not the way it works out in practice, unfortunately. Religion gets votes, so conservatives sign it into laws all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah but deciding when a life becomes a life isn't a religious question. It can be, that question is the whole reason for debate

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most likely agree that after the first trimester is too late. Why then? There's a heartbeat long before then, but it's still not really

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In human form yet. I just feel like if everyone could agree on that one question, it wouldn't be a debate. People ignore the fact that thats

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most people agree**

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0