This is what MAGA fans teach their kids. It matters.

Jun 22, 2020 6:57 PM

SisterMidnight

Views

114742

Likes

2235

Dislikes

233

When I share articles from the Washington Post or NY Times I often post the entire article because they are hidden behind paywalls. I do this knowing some people can’t or won’t pay for subscriptions and I think they should be informed. It’s like I took my copy of the paper and cut out that article for everyone to pass around.

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/we-dont-see-color-trump-rallygoers-explain-black-lives-matter-protests-to-their-children/2020/06/21/79ee890c-b40c-11ea-a510-55bf26485c93_story.html

I can’t say I’m shocked, but I am deeply saddened by the ignorance and lack of self awareness and empathy.

Someone just shared a twitter link with me that’s apropos, a grandmother shouting “I will teach my grandchildren to hate you all”. Here’s the link: https://mobile.twitter.com/notcapnamerica/status/1274915209094868992?s=20

This is really upsetting to read. The complete lack of understanding and knowledge... All while wearing those fucking shirts? Disgusting.

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 11

This is so, so depressing.

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 9

Thanks for the article. Great way to have a look at the”other side.” Ignorance is mutual and lack of information makes it worse.

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 8

Yeah, article in WSJ about how both sides only know caricatures of the other. “Idealogical segregation” gets no where

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It gets somewhere: Putin’s goal achieved.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 30

I read Fox News, as well as many other publications. Every Fox News article I’ve read makes him appear reasonable, a feat, I know. If that 1

6 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

2 is your only source of news you might think of him differently. They’ve admittedly done a good job of branding all other media as bias.

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

The say the same things they've always said "they're violent, criminals, and bad people" and also don't teach them about police brutality.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

It's a completely one sided conversation.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

https://apnews.com/afs:Content:2336745806 .... Not founded by Democrats

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Ho. Ly. Shit.

6 years ago | Likes 527 Dislikes 18

The level of indoctrination is fucking insane. :(

6 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 4

Isn't the "our nation was built on violence" the common answer from gun lovers?

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

But we need lots of guns, just in case. In case of what? That you have a tiny peener?

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

It seems like they just missing a key part of history that might help them to understand where we are today.

6 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 7

Also they never said what they now believe the confederate flag stands for now, not that would make it Ok for what it represented in past

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Almost no American history was taught during my years of schooling and I still have more of a grasp on it than they do...which is sad.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I learned a lot of history in high school, but the part of it that covered civil rights was pretty watered down and simplified. Booooo.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“i plan to tell him that the KKK was started by democrats” why don’t you tell them that the modern KKK endorses trump? ???

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 8

I want him to tell him that the democrats championed the civil rights act and fought segregation.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I know it's well beside the point... but that LGBT shirt makes me so fucking angry, well past what's probably a reasonable level of anger.

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

Saw someone in public wearing that shirt. Was angry too. Don't think people understand how cruel that can be. ?

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

I had to read the shirts 3 times. I couldn’t believe it. I felt the rage in my bones then I just felt sad..

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

“In our family, we use our brains”

6 years ago | Likes 1029 Dislikes 18

I wonder what they use them for.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The reporter’s face when he heard that one:

6 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 2

“George, who’s using the family brain cell at the moment?”

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yup. That's New Mexico for ya. I've met some oblivious dumb fucks out here. Remember that scene of "home-schooled freaks" from Mean Girls?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/scxdTXrfni0 this one. That's some people out here.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He said something along the lines of violence not being the way of the history in our country. He didn't pay attention to history class.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

... For what?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They dont know anything about history. Wait until you tell them about when Democrats and Republicans switched platforms

6 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 4

oh I tell this to racist grampa all the time and hea still in denial that if Lincoln was alive now he'd be a Dem

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Education reform cannot come sooner

6 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 1

Makes me laugh...A DEMOCRAT CREATED THE KKK. Okay. Who supports them now?

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Try mentioning the Southern Strategy.

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Hey can you direct me to a source? Been arguing this with a friend but can't find anything concrete about it...

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy Basically this. South used to be staunch Democrat- opposite now. Didn't change, parties did.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I thought immediatley when he said you can have your version of history, no you can't, you can have the right version of the wrong one.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

But how do we prove our version is right? Much less convince them of it?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's the tricky part of all history. The right version is never the same as the one written down. It takes a lot to determine the facts

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cause history is recorded by people, and people inherently are bias. Some say it intentionally (ie Roman history), others without knowing it

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Historic events are a matter of fact. History, generally, is a matter of perspective.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They didn't say anything about using them effectively or positively...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For what? Toilet paper?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There’s education and intelligence, many who are educated, aren’t intelligent

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

And many who aren't educated are also not intelligent

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some of the smartest people in history had zero education

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What the fuck is wrong with you people? It’s okay to have contrasting views. Step away from the mob for one second and think for yourselves.

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 8

What? So you feel hate& racism is a valid equivalent of folks protesting not being killed by police for their skin color?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you think every Trump voter supports racism and spews hate?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No & no.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, I’m sure the vast majority doesn’t consider themselves racist.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s not what I asked, but I think you know that. Here’s something you might enjoy. https://youtu.be/GLG9g7BcjKs

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’ll try again.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah sorry I never go to YouTube links from here. All too often it’s some propaganda bs... thx anyway !

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"(child) has to form their own opinion" is a great sentiment, but the environment they're raised in is going to affect that regardless.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Well of course it will. Like all of us. But they have the right view, expose their children to whats out their and let them form their own..

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

..opinion. like every parent, they are soing what they think is best for their child.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There*

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Decent folks (with some subconscious racism) so trained in "democrat = evil" ways that they can't see the monstrosity of their president.

6 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 13

Sad thing was the first guy seemed decent if misinformed maybe he will come around someday.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That is true, unfortunately so is the inverse of this is overwhelmingly on Imgur. People willfully believe any and all sourceless social

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Media post that reinforces Republicans Bad and apply Trump's corruption to the entire electorate without regard for circumstances or nuance.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is what that mentality leads to.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

The fight for equality...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Can you clarify what your talking about?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

With hard work we can get all the bars equally tall.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

This graph has been used by The New York Times, The Washington Post, Politico, the Atlantic, and Insider. But no one fact-checked it

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

until this unknown guy did? The claim strains credulity. Has ANYONE credible backed up his analysis?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That chart is the equivalent of Trump actually labeling Antifa a terrorist group. A quick google search can find more left-wing extremist

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Killings in a year than they have occurring in the entire timeframe. They simply don't count them because they aren't part of a

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

designated terrorist organization.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They left our the context where there was a major shift (read: flip-flop) in the values of democrats and republicans in the early 1900s

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

The flip is a complete lie. The South turned red because of the civil rights act signed by Lyndon B. Johnson.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

The KKK belongs to what WAS the democratic party, now represented by conservative/republicans and Lincoln's republicans would now be

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

The democratic party. 5 mins of research (or having paid attention in US History [even here in TX]) Will tell as much.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

They don't even need to learn history, just using common sense over the fact that the KKK flies the Confederate flag & supports Trump is

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Enough for anyone with half a brain to realize that the KKK isn't in any way affiliated with the Democratic party of today.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Remember when this was condemned by Rethuglicans as classist, identity politics? Member?

6 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 8

*sigh* Not all Pantera fans look like this. Trust me.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

no, did that actually happen?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

When I posted the image over a year ago...I was excoriated for unfair criticism. So....yes.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Are you being serious or is this /s?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

/s

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I'm being serious. You posted that pic on IMGUR and got in trouble?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

By “in trouble”, I am referring to the reactions of Trump supporters, and those adjacent. And very little support from allies.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Imgur has gone through some phases. For example, we used to have porn!

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

"The KKK was founded by Democrats." Yes, and since then the parties' roles have reversed, as well as their demographics.

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 8

People don't know the history of this. I've told people and linked to articles...they still don't believe it.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Even if Trump himself said all these things there would still be denial on some level.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's a PragerU ad being pushed that tries to argue the switch never happened. This notion is they're pushing is a concerted effort.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It also ignores that the parties were regional in the antebellum period. It took the Civil War to break that.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm shocked by the lack of empathy, I just dont understand where they're coming from

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 22

Generations of being taught hate and living a privileged life while feeling under-privileged, maybe? Idk. It’s very sad.

6 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 14

/s

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 25

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

Love your username

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

“If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket.” POTUS 36 LBJ

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jun 22, 2020 11:48 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Dixiecrats, who know vote R

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Too much "us and them" and assuming that the other hates what "you" love and stand for. One of the reasons we're not making any progress.

6 years ago | Likes 220 Dislikes 14

they cant win without us vs them, so they use state tv and try to split everything

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That disturbed me the most in the article, where a parent says that their kid has to pick a side.

6 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 2

Hm, but when you love and stand for, for example, LGBTIQ* rights, and then see these shirts and hear the usual talking points... How can you

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

not assume they hate what you love and stand for?

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

They are simply not smart. They cannot self correct. They evolve their justifications not their logic.

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 8

Yep. Lol simply is right

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What do they actually STAND for though? Some kind of mythical America that only existed on Happy Days?!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

"United we stand, divided we fall." How quickly we have forgotten. Now everything is 'us-vs-them'. I'm so tired of it.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

But ... they do each hate what the other loves. The fact that the left and right have inverse definitions of good and evil is what's 1/

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2/ ultimately going to ensure the downfall of America and the other western countries in its hegemony.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Conservative ideology is consumed by the concept opposition and the fear of "them". it's why they take to well to bigotry.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I swear this site is being overrun by Russian trolls. It’s the only explanation for the echo chamber Imgur has turned into. It’s nauseating.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

But it's all liberal posts and democratic pandering hating the other side, thinking they are the best shit ever, it's the other way around

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

What? Communists wanting to make America Communist? Never.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

"My side is the CORRECT viewpoint. Im so enlightened and if you dont agree you are dumb and racist"

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"but we'll let them make their own opinions." The most clueless and repugnant quote of the whole article. Sad if not infuriating.

6 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 19

No way. That’s not as bad as teaching racism.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you entirely missed my point.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m old. Things get confusing. Sorry.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kids don’t understand a lot and at that age learn from role modeling. like saying, we’re gonna let out kids learn from idealogical parodies

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"It's important they reach their own conclusions as to why the blacks are just whiny thugs who don't want to earn their fair share like me"

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Especially the one who said history is open for interpretation and home schools their kid.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

This is just heartbreaking. Such young children being indoctrinated.

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 10

Where in this article do you see that? More than one said they wanted to expose their children to all of this and let them decide

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How they feel. People are allowed to support trump and they allowed to disagree.with the protests. This my team your team mentality is..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

..just so ridiculous people dont even see their own hypocrisy. As the Dude says, "thats just your opinion man"

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it's ok when Muslims do it and cover their children with headrags?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No, it is not. How do you assume that? IMHO headscarves (and also circumcision or other religiously inspired shenanigans) should only be >

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

allowed for people of age. Now, my country has the law that you can choose your own religion at 14, however, I believe that at that age >

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you're still dependend on your parents and therefor vulnerable. That's why I would put the age of religious emancipation or whatever you >

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

want to call it, up to 18. In the USA I would also finally set a minimum age for marriage, because you guys have a severe child marriage >

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Muslim don’t cover children. Wearing a burka starts at puberty.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do your research, cause you look like an idiot. There are 2 year olds with headrags.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are these ppl living on the same planet as the rest of us? My god republicans need to stop defunding education, these people need to learn

6 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 17

But if they fund education better then they're gonna lose a whole lot of votes so that can't happen.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Works perfect for their rich donor class.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! We're creating a 3rd world country, and their kids will get left behind.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Your'e creating 3rd world world, it spreads outside America and we are all effected by it.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Read this article and you realize all it will take to reach some of these people is for Liberals to stop bringing Trump into the discussion

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Yeah, I've seen so many people who try to bring Trump into everything, and its really counterproductive. Its just 'orange man bad.'

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Because he is. He really, really is. It’s not even like a shitty attack or smear campaign, it’s just a fact backed up with lots of tweets.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I know. We all know. It doesn't need to be brought up 24/7. Not everything is his fault. Not everything involves him.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If he could just shut the fuck up and stop tweeting...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hard to not talk about the guy responsible for thousands of deaths.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

When it's a subject like police brutality, or systemic racism, it's reductive and ignorant of the long history of these issues.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We don't see color is such a bs thing to say. That's erasing all the hardships of an entire culture.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Aug 1, 2020 11:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Sep 21, 2020 7:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Giving financial aid based on race instead of social or economic standing is racist.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That isn't at all what I said. People can be equal but have different experiences. You can't deny the particular experience of being

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

2) black in America. Saying you don't see color is akin to saying I don't see you.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's also freeing yourself of any responsability.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

These people need someone to educate them. Not unkindly, literally teach them history (including recent history).

6 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 13

Not going to happen as a big part of the current Republican platform is trying to paint all higher education as "liberal propaganda".

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like those classes teaching you how to internet for older people, same thing. Why should schooling stop after college?

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

You cannot teach somebody who doesn't wish to learn. They need to be returned to the shadows their kind belongs in. 1/

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

When they want to grow and rejoin society, I will welcome them with patience and open arms.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They don't want to be told what they believe is wrong, and when they are they'll just deny it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The problem is they have been educated. They have all the answers they want. Everyone in that article said they don't understand protesters.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All of them across the street from protesters, not willing to ask them what was wrong. They don't want to be fixed. They want to be valid.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True although also not adequate public schooling on these topics now let alone most seem to be 50+ and no way schooling then talked about it

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

first you need someone to force them to listen. That's kind of the problem, anything that conflicts with Trump is a lie.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well as long as education keeps getting slashed, no one will ever learn anything.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But then they'd have to stop eschewing that Democrats founded the KKK because the intention would be lost in the meaning/truth.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

They would however get to learn the details about more recent forms of racism, such as the 1990s crime bill.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

not sure why you're bringing that up. The tough on crime move was also a democrat thing.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know it was. That's my point - the old Dixiecrats may have switched parties in the 70s, but there's still plenty of racist Dems.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The person before you seems to just want to highlight general racism. There was a whole lot of "I don't see colour" in that article.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tbh I'm okay with that. People need to drop the party line voting BS here anyways. Vote out the bad shit from all parties, introduce more ?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

would you say the interview with 2/3 people encompasses the entirety of all view points that don’t fit yours?Or is it likely WP cherry pick?

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I’d say it’s justified as our potus speaks to them not to middle of the road people or tries to unite the country.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right but there are middle of the road people that support him. Finding the most ridiculous view point then saying it represents all is 1/

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intellectually dishonest

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

potus defends racists so he’s further right than the middle of the road people. So it’s not dishonest to speak to his actual constituency.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Perhaps you don’t think T is racist. Would you say he is or that he defends them? Like do you think his words or actions are racist?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All journalism is about picking a narrative.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Always and now a days hard to take any of the big guys seriously. Journalism is increasingly black and white when reality is much more grey.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There has never been objective reporting. If the meteorologist says the weather will be good he has picked a narrative.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not the best example but point taken. People just aren’t very good at filtering out bs is basically what I’m getting at

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the best example!!!!1

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But politiclal parties swapped sides didn't they? Dems of old aren't the same as Dems now? I'm a brit, I don't really know the history

6 years ago | Likes 441 Dislikes 19

Not really. Supposedly they switched after the 1964 civil rights act, but dixie stayed blue for another decade after that. The blue 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 20

and red states didn't start to mirror the old lines until 1992. Realy what happened is the prominence of the civil rights movement waned 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

once the act was passed, and the parties moved on to wedge issues. Ultimately the freesoiler and evangelical 2/3

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

factions of the republican party rose to prominence over the Rockefeller republicans. All these factions were supportive of the civil 3/4

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

rights movement, but the shift of democrats from agrarian to industrialist ideals shifted the balance of power with the republican party 3/3

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

And the real point is what they work towards TODAY. Using political party affiliation as a weapon and a generality is making things worse.

6 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 4

You just did exactly that what you are accusing them of.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 24

How? They didnt mention either

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think they were trying to say the "they" in the first sentence was a generalization of another party as said in second sentence.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Which leads me to believe they didn't understand the context of the comment and misinterpreted the first sentence.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That the party of civil rights & Obama are of the Klan, while the party fighting to preserve confederate flags/statues isn’t, is laughable.

6 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 3

That Democrats were slavers and klansmen is true... but then 150 years happened. Progressivism and two Roosevelts scrambles the parties (1)

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Then the Civil Rights Act and Immigration Acts of 1965 and stagflation of the 70’s drove rural whites away from the DNC forever. (3).

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

*Drove "racist rural whites" and the "rural white voting bloc" away forever. Plenty of good white folks in the country.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

If there are, they aren't voting.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

google "nixon southern strategy". JFK & LBJ backed civil rights and alienated old-school D segregationists.

6 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 2

A million likes, yes.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And there are people claiming the Southern strategy isn’t real.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YES. This is why when Trump tries align himself with Lincoln, it’s bullshit. Trust me, if Lincoln we’re alive today, he’d be a Democrat.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not really. People say they did, and make the claims, but in reality, it's still the same groups fighting for the same-ish things

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In many ways (including this one), yes.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically yes, after the civil rights act

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Though you did start to see a shift around FDR's elections, its the Civil Rights that fully cemented the switchover.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yes. Lincoln was a progressive Republican, an extreme within his party. And even he didn’t want to free the slaves. The tide changed 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With Kennedy, I believe. Both presidents were assassinated. Both VP’s were named Johnson. 1 VP continued the forward momentum (Kennedy’s).

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The original KKK were Democrat's in name. They opposed Republican ideology but weren't abolitionist-mineded, kind of like there are black or

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

gay Republicans in today's political environment. When the party solidified around equality to all blacks the Dixiecrats went Republican.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Democrats still have to own 1900's bigots being part of the founding of their party. But there are no KKK members voting for union rights or

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Public Health Care or Pandemic prevention measures today.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Republicans used to be the "progressive" party but that started shifting in the early 1900s through mid-century

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only difference between them is that one is controlled by slightly less scary corporate interest groups

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I personally don’t like having an affiliation to a party my ideals may overlap or be case by case decision

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're correct, it just shifted where conservatives are now republican. The party of Lincoln were progressives.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Basically. More Rs (+D POTUS) favored the CRA than Ds, but if you break it down, it was North vs. South. Then allegiances changed to suit.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was the inflection point of Nixon's Southern Strategy, which created Reagan them Gingrich then Trump.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of my favorites is “You can’t keep claiming to be the party of Lincoln & cling to the Confederate flag at the same time”

6 years ago | Likes 271 Dislikes 1

How to favorite a comment

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yoink

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

If you'll notice, in a world where slavery is federally legal and states wanted the ability to get their escaped ones back from wherever

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

they ran to, a certain group of people were for big federal government (Democrats) but with slavery outlawed and the federal government

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

instating labor laws, suddenly a certain group of people want small government (Republicans). It's the same people. You have to look at what

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

the goals were and remember that the US is a democracy only in that that title serves the Oligarchs who have shaped policy for hundreds of

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

years. Race was and remains a convenient excuse to get ignorant people to support oppression and subjugation.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There used to be conservative dems and liberal dems, and also conservative repub and liberal repub. Parties merged and polarized in time.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, they did. There was a flip from D (old Democrats) to d (new Democrats) same with the Republican party. People like to use the general

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Term Democrat to explain it without really knowing the difference between the two.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” included anti-civil-rights policy in order to woo racist Democrats to the Republican Party

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And YES the parties switched COMPLETELY in the 60’s. The Southern racist democrats that started the KKK are the Republicans of today

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Yes, LBJ signed civil rights laws which drove out the southern Dems. In response the republicans adopted the "southern strategy".

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For anyone who doubts the truth of this fact, in 2005 the GOP formally apologized for adopting it. They wanted to court "negrophobes".

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ancient Dems have the same ideology as modern day Republicans.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Not the same. The old Dixiecrats were not pro-corporate and not pro 1%.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everybody belongs to many groups (man, white, Democrat, southerner, blue collar, etc). The KKK founders belonged to many, as well. 1/

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Republicans are just cherry-picking one of them because they're desperate. And racist.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Basically. Yes, those we'd call Dems back then would typically be Rep today.

6 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 9

So since they are trying to paint the Democrats as the racists, aren’t they actually admitting Republicans are the racists now? Hmmm

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Sorta. People are taught party history as if it is black & white, which is annoyingly awful...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Implicitly, but they gloss over the Democratic party schism and pretend the hardcore racist bloc didn't join their party in the 60's/70’s

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Sort of, the southern Democrats (Dixiecrats) who fought against Martin Luther king left the D’s and by Reagan joined the R’s. Small Gov R’s

6 years ago | Likes 171 Dislikes 4

welcomed them in along with evangelicals who are all about big gov when it comes to vaginas. It’s sort of sad US politics aren’t ideological

6 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 2

It’s called “the southern strategy” source wiki: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

but more about marriages of convenience.

6 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

Sounds a bit like early Europe. That explains a lot.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

v

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Add to that an ignorant population where 40% don’t vote, no nothing of geopolitics & history, love sound bites, think wealthy people are

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How early are we talking? I'd like to look at that part of history to see what's coming next.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0