To be fair, Nestle is technically a person

Apr 9, 2018 12:41 PM

Nestle believes that water is not a human right. He believes he must bottle every drop of fresh water on the planet so he can sell it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nestle doing the same in California, on expired permits no less. Courts ruled in their favor. GG

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 6

Probably got paid off in chocolate milk mix

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

it's more-accurate to say the city partners with an important employer who makes it possible for thousands of citizens to pay taxes.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Water? Like out of the toilet?

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 0

BRAWNDO ITS GOT WHAT PLANTS CRAVE

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

it's got electrolytes

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

its got electrolytes

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Michigan. Can confirm. Assholes. Assholes everywhere, and mostly in leadership positions.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

as with every other state in our country, just seems more so in Michigan than anywhere else.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Seems"? It is more so. Credit goes to term limits.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

oh, are term limits still in effect? i wouldn't be surprised if that got removed at this point.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but you see : money

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuck Nestle. I was an external product manager and extruder for their packaging division. They treated their hard workers like shit

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Random layoffs because a particular quota wasn’t met by upper management was the norm...as long as execs made that bling it was peachy.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

For fucks sake America

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuck Nestle and their shitty chocolate.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

LOL Michigan. What a shit hole.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The Flint thing aside, why the hell is Nestle getting water for free? If they're selling it, shouldn't they pay for it?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Perfect post for Facebook, rich with no context or substantiated quotes.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You got a source for this?

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 12

That articles says nothing about what is in the post., it talks about how they are allowed to pump more water from the well they already use

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

200 bucks a year to pull 500k gallons of fresh water *per day*

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Election time will be soon. Vote them out

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

How many times do you have to keep voting Republican before you realize they're just ass fucking you unless you're a giant corporation?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Harry Truman: "If you want to live like a republican, vote democratic."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because I see what the democrats do in california, i can never vote for a democrat because of that fucked up state (fuck republicans too)

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Because one day, if I work really hard, I could be super rich, and then the laws would apply to me too.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Was unaware that Flint is full of Republicans.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You're a very special person, aren't you? There are programs for people like you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Are they camps? Campouts are fun!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I still don't understand how companies are allowed to bottle public water and sell it without paying anything

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They don't

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nestle owns their own well. Not public water.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Digging a hole to access underground water doesn't (or shouldn't) mean you now own that water. It's a public resource.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In a state literally soaking with water, it's a near infinite resource. They paid everything they should have and got proper permits.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's exactly how it works with mining on public lands. You lease or buy the land, pay for any permits, and then you own what you dig up.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What if i told you....that you can buy a reusable bottle and fill it with tap water instead of buying bottled tap water.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

BLASPHEMY!!!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What if i told you that the Flint tap water is poison and killing people. Thats why they need bottled water in the first place.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 16

What if i told you flint has had safe drinking water since it was fixed 2 years ago. That's actually why the bottles stopped

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 10

They said to continue with drinking bottled water till the lead pipes have been replaced, in 2020. They also changed the acceptable

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

standards for the levels in their drinking water to cover their own asses.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

Are there federally mandated minimums for public drinking water?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What the other guy said. Understand the folks who said this is safe now also added the 2020 caveat after their lawyers laughed at the claim

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Rick Snyder is garbage. He'll never see justice for poisoning an entire city because he also crippled unions in MI, a coup for corporations.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What about the leadership of FLINT MICHIGAN?? what about that garbage? Dems since the 90's at least..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The leadership of Flint at that time was the emergency manager appointed by the Republican govenor.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and that means the Democrats the residents of Flint weren't the ones who fucked up.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the Flint city council approved the change of water supply by a 7-1 FOR vote.. the City of Flint failed the people of Flint.. The DEMOCRATS

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This feels like it might be an unpopular opinion, but... I feel like a lot of this hubbub is over nothing. Yes, water is a basic human (1)

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

right and everyone should have access to it. It is part of the responsibility of our government to use its people's tax dollars to create(2)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

a source of safe water for its population. Beyond that, however, corporations should have every right to monetize their infrastructure (3)

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

, such as bottled water. It's a cost to transport, a cost in materials, a startup cost in building a factory or production line, etc. (4)

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Essentially, what I'm saying is that while water is a basic human right, it's not the responsibility of corporations to provide that. (5/5)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

You’re the kind of person Devo was making fun of

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but they also shouldn't hinder it, which is what Nestle is doing.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Snyder is garbage

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian this stuff baffles me. How are your politicians this heartless?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

America ...where money is God.. ..I mean freedom.. EH

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It’s not our politicians. It’s our Republicans. They don’t even care about policy any more. It’s all about sticking it to the liberals.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Sorta like any TV show with hooting apes throwing a computer to the ground because they don’t understand how technology works.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They are getting the water from Lake Superior. This is fluff..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well there's a chance that the officials who've been dealing with this for years know more about the issue than people on social media.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

So why haven't they fixed it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it isn't just "it". For example, Flint water issue is mostly not with public pipes. It's with pipes inside people's own plumbing.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So if you live in a house with lead pipes underground, it's not a "heartless politician" that's causing the logistics issue.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That makes their behavior even worse.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The egos found on social media never cease to astound me. "These experts disagree." "Well then they must secretly know how right I am!"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Oh now it’s experts. Not “officials,” which is what you initially said. Experts agree that Flint officials fucked up by poisoning the town.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But hey, thanks austerity measures. Another victory for fiscal conservatism.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

we pay as much for a case of 24 bottles as this corporation does for millions of gallons. not considered stealing since it's "groundwater"

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Boycott Nestle.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

and just not use water for anything? come on think realistically.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

"realistically". I lived half my life without bottled water.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People have been boycotting nestle for one thing or another since the 70's, haven't made that much of a difference.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because of a misleading internet picture?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check out what they've been up to in Africa.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

damn :(

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nestle is draining one of our country's greatest assets

8 years ago | Likes 566 Dislikes 17

Just take what you need from Canada

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yo fuck Nestle for real. What a pile of bricks their CEO is.

8 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 2

Er have you seen what farming is doing to the Ogallala aquifer?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Idk doesn't the US have a death penalty? Not a big fan but in this case..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

our PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*owning the worlds largest share of

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yo I was just watching idiocracy and this just reminds me of it

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

From the toilet

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i sang your comment to the tune of their "nestle makes the very best!" jingle

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But yet, people keep buying their water

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Nestle owns a lot more than just bottled water. Just look at this old image:

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Wow, that’s insane. I had no idea. I try to just do my own filtered water and bring a reusable container with me wherever I go

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See this is why cyberpunk failed. It promised us our corporate overlords would have cool names like Renraku or Saeder-Krupp or ARES. Instead

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they're named Nestle and Johnson & Johnson.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Simple, stop buying bottled water and instead invest in a reusable bottle. I invested in one since 2016. Haven't bought a case a since.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

I BET YOU'RE JUST WITH BIG REUSABLE BOTTLE TRYING YOU TRICK US.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People buy bottled so they don't use tap water

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Well that's the problem. There is demand from the people for bottled water. If there is a strong demand, companies will keep on pumping.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The problem is not demand, the problem is regulation and law.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Really, that's a distinction for your political affiliation. Should we regulate it, or should you buy a water filter and stop supporting 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

which is?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The Great Lakes

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Water. He's talking about water. How the hell did you miss that?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Water? That's an American thing now? Damn, you guys move quick

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 20

Your strawmaning him mate. Cut it out

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Nestle is a Swiss company actually.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You're a fucking idiot.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well not exclusively, no, but IIRC Americans heavily rely on water for drinking, washing, and all sorts of other reasons.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, only Americans are effected by corporate greed. If only we could embrace the practices of the rest of the civilized world.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 3

You know, like Chinese sweat shops or Russian labor camps to name a few.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Technically you have embraced those things, since alot of major retailers still use out of country child labour for manufacturing. \O/

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

And once again, how again is this exclusive to America? The point I’m making is you will find this in all corners of the globe.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

patent pending

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you not drink water where your from . I'm confused ???

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No just moonshine.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Saying "Our country's precious fresh water resources a great asset" does not imply that another country doesn't value their water.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Corporatism is a euphemism for fascism

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 29

No. Fascism is a collectivist movement with an all powerful government conscripting the people into a singular military goal

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

It's more similar to feudalism. Corporations don't really discriminate, they just want slave workers stuck in their jobs and consumerism.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, fascism hates you with passion. Corporatism is just really sorry they have to let you die but they have to make a profit, you know?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

do you even understand what those words mean, or are your just reading from antifa brochures?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Flint water has been under the lead limit for two years and you can pump water on your land for free in most states. This is nonsense.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 11

The sources are fine. Its the pipes leading to houses the lead is coming from.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nope the EPA measures at the faucet. It includes those pipes and thus is representative of what people are actually drinking.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

People in flint cant start digging wells in the backyard of their rental slum? Has anyone ever been to inner city flint?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Or perhaps I was referring to the second part where they were complaining Nestle was getting water for "free"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yep but residents told NOT to drink/use tap water until 2020 (based on 'we could get sued if we said otherwise legal advice)

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Source?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The announcement back in 2017 that said it was under also included the warning/advice... and the March 20th court ruling.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

give me a link I mean.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Right, but individual residents still have lead tainted pipes. Would you drink out of a Flint tap?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Nope, EPA measures are done from the faucet and thus include the residents pipes.

8 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 2

Depends on how thirsty I was

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’re being downvoted even though you’re right.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Except he isn't. EPA testing (which is what found it to be safe) is done at the faucet and thus includes those residential pipes.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Except he is. The residents of the city are being advised to drink bottled water. Still.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Source? And who is advising them? Because it sure as hell isn't the EPA who's job this actually is.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Michigan is stopping the free bottled water for Flint because Flint's water has pass Federal limits for two straight years now.

8 years ago | Likes 507 Dislikes 38

Except residents are still advised to drink bottle water, because the pipes are fucked. Nice red herring.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

The lead in the home owners pipes falls on the homeowners to replace. Lead was used in pluming till it was banned in 1986

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No it doesn't, which is why there are free replacement programmes. The lead only became a problem because it was damaged by the water change

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then why are people whining about it? If there are free replacement programs, why are they whining?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Because until they are replaced they can't drink the water, you dumb fuck.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ssssh! Political shitposting isn't about facts.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 10

What are the federal limits and how far does Flint go to provide better water if they've been passing limits for a few years?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hey shut it we are busy hating on corporations. Facts have no power here.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How dare you bring facts to his rant!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The water sources are fine, its after it goes through corroded pipes and comes out houses faucets with lead and salt in it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Very true! I don't know anything about the Nestle part though.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Came to post this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jul 26, 2018 4:15 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"...buuuut you're gonna power through it..."

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Usually objective facts should be believed. You should give it a try

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 3

Flint resident here. There is still shady shit happening. Only some of the water is passing tests. And some of it is just for lead and not

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

other substances. My water tests lead free but if I leave it out to evaporate there are some weird buildups being left behind. Some of

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

the other neighborhoods are still having brown water coming out of the pipes. Not enough people have had pipes fixed yet and they

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

take away the free water even though half the city still has shit for water

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I'm sure the asshats in their fancy cars at town hall had their buildings taken care of and act like its fine now

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

All tap water has weird residue. That's why people get softeners and use filters. Its still safe to drink. Just get a Brita filter

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

This solution is balls. Fuck you, you drink it. Clean water is a basic human right.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

I know that, in my home town I drank tap water and its left residue sure. But the stuff here is real sketchy looking.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.... nestle still shouldn't have access to free water, though. They should pay for it, same as anyone else.

8 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 10

They are paying for it, same as everyone else. When you have your own well, you don't pay by the gallon.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The problem is a corporation will draw more water than a resident ever will. So it's different.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The comparison you should be making is not to residential usage, but agricultural. Agricultural users often measure water usage in acre-feet

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed. good point. That being said, agricultural use of water is a huge suck. Poor management can lead to disaster (ex. The Dust Bowl)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are paying for it at the same rate as everyone else with land, $0/gal. You don't have to pay to pump groundwater on land that you own.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

The government is givingbtgem free groundwater with my tax money!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Which they do ($200). "This" seems to be a rational report https://www.pri.org/stories/2018-02-04/tiny-michigan-town-water-fight-nestle .

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The water supply is technically safe, but residents are still discouraged from drinking tap water because lead plumbing is still prominent.

8 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

Someone e who actually knows their shit here.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

A little. I did some research before I commented

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well thats due to homes being plumed with lead pipes, which falls on them to replace.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That sounds simple and affordable.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On a 1500 sqft house it could be done for as little as 4-6000

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Average monthly take home in Flint is around 2K.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorry, I said 2k, but it's actually closer to $1500 according to census data.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait, federal limits permit lead in plumbing?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Less than 15 parts per billion. The water in my town comes in at 5ppb.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not exactly, but the iron plumbing coroded over time, allowing significant build up of lead from the water supply.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Pipes weren't maintained. Lead is in water supply. What are the federal limits to lead contamination?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

15 ppb, I think?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

May I just add that it was pH issue which lead to greater corrosion of the bad piping. Which is the big argument... is it the gov 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ernments fault that their pipes are made of lead and are old? Or the consumers fault for not changing their homes pipes? 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Okay, I can't find it anywhere. What's Flint?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Seriously???

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Unbeknownst to, it seems many Americans, there is a world outside of the USA. Said world does not have explicit knowledge of USA's geography

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or maybe you assumed that only educated Americans use Imgur. Sorry to say, this website is an internationally accessible service.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With the probable exception of some countries, including China and North Korea.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A city in Michigan.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thanks!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Flint made their bed yet everything is supposed to stop to fix the problem if you don’t pay the water bill how can you get water

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 18

If you're Nestle, skip straight to step 2: profit.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The politicians made rhe bed. The people are paying the price.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Democracy is the fix for this, don’t keep bad politicians in that ruined it change them out, If the new guys don’t work vote them out,Simple

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Would you pay a fucking water bill that literally poisened your kids?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The reason they’re even using tainted water is because they didn’t pay their water bill for months and were cut off, what options were left

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If I’m factually incorrect please correct me otherwise my point stands

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 1456 Dislikes 17

It literally is a human right tho

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

His name is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, and he deserves to be locked up in some desert shack to die of thirst.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

So...he should be charged for the water then, cause it shouldn't be free according to him

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Weird is not being shot a human right? Maybe he should find out...

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Wow he have a generic punchable villain face ...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He reminds me more of the villain from Tank Girl.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That’s got to be a joke right? Water isn’t a human right? I don’t think even toddlers would agree with that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wasn't Nestles almond business a big contributor to why California has droughts?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He kind of has a point. Free clean water is not a basic right like free speech. Just like free food isn't a basic right.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 54

You're right, but mind you the increased numbers of people that just get shit handed to them. Unpopular puffin

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

Im going die slowly of dehydration but I thank the stars for my right to talk smack throughout the whole ordeal.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

So it's fine to let people starve if they've got no money, ok gotcha /s

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Not what he said. The implication here is NOTHING is free. Everything is just there because someone worked for it to be there.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

THESE CUSTOMERS PAID MONEY FOR YEARS,were lied to,and many children may be permanently brain damaged.Thousands robbed of health,even lives.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I mean it's a gray area but you have a point, there has to be a line *sonewhere* but I don't think this is where it should be drawn.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Some people are so stupid they should be choked for spreading their mindless bullshit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except it is a right under the U.N. gen. comment no 15 tow which the U.S. has agreed to abide, see:

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d11.html - as it has both legal and humanitarian basis as a human right.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How is water not a human right lol let's stop him from having access to water and let him see what happens to your body

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Commodities are not human rights.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a difference between water and clean water.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Ask people in Africa if it’s a human right, or just a human need. Two very different things.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

But if it is a need for survival it should be a right. And water is actually a human right under the UN.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While you aren't wrong a human need should be viewed as being a right when partaking in the productive aspect of society, and there's the

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

other aspect that if you want to privatize water sources you have to legalize storing rain water, which decimates the water sources.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Do not, my friends, become addicted to water. It will take hold of you and you will resent its absence!"

8 years ago | Likes 287 Dislikes 0

Dihydrogen monoxide is pernicious stuff.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

100% of people who drink water die!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

To be fair 100% of people who don't drink water die too.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

100% of people die

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% if some religions are to be believed

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not yet

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This quote is out of context. He's still a dick.

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 6

Thanks

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's actually a full-blown misquote, but I don't disagree with your assessment.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

“The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right.”

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Tbf, he’s still saying that water isn’t a public right

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

As I said, not arguing the meaning, but he never said the words being quoted.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Air is not a human right, it should be privatized", "Life is not a human right it should be privatized", etc... It's deeply flawed

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

/a/ACiWH Did someone say air should be privatized?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Bless you I was really hoping for that picture

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it isn't. just watched the interview and he said that basically exactly, just with different phrasing

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I can’t imagine any context where that statement would be considered acceptable.

8 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 5

He was stating that people over use water when there in scarcity and that it needs to be controlled. But they also bottled during drought so

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iGj4GpAbTM once more.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...aaand "this video is blocked in your country for bullshit reasons"... thankfully, YouTube proxies are a thing. Thanks for the link!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jul 5, 2020 3:05 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

iirc it was that water is not a natural right with the exception of drinking water/shower/laundry. Otherwise should be treated as a product.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You do not remember correctly

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you remember it so badly watch it again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iGj4GpAbTM

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Oof.. hard to trust anything from that channel.. chemtrails and GMO conspiracy theories..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0