Fantasy line went down, you go hungry now.

Oct 13, 2020 11:06 AM

Lanhdanan

Views

92453

Likes

3414

Dislikes

232

"just let people have food" How about you spend all year growing some nice vegetables and then give them away for free?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Huh?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Human hunger isn’t real either. Think about it, without people, people wouldn’t be hungry /s

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

This is true. That's why I know that I, at least, will never have to go hungry.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The economy is real, the stock market is not the economy. Those on the right and left need to stop conflating the two.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Executives just need to stop lying about the latter to boost the former.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My buddy calls it the rich people’s feelings meter. That’s about as near to real as it gets.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

All praise the line! The line demands a sacrifice!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Today i bring you: 25 goats, oh line!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't mean it's not real. I had no idea there were economic flat earthers.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

The line is an indicator of how good things are. You’re mixing up cause and effect. That’s like getting mad at the doctor for your diagnosis

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Economics!

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Saying the economy isn't real is like saying math isn't real, we just made it up.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well that's kinda true. But it's like saying "math is made up, just engineer a better energy source without it."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Douglas Adams; basically the opening line of Hitchhiker's Guide discussing how people on Earth are sad & try to move green paper to be happy

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you have to save on food, rent is the problem. Those prices are through the roof and contribute to the disparity between rich and poor.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You try making something you want to sell that everybody wants... but nobody wants to pay for. See how well that works out for you.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

The Moneymakers are making money. No worries

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

We need the line! How else do we know if things are good?! /s

5 years ago | Likes 309 Dislikes 7

When did /s start to mean sarcasm?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

since forever, man 's

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

GREEN LINE GO UP! GREEN LINE GO UUUUUUUUUPPPPPPPP!!!

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm reminded of Yossarian moving the Bomb Line in the book Catch-22. The recent adaptation was actually really good - find it on Hulu/Prime.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about this... things are always bad until they are good

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have mocked our Economy. And now the Economy has cast its vengeance upon us all!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

She did it. She solved everything

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 7

Just don't be the way that you are. Easy!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

And this is why basic economic literacy is important. The economy isn't a "magic line". Its the allocation of supply to meet demand.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If you do not understand this, you're a fucking moron. Maybe invest in a new degree. Or even a basic google search.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The girl who thinks the only reason famine exists is made up fantasy lines is telling people to grow up?

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

No, the economy is real, it measures how much we output.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

I think you lose credibility once you use the phrase 'born... against my will'. Can anyone point out a human who wilfully chose existence?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All of us are willfully choosing existence for the moment. We could quit if we wanted to. I know I intend to when it becomes inconvenient.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a fine line. I don't like encouraging suicide, so tried to specifically speak to no ability to choose birth vs. not.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nonetheless if my birth was a mistake, it's nice to know I can fix it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

your birth wasn't a mistake. you're here for reasons and yeah, your life can always be fixed. hope you're having a beautiful day :))

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If she asked to be born, I'm sure her parents would have said "No."

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

Damn Ruth.. lol

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

but how will rich people buy more things they don't need

5 years ago | Likes 296 Dislikes 11

I'm sorry but this comment demonstrates how utterly illiterate people are on economics. If the rich bought stuff in proportion to how 1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Much money they have then working people producing those goods and services would get more in compensation. The rich hoard money. It's 2/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That instinct that makes them capitalists in the first place. That hoarding instinct drives wages down by design *and* as a side effect. 3/3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're not really buying useless shit, they're hoarding it offshore, draining the economy. But when line down its our job to fix it.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Many offshore accounts are actually worth fk all. Netflix laundromat. Money isnt real. Its a fiictional item growm to enslave

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't just buy material goods with that money. You could never spend it all. The only thing you need that much money to buy is power.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Orrrrr save it in trust funds and property for posterity? Just a thought that isn't evil...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, "pizzas for meetings". This whole thing stinks of trying to make him look like "just one of us" and its gross.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Item ten. He bought the Washington Post. A news outlet is now his, personally. This is exactly what I mean.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's a system we created. A poor man's economy is based on making sure inflation doesn't sky rocket so our literal dollars hold value.

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 10

If you gave most Americans a 100% pay boost and it caused 99% inflation, most of us would be better off.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I got one extra dollar and something costs 99 cents I'd save a penny....

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you owe $50k on a house, and it suddenly dropped to $25k with the same number of payments, you'd save a whole bunch of pennies.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably 7 nickles if we're being honest with each other

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is different from the stock market economy. Which is a measurement on the health of a company or group of companies. Which in turn run

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Our country.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

But has zero ethical value

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stopping inflation is for the Rich. Think of who owns all of the money. The insanely rich, and banks.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Inflation is bad for institutions that own debt

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The reason this is wrong is inflation hurts buying power of currency and savings. The rich have assets the fluctuate with inflation.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You have a 100$ and after inflation it has the buying power of 50$ rich man has a factory worth 500k after same inflation it's worth 1mil.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yep.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was talking on a smaller scale for things like groceries

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the best way to deal with it is to get rich

5 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 6

That’s right, do get rich you poor people. Says me who lives with his parents

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*be born rich

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just point that fucker out and consider him got.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Big time got.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What was that quote about all americans being temporarily embarrassed millionaires?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just buy more money, folks!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ohhhhhhhh. I’m down

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

....but Mr. Scorpio...you did think of that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Get Rich or Die Tryin'" was a profound album title...

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Kids today will never understand...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, the “economy” started with barter/trade systems and is a direct product of human society. The modern macroeconomy is more nebulous

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Money is, when broken down all the way, a universal IOU for goods/services. A middlehand when trading two items.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fiat money as currency, totally. Gold, pelts, etc were used as money but have an intrinsic value.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Gold is only valueable because people like shiny things. As soon as you try to eat it you see how worthless it is

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Value is also due to rarity the supply and demand shtick. If people want it and it's rare it value is greater than that of more common items

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gold? It's a good electrical conductor, but it's a poor material to make stuff from.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What the heck are you talking about? Gold is shiny and rare and very easy to make beautiful things from. This is why it holds an intrinsic

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Value and why representative currencies were backed by it (eg the US gold standard).

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Like, some tribes lived closer to deposits of rocks used for spear and arrow points, and later controlled copper and iron ore deposits.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And would specialize in processing these and trading for other materials that weren’t available locally.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

But but... Globalism!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

¿Que?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sometimes the tribes weren't far away, but, really far away.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that doesn't encompass my belief that the economy is just a stupid concept and I should be rich for no reason!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What an incredibly dumb way to look at the economy. “economy isn’t even real” what? It’s a measure of business success which employ people 1

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 10

Just because someone doesn’t understand something doesn’t make it “not real.” It’s a “fantasy line?” This is why education is important

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

Username checks out

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You see she read a post from Becky and she is smart about those things and stuff and she totally likes kittens so she know more than you.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Its profit over people, it should be the other way around. The economy happens regardless how we perceive it. Goods will always be exchanged

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

But profit is a measure of how well you serve your fellow man.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

According to Adam Smith, in competitive markets, pursuing self-interest leads to an increase in well-being for everyone.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Unfortunatly that is flat out wrong

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

How so? Innovation and investment into looms lead to cheaper clothes for all. That lead to more disposable income for everyone. That fueled

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Competition has nosedived. Everything in the most valuable sectors are too complex for small guys. ie technology; imagine competing w/ FANG.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Correct. Oligopolies are bad for competitive markets. We need to find ways to reduce barriers to entry and promote competition.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet..

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“Just let people have food” - Start a farm and give away your harvests. If it’s as easy as you say?

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 25

Easy for govt with as much resources as US. if there are trillions for war and corp bailouts then a few Billions for foodstamps should be ok

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’ll be paying thousands a month in loans for the land, fuel, seed, and equipment. Thats before your life costs.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 13

Who’s paying you to do it? Where do you get your money from so you can survive?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 10

The point is that the 1% got it easy, but when they tip the apple cart over its the rest of us that starve. You're not that slow, right?

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 12

I’m not following your metaphor?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’re talking about working within the system. She’s talking about abolishing the system. 2 very different things.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 10

She's talking about a free lunch.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’re looking at a tree, I’m looking at the Forrest.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How? All the trees are in the way...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you suggest we abolish the system? Who is willing to grow/raise, prepare and provide that food without compensation?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Oh, I know well enough that I can’t come up with an answer by myself off the top of my head in 140 characters or less.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

in case of doubt, you could just link to sth (if you have/find it...)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, I believe Lenin tried something similar. That worked out SOOOO well.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ah, something was tried once and failed so nothing should ever be tried again. Flawless logic ;)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Education, sir. USSR Communism was the ONLY example of socialism ever. It failed for many reasons. EU/Canadian style civil services is close

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who said anything about communism or socialism?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To optimal as anything. True socialism is economic socialism and is extreme and can never work; if you don’t get this you have not learned

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Food still doesn't just magically grow in the quantities we need. It takes a shitload of work to make farming happen enough to support us

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Right now, about 30 to 40% of our food supply is wasted, if we reworked our system in a way that prioritized feeding people over capital

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Gain, that would help a lot

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

How? Do you have a specific proposal? A clear plan? You're talking about abolishing the system, okay. But everyone from Robespierre 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

According to the USDA, that waste is caused by spoilage, damage, and people buying more than they individually eat... not pursuit of profit

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 1781 Dislikes 22

ngl, we don't love the same things

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 2

Privatize the gains, socialize the losses. Thats been the plutocracy MO in America for about 70 years.

5 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 2

No, no no, that sort of game is played without nationality. Those fuckers move their HQ wherever they gain the most profit. Least taxes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They play that game on a global scale and every country that can be exploited, is affected.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A true democracy also has an economic democracy where you cannot accumulate too much wealth

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's because shit trickles down, not up

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When the stock market goes up I get closer to retirement faster.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

Also if you want food get chickens and a garden that's free food.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Yeah people who are starving in studio apts working 60+ hours/week, just magically have land, $ to raise chickens, and more free time! Ezpz!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I work a job, pay rent, have a garden, wood work, 2 dogs, and I'm doing great. Maybe it's where you live?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It helps everyone with money in an IRA or 401k.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

B-B-B-ut if you just invest you can pull yourself up by your bootstraps! You just have to start small with a few dollars every month and in

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

a year you'll have $100 that gets wiped out by a flat tire or a doctor visit or factors beyond your control like illness or cancer.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Doctor visit will probably cost more than that

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At what point did she think she would have a say in weather she wanted to be born or not.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Poor Americans will defend this rationale cause they think they might become rich soon.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

also because they believe hierarchies are natural and egalitarianism is not: https://youtu.be/agzNANfNlTs

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its a very Protestant mindset

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Americans aren't poor, they are just temporarily inconvenienced millionaires

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Except you know that makes no sense. When it goes up, it means many more jobs, and better paying jobs. That's why going down means losing.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the last 6 months proved when the stock market goes up it doesn't necessarily mean many more or better paying jobs.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So - what this guy is saying, is when it goes up, more people have jobs, and when it goes down there are less? seems like it means a lot.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Not necessarily. Companies don't always higher more people when the market goes up.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

they also don't always fire people when it goes down either .... they're both generalisations.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's fair. It's also fair to say that the wealth gained is mainly gained by the wealthiest people, who vastly increased their fortunes

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

absolutely - the wage disparity is the biggest issue in the modern world - but pretending that the market doesn't impact everyone 1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

during a time when everyone else was struggling to keep their homes.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not rich but the stock market effects my life, my 401K. I'm just saying, the statement in this tweet is flawed.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 8

Ah 401K's... the twisted bipolar child of pensions...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Pst, your life isn't a number on a screen

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My 401k won't truly affect me until I'm 59.5 years old and retire... if I can

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I mean, I put money into my 401k every paycheck. The market helps or hurts. Also, I tapped it to buy a house. So it definitely affects me.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have one too. But I wonder how many people don't. My aunt is 62 without one.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2020 9:40 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of people on IMGUR are Americans

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an American non-student, don't presume to speak for me or anyone else.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Buying a house? Watching your investment portfolio? Cultivating your retirement funds? Congratulations, you're one of "the rich".

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

If you make $23000 a year then you are in the worlds 1%

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(Not to be confused with "the crazy rich", but still. )

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Middle claas still exists despite it getting smaller. You can make $50k/yr and still do those things. Ku

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

So how do you feel having no control over what your money's actual worth will be when you retire?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That's not how it works. I have control - I could choose to not invest in a 401k. If you want growth, you have to take some risk.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As oppossed to pension plans that were...? Garanteed pay after retirement? You have control on where you invest but if some richs dingos..1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

..decide to make huge market move or scam or whatever shady shit they can do to shift the market in their favor, what are you gonna do..2/3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who said anything about pensions? I'm not anti pension plans. Sure, sign me up for one.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The economic system in which we are is based on the assumption that people will have good will, play by the rules and nit screw each other..

5 years ago | Likes 200 Dislikes 7

Capitalism assumes everyone has a motivation to get more for themselves.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It certainly is a wishful aspect of it but one but can question a great deal about heritage...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm missing you meaning

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So not made for humans then?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You know what they say about assuming? ... The rich are gonna fuck the poor one way or the other

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

No, they have vastly different degrees of exploitation depending on the rules and system, because those rules determine its effectiveness.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Capitalism doesn't assume any of that. It has some other core assumptions that are questionable.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Anyone who argues against regulation is usually making that assumption. "Companies will do the right thing, you don't have to be a dick!"

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I don't think they're really making that assumption; that's just the sales pitch to get people to let them be a dick.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not at all. Capitalism assumes GROWTH, not any of that "being a dick" or "having good will" bullshit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Capitalism is gonna sell you crack and tell ya it's candy.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Capitalism assumes doing anything you can get away with in order to make a buck.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Tell me again how it is the only way?

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

he didn't say it was the only way, he said it's the system we are in

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Both those comments are from the same person

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cause... Growth? Yeah let's go with growth

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Never ending ravenous exploitation.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The Dow must feed!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Apparently we human beings still haven't gotten it into our stupid brains that systems which don't account for human nature will often fail.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pure neoliberalism isn't a system it's absence of system.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because every alternative gets relentlessly attacked by "this" way and none of them are immune to the corruption that ruins this way.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Read: Every country that tries anything but Capitalism gets ganged up on and sanctioned by capitalist countries.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the few that do thrive for a time, like Venezuela, are only 1 bad leader away from tanking and being used as an example...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Every economic system has to solve the problem of "Why should people work?" Capitalism: avoid starvation Communo-fascism: avoid being shot1/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Feudalism:Avoid eternal damnation/being stabbed Marxism: sense of duty/fairness. The reason "true socialism" has never been tried is that 2/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no one in power wants to risk gambling their economic production on the hope that people will behave morally. They'd rather take the safer3/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok I get you but what if we actually reformed political systems a and goverment around the idea of benefits for the society.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0