Model 1928 Thompson Submachine Gun Hidden in a Violin Case

Jul 12, 2026 10:33 PM

atensioncenter

Views

12099

Likes

481

Dislikes

14

The infamous Tommy Gun!

The old man is still a master with the Thompson. l

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From what I understand, the original model was extremely well made and therefore incredibly expensive. Something like the price of a car at the time. The later models focused massively on simplification in manufacturing to drive down the cost.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Im not into guns. But this is sexy!

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Munchkin! <3 (God, I used to love Dork Tower)

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sound on.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Keep the change, you filthy animal!

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It was only a few years ago that I found out this movie doesnt exist.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a classic.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want a full auto Thompson so bad, but that $50,000 price tag is $49,500 more than I have.

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Fun fact, a pre-war thomson at the time sold for roughly $200, or about $4000 today.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Chicago experienced a lot of mob violins in the 1920's.

1 month ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

How quickly can it be put together?

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

FYI that whole thing weighs over 40 #.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I remember working in a restaurant that hosted a meeting of the “Italian Walking Club of New Orleans.” Basically a bunch of old mob. I said to the bartender, “anybody comes through that door with a violin case, I’m over the bar and back there with you.”

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love the sound of a finely tuned violin

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Great artist

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Useless trivia alert... The M1A1 variant was the base for the Pulse rifle used in ALIENS, along with Remington M870 as the grenade launcher with a reversed Franchi spas-12 cage and shortened pump handle to cover it... 

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Definitely buying one if I ever win the lottery.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Some pawnshop on TV will surely give you 2.50 $ for it, maybe even 3.75 $ if you have certificates this Tommy Gun was used in the Valentines day massacre.

Just kidding, but it is no wonder they are swimming in money.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Using it for… violence

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Chicago Typewriter!

1 month ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 0

For letters and such...?

1 month ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

“To whom this will concern….”

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, hate mail. Especially around Valentines Day.

1 month ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Hate mail. Classic.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nothing says F U like a Chicago Typewriter.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It sends a message.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

More like Morse code. But the words all have to have letters made of dots.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH"

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Resignation letters.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I shit one at a gun range. That thing is a beast to be tamed!

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Or shot, Mayhaps…

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In Finnish we have the idiom "Eats iron, shits iron chain " (referring to a real tough guy). That just sounds like the US version of that.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, no, I like the first mental image better.
Range owner: "Hey, Happy, what the hell have you been eating?"
You: [Sounds of straining out gun parts]
Range owner: "Just wash yer hands when you done, ok?"
You: [Tears in eyes] "Uh... oh... kay..." [Sound of receiver assembly splashing into toilet bowl]

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Either way, it can hurt.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

'Hidden'... Auto-Ordnance literally sold them in these cases.

Also, the Thompson is a lie based on a falsehood perpetrating a scam... the Blish System is just frauds, all the way down....

Hell, the M1 Thompson mid-war redesign just ditched it cuz it was a lie.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I want to know who figuratively sold them in these cases.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've heard the 'Blish Principle' works...if you're dealing with naval scale artillery, and even then only kind of.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So, for high-pressure rounds like 30-06 (see the Thompson auto-rifle of 1923) where it sort of worked as a delayed blowback (just from angular forces).

But for low-pressure applications (like 45 ACP in the Thompson), it did basically nothing and it was the mass of the bolt that operated as a straight blowback... and that is why Savage Arms yanked that shit out and just threw a massive bolt in there (and dropped the weight by 12.8 ounces)

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love shooting machine guns, I love even more that somebody else pays to feed them.

1 month ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I have fired an M1 Thompson, they are not good.... they are heavy as fuck.

I carried an M249 SAW and I would take that any day of the week over the Thompson.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Almost like technology advances, huh?

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It sure does.... and the Thompson wasn't even that good in the 1920s... the MP18 was better in every way... and predated it by half a decade.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you like the SAW, try a Mk48 if you ever get the chance. Oh Baby! what a monster.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I got out in 2002 and by that time I was in a Public Affairs unit that only had M9s in its arms rooms (our plan was to 'borrow' rifles if we needed them, and there I was, asking where the machine guns were?... used to an infantry arms room with M240s and M2s)

I have never seen a Mk48, but we turned in our M60s to get 240s right before I left USAREUR

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for your Service.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

50 rounds (100?) of 45 cal is some serious fucking firepower

1 month ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

The 100 rounder is larger, it looks comically large

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

The US Army refused to issue the 50 round drum cuz it required a lot of skill to load and was not fit for combat (no good ammo pouch to carry them, very prone to dirt)... which is why only 20 round sticks were issued...

1 month ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

I can't imagine that mag had any real place on a real battlefield, now that you mention it. The wear and tear alone, reloading those finicky mechanisms, all the gunk that will eventually clog them... There won't be the ideal level of maintenance required.
And nobody will trust their life to a mag that can jam constantly.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So, the objections were far greater than any advantage... having a 16 pound SMG (weight of M1928A1 with 50 round drum) is stupid... the drum rattles when loaded, it takes 5 minutes to reload (and has to be done carefully or it just jams), the pouches were massive and rattled while you walked.

Vs, carrying 6 20-round magazines, flat... the M3 was better in every way (except the magazines which were double stack, single feed vs the thompson's double feed)

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Drum mags and helical mags are all fussy and unreliable, but they sure do look cool.

1 month ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

Sure, but like the drum mags for the M16/M4, the US Army has shown, in testing, that they offer nothing... a 90-round drum in a massive pouch vs three 30-rounders that fit in mag pouches... an argument has been made for the person on point to have one loaded, but the weight is ridiculous... and it is much better just to put a guy with a SAW next to him.

1 month ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

There are quad stack casket mags with 50+ capacity, like with the suomi or the Sites Spectre M4, but i have heard that they are difficult to load because of the spring pressure

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I spent 4 years on active duty in a US Army infantry battalion, the 200-round box for the M249 SAW (two per squad, six per platoon) was plenty of automatic weapons firepower.

A reminder that full auto is only useful for enemy suppression or a break contact drill... Semi-auto is how you put down effective, aimed fires from rifles.... let the machinguns do the machine-gunning... that is what they were designed for.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Buddy had a new Tommy gun and had the drum.

Fully loaded, it is fricking heavy and loud. The bullets move when you walk and make a bunch of noise.

1 month ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it is clicky as fuck

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The military version used during WW2 also has a significantly lower rate of fire.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, it is kind of the opposite.

M1928A1 was 600-725 cyclic rate... M1 was 700-800 (with some up to 920)... this was because of the change out from that Blish thing to just straight blowback and a lighter bolt (a reduction of almost 12 ounces of total weight)...

They realized this was insane and the M1A1 Thompson dropped it back down to 600 RPM by increasing bolt weight. The M3 was at 400-450 RPM and is ideal for close combat... remember ladies and gentlemen, short, controlled bursts.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I once fired an MG3 (aka an MG42 in 308) to get the Schutzenschnitzel ... that fucking thing fires around 1300 RPM... it is silly... it is what happens when an idiot takes an aircraft machinegun and puts a stock and a bipod on it.

Yes, I know, it was designed as a ground MG from the start, but holy shit that thing is stupid.

I can squeeze off single shots from an M60, M240, M249... the same, 'release the trigger when you feel the sear slip' lets off 3-5 rounds on the MG3.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And yet it was extremely effective for what machine guns are designed for: suppressing the enemy. It sounds fucking terrifying when you're on the receiving end of it so you kept your head down. There's a reason why it's still in service 80+ years later.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Originally as M1928A1, it could take and was issued with both box and drum magazines. The M1/M1A1 simplified the design and removed the provision to use the drum magazine. The army versions had reduced rate of fire for the bean counters and old men who thought everyone should be a marksman, but the lower rate of fire actually spoiled the natural handling of the Thompson under full auto fire. The higher rate of fire was actually more controllable in practice.

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

My father trained with one, probably when he enlisted as a sailor, he said he had to lean into it to counteract the recoil.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

With the original rate of fire, it was very controllable after the initial push, it was like a pressure washer. When they slowed it down, the recoil impulses were so spread out, it actually ruined the effect. Just goes to show, good weapons aren't designed by bureaucratic committees.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He enlisted in the late 40s so probably use the newer less optimal version

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pre-war, the US Army did stock the drums but found them heavy, bulky and unreliable... also, each M1928 was costing $202, vs the M1 Thompson only costing $45 and an M3 Grease Gun at $21.

The numbers needed didn't make sense at those costs.

For comparison, M1 Garands cost $114 pre-war, and after simplifications, got it down to as low as $31 by war's end.

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

M3 stuck around for a long time.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It did... I saw the tankers from the MS ARNG had them at NTC when we augmented them in 2000.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0