DaShanghaiKid
48915
1387
78
Oct 24, 2020 1:39 AM
DaShanghaiKid
48915
1387
78
Snooj
The Bible included its own self-destruct clause and no one noticed.
UndulatingTerrain
A 'man of God' talking out of his ass?!?
Myrectumhousesasmallindonesianfamily
Um... did he @ himself?
graehall
"Then Jesus said" - oh did he now, person who wasn't born for decades after Jesus supposedly lived writing their "gospel"?
bluerazzgummy
How is it humanly possible to lack this much self awareness?
Gweehe101
ABSOLUTELY. Obviously he didn’t give it a deep thought.
DoomGuysCousinKenneth
What version of the Bible words exodus 20:16 like this?
BC2k2
Exodus 20:16 - "Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor."
HookersandBlow
Not as if im backing him, but what biblical translation is that from? Though shalt not bear false testimony against thy neighbour
aznanimality
That's not even what that passage says lmao
aliciagames263000
Sometimes even eyewitnesses are false witnesses, as memories can be messed around with quite a bit by suggestion and peer pressure, and 1/2
aliciagames263000
Even just over time. The human brain isnt the most reliable storage method, keeping things that make sense and throwing out things that dont
AlltheSarcasm87
Video evidence isn't allowed then, gotta see it with your own eyes.../s
shyasen
No one alive today saw anything that takes place in the bible. So.....I have some news for ya.
ortahj00
Right! They should make a joke about that.. Oh wait...
hitraNoodleMonster
Thats Not what Exodus 20:16 is saying. "You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor". Dont believe either in OT or NT btw.
saintbrun
John Hagee is a human cancer.
hardlyfatal
AND everything Paul was yapping about.
Oinochoe
Shut the fuck up Hagee, you prick
SpanishMatlock
I've got some hard news about Paul.
labmonkey4life
So I don’t really use Twitter, but did he just quote himself while tagging himself?
ALeafOnTheWindWatchHowISoar
I don’t use Twitter too much myself, but yes. Yes to both questions
poughdrew
He's a slut trying to farm his own mentions.
RobMx80
Exodus is Old Testament. The Gospels are in the New Testament. New Testament supersedes, because of Christ’s sacrifice. If I’m correct.
PaintedSlate
"Supercedes" is useful shorthand covering a big topic.
WhatBackWaterCountry
And the Elves sail West to Valinor. It's amazing how many people devote their lives to an immoral fiction.
crashmat
“Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. 1/2
crashmat
No, I came to accomplish their purpose. Matthew 5:17
KootchieKoo
Apparently there's some passage where he says he's come to honor the old covenant so they use that as it ALL is law.
keenidiot
Something something not one jot or tittle has changed something something. Opinions vary by school of apologetics
ifyouoralovedonehavebeendiagnosedwithmesotheliomayoumaybe
Yeah, but morons still use the old and new to construct whatever nonsense narrative they think fits them
Sarcasticbombastic
Like if Jesus is real does everyone really believe that he won't come back angry going, "didn't you listen to anything I said??"
Stenosa83
I believe it would be sad, more than angry, but hopefully he flips one more table cos that's just funny
kingkongkeom
"I'm not even mad, just disappointed"
aliciagames263000
Kinda weird how people still keep the old testament in the bible if the rules it gives are supposed to be disregarded, especially 1/2
aliciagames263000
Considering the bible is supposed to be the word of god and ultimate source of truth 2/2
PartyLikeIts1994
Well, Jesus stated that "I have come to fulfill the covenant". As in many things in Christianity, the answer is yes and no.
millenniumf
Yeah, but the point is that none of the gospels are verified to have been written by apostles, rendering them all false testimonials.
IWishAussieAnimalsWereMoreCuddly
AFAIK, yes. Also, wasn’t the whole reason for Jesus’ sacrifice so that we’d be absolved of our sins and no longer be beholden to the old 1/3
JHawke
I don't believe in anything related to god, but this is not a rule. It's a wisdom. Jesus didn't die for random gossiping becoming fact.
IWishAussieAnimalsWereMoreCuddly
Testament, making such things as exodus irrelevant? Not I think “no gossiping” isn’t a good lesson. Still, it’s hilarious how cherry- 2/3
IWishAussieAnimalsWereMoreCuddly
Picking arguments put his own religion in the crosshairs. 3/3
llamasammich
Not to mention the edits, rewrites, and mistranslations. There are so many we have PROOF of, who knows what the originals said.
commentsivehadafew
Wait. The bible has contradictions?
graehall
Always has had.
VesuvianPrime
siflandollysiflandollyshowROCK
No, but also yes
DefaultImgurUsername
Oh, short answer, "yes" with an "if." Long answer, "no" with a "but."
RuledByMyPets
1533 in the king james version.
JamesBluntThatSmartassCunt
In the first fucking book, and from there they never stop.
Tesseract09
Yeah, the story about conning a pharoah is in there like 3 times
JamesBluntThatSmartassCunt
Two versions of the creation myth are mentioned in Genesis. First is when everything is made first then man, then the opposite.
Keairan
I mean, you compare John with the other 3 gospels there's some fairly blatant ones.
phaphachboy
We call that "open to interpretation"
Easykehl
It’s bound to happen when you compile a bunch of folk tales together and pawn it off as true events and morals beyond reproach.
Cancersasskicker
Keep it real. That is some real knowledge
Maelars
Obviously not, then we'd see multiple interpretations of it and a bunch of fractions arguing about who's right and what's relevant.
youcancallmesusanifitmakesyouhappy
Even if it all started as something true (go with me here), it has been translated, edited and rewritten so many times that there is no way/
youcancallmesusanifitmakesyouhappy
/that what we now know as the bible is the same as what was originally written. Its playing telephone with a mix of political bias over/
youcancallmesusanifitmakesyouhappy
/a couple of thousand years. Whoever thinks every word is infallible has not read enough of it to see all the fallacies. Oh im an/
youcancallmesusanifitmakesyouhappy
/ex-minister for those wondering if im talking out of my ass.
darkranger23
My argument has always been, if man cannot comprehend the word or presence of God, then even if God spoke the words of the Bible directly>>
GreyKnightTemplar666
Like the whole religion is a big contradiction of itself
dragonherder
Organized religion itself is blasphemous/contradictory to biblical teachings alone. According to the bible a "church" is what we'd consider
dragonherder
"bible study" in modern times. Church was supposed to be a small amount of people (less than 10 typically around 5) that discussed their
dragonherder
faith.
rcgom
big ones, little ones, some that are clearly typos...
SonOfLucifer
I've got a lovely bunch of contradictions, all lined up in a row
lolzpanda
And some that are just silly.