Ummmm… if you buy Campbell’s products… don’t

Nov 24, 2025 9:18 PM

zoraniko

Views

22953

Likes

784

Dislikes

28

https://www.complex.com/life/a/bernadette-giacomazzo/campbells-exec-fired-after-racist-tirade-blasting-the-3d-chicken

Andy Warhol would be pissed

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, what a shock. Corporate execs are typically such good people. Well, actually they mostly suck and are morally bankrupt.

9 months ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Many are either psychopaths or sociopaths.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They were recently fined for dumping toxic waste into a river(for years).

9 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Hey! They sell that “toxic waste” as food!

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What!!! Another corporate shit bag!

9 months ago | Likes 334 Dislikes 1

May he get Boneitis.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

someone told me Campbell's soup advertised on rush limbaugh Hate Radio show for many years, any confirmation? i don't see anything searching. (ps. i suspect limbaugh was an Epstein pedophile, limbaugh vacationed in the Caribbean.)

9 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

He was caught with a bogus Viagra prescription coming back from the Dominican Republic. Connect the dots, if you have the stomach for it.

9 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"the good ol' days" - pepperidge farm remembers.meme

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn’t we used to live in a world where the shit bag saying fucked up shit would get fired and not the person that caught them saying fucked up shit?

9 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

That world has sailed... "Shoot the Messenger" is very fashionable right now.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

i thought the sodium levels were bad, no that i see bigotry and greed are also in there, i'm glad i haven't eaten any of that slop since the 1960's

9 months ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 2

we could be twins.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I like the chicken noodle cans when I'm sick :(
This sucks

9 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

there's several other brands to choose from

9 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Apparently he ranted off some racist shit too about employees

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never thought their food products were actually good. Not much for soup in any event.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

not canned for supermarkets, but they do make soups for restaurants as well.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Got to say the description of the meat is accurate

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Campbells is just expensive store brand cans soup anyway ,

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Also, what's he talking about with the 3-D printed meat? That kinda stuff is years away from not being luxury. You're not gonna find it in regular grocery store canned soup.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Jokes on you, real poor people can't afford Campbell's, we buy store brand

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait, Campbells soups aren't high quality ingredients sourced ethically and part of a balanced diet? v

9 months ago | Likes 226 Dislikes 1

Yeah it's the racist part thats the issue tbh.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

They're priced as if they are. Actual high quality, ethically sourced foods are priced like rare delicacies...

9 months ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

You apparently don’t buy them. The price hovers around a dollar in and I think that’s pretty good. It is your healthy shoe that three times the price.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's the joke.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But the price had been that way for 20 years. Bioengineer 3-d chicken hardly fits.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bro my Walmart has them listed at 85 cents. I’d be more shocked if they WERE natural ingredients. poverty doesn’t let you boycott.

9 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Yeah, same, or 3 for $2, which is what I do if I buy condensed soap

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s crazy because I just looked up cans for sale . can without lid a case of 272 is $386 . Meaning each can is $1.42. Of course Campbells probably has a volume discount so let’s say 1/3 of 1.42 is about $,50. $.85-$.50 =$ .35 for contents , labels, lid, and shipping and retailers markup.

9 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Tuna Mac ftw. Ugh.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just wait till Andy Warhol hears about this!!!!

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It would confirm what he thinks about commercialism; and thus, the reason for his art.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But.. but isn't this precisely what's its meant to be. Cheap non perishable food

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are those not accurate statements?

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And here i am writing a paper on the 5400 violations of the Clean Water Act they have committed since 2018 by dumping waste into the Maumee River...

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Heaven forbid someone expose their hatred for the low income buyers to the public says the people that don't know how to keep that crap to themselves. We must fire the person that recorded us because it wasn't our fault we said those things.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You wouldnt print a chicken.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

If I learned anything from Star Trek: The Next Generation, it's that we absolutely would, if we could.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have a family member who works for them….

And I was a contractor for four years who they wouldn’t hire so that they could easily cut people loose without reporting layoffs.

They basically fired all of the local employees in Camden New Jersey a few years ago, where their headquarters in. And this after claiming they would help the community with employment.

Shit company.

Shit morals.

Don’t buy their shit.

9 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

That's every large corporation. The expectation at mine, is 20% of all organizations/LOBs are contracted. For "flexibility"

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hq in a poc (with very high national murder rate) city...this dirtbag must work remotely

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You’d be right.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do we organize to actually solve this problem? If we just started showing up at the CEOs' houses en masse, even just stopped them from using their driveways by standing on public property, this shit would end. They just need to feel it *personally*.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In Minecraft, their houses are extremely flammable tootoo.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, I'm not opposed to some good old Minecraft griefing, but we can do this without PVP. Then there's much less risk to all of us!

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Idk why too² ended up there. Grr typos.

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"If accurate, the comments in the recording are unacceptable." oh fuck off campbells.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actual poor people can't afford Campbell's anyway. Not for many years. Who pays $4 for a tiny can of salt water so they can still be full after they eat it? I figured it was all Yuppie soccer mom types who don't know how to cook using them to make sauces & casseroles.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Campbell's have been scumbags since the 1690's.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1690s?

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whistleblower protection?

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Probably the foundation of the lawsuit, yeah

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't that illegal?

9 months ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 4

9 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Depends on the state or states where the recording was taken.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes, embarrassing your boss is a crime punishable by death.

9 months ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

You have been reassigned to janitorial. Pray I do not reassign you further.

9 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

"You have been promoted to customer."

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I doubt it. Embarrassing your boss isn't protected. But even if they were protected for that act, at-will employment is awful. As long as Campbell's doesn't say why they're firing the employee, they'll be in the clear.

9 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

They're going to claim he's not a whistleblower and that he disrupted the call by pressing record and that he didn't have authority to start the recording. And possibly some file charges for illegal recording depending on the state. I know at my job, they recently implemented a "mute everyone and turn off your camera" when you enable recording to comply with GPDR

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Recording people without their consent isn't necessarily illegal, but a boss of a private company can absolutely fire you for it, and in most states a recording that isn't consented to isn't admissible evidence in court.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

not to mention it's not uncommon at all for it to be a breach of contract in the form of corporate conduct and immediately a fireable offense. Plenty of offices I've worked out entire swathes of areas prohibited recording audio, taking photos, and videos in any form and it was a fireable offense on the spot. Meetings had exceptions if a director formally approved it to be recorded beforehand. This was at insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies.
.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*eleven states

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Uhh... no. Why would it be?

9 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I’m assuming they are referring to recording someone in a two-party consent state, which is illegal. Case in point: Linda Tripp.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why would there be a lawsuit if it is legal?

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because they didn't like that they got fired. You can file lawsuits for anything.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Sure… but ordinary folks rarely do because of legal fees and fear of counter-suits. And you do have to cite some law that’s been broken, or there’s no case.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"The lawsuit accuses Campbell’s of retaliation and fostering a racially hostile work environment." - making the company look bad by exposing private conversations to the public is something they can legally terminated your employment for, so I don't think he has a real case unless there is some bald-faced racism in there.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't really have to cite a broken law for a lawsuit. You can cite things as vague as being caused distress. Polar had to deal with a lawsuit a bit back for their lemon seltzer not tasting lemony enough. It's not all that rare to file lawsuits you know you don't have a winning case for against wealthy corporations because you assume they'll settle out of court. That said, I have no idea on how valid the case here is, just saying the presence of a lawsuit proves nothing either way.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually, many times a lawsuit is filed with the hope that the other side will want to quickly settle the case out of court to avoid "bad PR".

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The firing? Probably not, since what he said was just embarrassing. If he'd said something illegal, then maybe.
OR maybe you meant the recording? Depends upon the location they were recording in, different laws in different places.

9 months ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 3

Could be considered retaliation for whistle blowing for an ethical issue.

9 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The article says that he "hit record" during an online meeting, so the tool likely notified the boss that they were being recorded. That said, the complaint calls forth "racism" but none of the quotes in the article are racist (although the article only mentions a couple of things from a 1 hour rant)...that's because most people can be legally fired at any time for any reason

9 months ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Not for reasons that are illegal. If they're at will the company can give zero reason for termination but if they give a reason they have to prove that reason. And they especially can't fire someone over their race, religion, sexuality, or gender.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which is why the complaint says "racism", because that is one of those things, and I pointed out that the article didn't report on anything racist being said.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If i can hear it with my ears, my devices can hear it too. I dont need to ask permission. I have cube acr on my phone and it records every call. I just use the free version. Anywhere that doesn't allow that is bs.

9 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

True. But those places exist.
"Eleven (11) states require the consent of everybody involved in a conversation or phone call before the conversation can be recorded. Those states are: California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington."

9 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Utter nonsense I say. Like i can record it with my brain but not my other devices?

9 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Correct. These states make it part of the wiretapping laws. U have to have a warrant in order to secretly record conversations in those states. And penalties of anywhere from a fine to jail time depending of each state. But note at the person recording is required to follow the law of the state they are presiding in.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My wife often complains, "You eat like a rich man!" because I won't put most processed foods into my mouth. I live mostly on fruits, nuts, and dairy. I don't think I've opened a can in the 21st century.

9 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about roasted veggies. Da best way to eat veggies! Sprinkle some shredded Parmesian on top & dig in.

9 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds like you eat more like a 15th century serf than a rich man.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That may be the case. But I spend less money on food than my wife does, and consume better quality nutrition than she does. She likes pastries, pretzels, chips, marshmallows, and ice cream. I like yogurt, apples, figs, and raisins. My BMI is steady at 22.5, hers is 29. To me, eating like a rich man means eating better quality food for less money.

9 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0