Iblamemyparentstoo
117110
1628
20
Not only is this guy for real but he doubled down on the stupidity!
https://twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1585748377010069509?t=XpBA65VtQE-nJee8QZGyQg&s=19
DaveDreamsOfDumplings
He is in no way 'for real'. He's trolling, and everybody keeps feeding him EXACTLY what he wants. Ignore him, he'll go away
XXXSpork
Alpha male = insufferable asshole. The label checks out.
DJOldguy
Didn't realize he was Australian. Fuck me, I know lot of Aussies and I bet they would be horrified at his clear and open fuckwittery.
M4UsedRollout
Don't engage with Nick Adams. He's not a serious person.
Iatesomecoffeecups
I'm 99% certain this guy makes satire
MrCheesebiscuit
I'm beginning to think I know more about the American Constitution than these twats. I'm Dutch FFS! And to call yourself alfa male... Geez!?
Gryphonosiris
I'd say it's 100% likely that you do.
nvme9361
This has to be some sort of parody or comedy account. Nobody is that tone deaf
pablozzyzzk
Clearly, this man has never read either one.
KrebstarCorporation
Nick Adams is Australian and he used to look like Meatloaf’s stunt double
ToSisPoS
Now for no reason, here’s an asshole with his opinion.
Syko73
When they try to get you bogged down in defending blatant facts is when you walk away from the conversation.
Syko73
Unfortunately, thats when they declare victory because you "cant win the argument"
JonnyRockstar11
you know what alpha males don't do? label themselves as alpha males...
LostChaosKnight
Alpha male
sickofmkingnames350
Nick Adams (Incel Male)
JudahDeNose
This guy is a troll; you have been baited by him. His jokes are similar to his beliefs, yet still jokes.
Jackpot7777777
Why do conservatives hate America for its freedoms?
noxseth
This has to be a fake/troll account.
RussianMathNinja
No, this is the real account of Nick Adams, former conservative Australian politician.
ATLandNerdy
The constitution, like the bible, have a very large enthusiastic fan base that have never read it.
DeadWhiteMale
I never heard of Nick Adams, but if this tweet is representative, he's an idiot, i.e., a Republican frontrunner.
TheTaoTakesPictures
lol no REAL alpha male would actually openly refer to themselves as alpha male. Alpha males are compassionate, comfortable in their own skin
Rustbelt
He's a fucking clown. One of the best jokes I've made was "He's a pretty Sarah Huckabee Sanders" to this:
Iblamemyparentstoo
Why are you getting down voted that's funny
Rustbelt
I was confused myself. But Imgur can be fickle.
Rustbelt
It seems like letting the Americans wake up really tilted the voting.
SylvesterMarcus
I think he’s just a really good troll.
iggylights
It's literally in the first amendment. Not the fifth. Not the 10th. You only need to read as far as the 1st Mr alpha male.
Stabmatic
Fuckin' zeta brain on this alpha over here.
madeejit
Even the Bible doesn't rule it out. "Render unto Caesar those things that are Caesar's..."
uppercasenumbers
We should also note the order of the constitution/ amendments have 0 significance.
DarkRedCape
If he had ever read it, he’d know this.
PrincessWendyB
IF HE COULD READ AT ALL...!
darthOnion
My how antidisestablishmentarianist of him.
Poopaloupe
Alpha male? That boy is a power bottom if there ever was one.
WowSoSparkly
stop equating gay sex to being a bad person
Poopaloupe
k... I think uh... well... alright then... you uh...
SomeDetroitGuy
I don't think you know what a power bottom is.
Poopaloupe
ah... a power bottom can still be alpha--I'm so sorry.
oliharris19697
I’m pretty sure this is a parade account
BythepowerofPlank
Imagine having so low self-esteem you have to put ''(alpha male)'' in your username
DigiT00l
He has been found to be a troll account
ATLandNerdy
No, no, no, look, it has a blue check, it's really him!
chbarts
I'm pretty sure he's running a ragebait account. Just trolling everyone.
Iblamemyparentstoo
Then go read his tweets, and you'll walk away sad that there truly are people this stupid in the world disappointed.
jayrod850315
He doesnt even have facial hair! Cmon man lol
Beardologist
The two things are not related. When I made jokes in the past linking the two it was satirical, but Poe's law... Encourage beards, not shame
loveisallwereallyhave
That’s so low Simone Biles would blow her back back out reaching for it.
ATLandNerdy
It's one of those things where if you have to say it, it's not true. Like being in charge, or unafraid, or funny, or smart.
Chicagorooftop
precisely.
Mcmaclassie
Fun fact: Anyone that calls themselves and "alpha male" isnt.
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong (Penis Problems)
deltaforcain
How will people know otherwise? He clearly doesn’t behave or look like an alpha male
icannotthinkofanyrationalname
Alpha, as in, not ready for release, and unfit for daily use.
acejlp
That's the equivalent of driving a BMW
DarkwingDuc
If you think that's bad, imagine having so low self-esteem you listen to someone who puts ''(alpha male)'' in their username,
leodavinci1
They're very much into things that are make believe.
clarkieboy
but it's pronounced 'all female'
RibbleTPibits
I gotta say… Ω Man sounds significantly cooler.
ATLandNerdy
But what if you're the Alpha and the Omega?
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
Then people will do a shitton of torturing and killing in your name
ATLandNerdy
RedDDarko
Horseshoe man?
thorinc
That's the uppercase omega symbol, so Omega Man, which was a really good 1971 film (and book before that), which the movie I Am Legend 1/
thorinc
is based on. 2/2
Skuggen
Thekindofkindlyman
If irony were strawberries, we’d all be drinking daiquiris right now
staceyjorgenson31415
And now I really want a daiquiri ;)
kozzillakilla
I want a drink every time I see GQP rhetoric
billbobagsh0t350
ThaWhiteRanger
drksdrlife
MrOne2
This is fake, right? Right?
jimmyriba
Are we sure this isn't a parody account?
Iblamemyparentstoo
Yes, 100% sure it's NOT a parody/satire account
jimmyriba
But how the hell...? It's indistinguishable from parody to me. Like, it has lots of little "parody tells". I guess Poe's law really works.
Iblamemyparentstoo
Nothing about maga republicans makes any sense
RussianMathNinja
No, that is Nick Adam's real account, all right.
Kristie72
No no. He really IS that ignorant.
dundeeisdrunk
Hahah Fuck off this is this a spoof account? No one can be that dumb can they?
Iblamemyparentstoo
Why, you're proving otherwise
kozzillakilla
Whoever is writing the script for the GQP got lazy when they realized it sorta doesn’t matter what they say.
RussianMathNinja
Nah, that's the real Nick Adams. He's pretty damn dumb: when he was a Deputy Mayor in Australia, he put forward a motion to ban pigeons 1/?
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
So far I agree
RussianMathNinja
from his municipality, due to fear of bird flu. Nobody has any idea how the fuck he intended to actually implement that. 2/2
BellyBrush
How do morons get so high up the food chain? Is it the daddysmoney fund?
DarthVaderDidNothingWrong
By telling them to leave. He's that Alpha.
dundeeisdrunk
Well he’s republican so I guess he doesn’t really need a plan. Just an empty promise. Or blame the dems
marthafarquar
The term was originally coined to describe the neurotic behaviour of wolves from different packs forced to live in a 2000 sq/ft enclosure
FrogBotherer
And there are, in fact, no "alpha males" in real wolf packs.
AnonOmis1000
Genuine question, do wild wolf packs not have a leader of some description?
FrogBotherer
Only in the sense that most wild wolf packs consist of a breeding pair of wolves and their offspring. There's no dominance hierarchy.
Taxicat
They have parents. That’s it. There is no strict hierarchy beyond that.
AnonOmis1000
Gotcha. Thanks!
brianglass10
The 1st Amendment to the Constitution "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…”
YureiBlank
But what about -disrespecting- literally every single other one...?
SoraHjort
By disrespecting all but one, that is respecting one, thus still in violation.
gtollie
That’s not the original Constitution.. that’s an amendment! /s
Rogerwilco1974
bUt WhErE iS ThE wOrD sEpErAtIoN?!
Rogerwilco1974
Indeed, that was part of the joke! Well spotted!
Rubblebubble
ok so this is a really pernicious thing, because they don't want to "establish a national religion" or make it illegal for other religions..
Rubblebubble
to exist, their argument is that the country should be guided/ruled by Christian values and that ISN'T explicitly in the constitution....
Rubblebubble
it IS in the federalist papers but those aren't legally binding at all. it's a problem that is rapidly approaching
futuremonkey
Article VI: "... no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
Rubblebubble
Yes but again that's not what they're trying to do, they're trying to pass legislation based on evangelical "teachings" enforcing their...
xaviar3000
I mean I’m here for running a country with Christian values like forgiving all loans every 4 years, and caring for sick and unhoused..
Rubblebubble
Oh yeah, also the whole respecting the laws of the lands you're in " give unto the Romans..." Actual christian teachings would be GREAT.
heywoodjabme
If they are good with turfing that one, what about the second amendment?
aPinchofMensch
That doesn't cause a "separation" between "church and state." If it did, then we wouldn't have the current christian domination we do.
Kristie72
You failed HS Civics, didn't you?
aPinchofMensch
HS or even College level civics would tell you there's no explicit separation of church and state in the US constitution.
SomeDetroitGuy
It sure meant it to the people whonactually wrote it.
aPinchofMensch
If it did, they would've been more explicit. As it stands, its about as vague as the 2nd is about explicit gun regulation.
abion47
Bold of you to assume that the people in the GOP give two shits about observing things like "separation of church and state".
aPinchofMensch
Like, nobody up until 1971 cared. That's when the establishment clause actually starts to get defined. So you gonna point the finger at -
abion47
The phrase "under God" wasn't added to the pledge of allegiance until 1954 as a reaction to the Cold War. Issues surrounding the 1st and 2nd
abion47
amendments didn't arise until the last century when new political movements started radicalizing rural America by focusing on religion and
spectheintro
I'm sorry, this is categorically untrue. We have tons of primary sources from the Founders about why that amendment was created, and (1/2)
spectheintro
similar religious freedom statutes that predated it, all of which were aimed explicitly to keep church and state separate. There's a (2/3)
spectheintro
literal quote from Jefferson where he says: "... thus building a wall of separation between Church & State." (3)
aPinchofMensch
Jefferson, that President that sent missionaries to convert Native Americans? Yeah, he cared sooo much about religious freedom and -
Rubblebubble
you're right but the problem is we have a bunch of christofascist "originalists" on the supreme court. the supporting docs are not legally..
painstream
It's almost as if certain clauses were systematically ignored or gamed in order for a dominant religion to accumulate power...
aPinchofMensch
It would require the 1st amend to be explicit on what is and isn't allowed to have any enforcement ability.
Lovethesmelloftoastedsourdoughbread
As they do with their "holy book"
FrogBotherer
It totally does, bringing religious doctrine into US law would require the establishment of a national religion.
aPinchofMensch
If it did what you think it does, how did we get here then? Because it goes well beyond simple non-enforcement of the 1st amend.
nemesisx00
*looks at all the anti-abortion laws* You sure about that?
Rubblebubble
it doesn't, it's a problem that it's not explicit. they're making laws based on christian values which is technically legal.
Rubblebubble
they're not restricting people from expressing their religions or mandating a religious test for office. it's a technicality and it's dumb..
Rubblebubble
but it's technically legal, similar to their argument that our country isn't a democracy it's a republic, technically correct but...