.

Jul 12, 2017 1:34 PM

KeepingRepostStatsBusy

Views

209036

Likes

3967

Dislikes

157

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We already lost consumer choice since the companies made a virtual monopoly on who serves where

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

That's because we've sort of hand an unspoken agreement to treat the internet as a utility.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Overbearing regulations and government picking favorites is what led to this. The state should just btfo and open the markets.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn, I'm going to miss www.video.com

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Oh shit Disney actually bought that address?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a power engineer, I have so many problems with this cartoon. @TimmyDans

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Like Potheads without power lines? Or the fact that this schlub is coming out of his ivory tower climbing the utility pole with out any of1/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

His Personal Protective Equipment. OSHA would have a field day in the union doesn't get to him first. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2edgy4me

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jokes on them, my internet is wireless

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

I weep for you, pleb.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

wow, are you naive

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Same as drug companies. The higher the profits the more innovation they can develop. Bullshit!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Watch, our website access will be limited during times of elections to keep us blind. This will not be good.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They dont have to limit access when they just outright lie to you anyways. Like they do right now.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

www.gofccyourself.com "I support strong net neutrality, backed by Title 2 oversight of ISP."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Gop fucked us. Fuck them back

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

No, the GOP was very clear about their stance from the beginning. It's people who voted for them in spite of not doing research that did.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So what if the GOP wants to do all this stuff I hate. What's the other choice? Vote for a pinko demoncrat?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

UNITED WE SURF DIVIDED WE TIMEOUT

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

what do any of these corporations stand to lose? they already monopolize the resource, unless you can go without, you are stuck.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

There's no upper limit as far as they're concerned. If there's a way to grab more money it's a priority, and we've shown

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

how little we'll fight back, so they have nothing to lose by trying. No matter how Captain Planet Villain the schemes get.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Maybe we have to be the ones to cut the cable. Like literally destroy their fiber lines if they dont stop this shit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they probably have insurance

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

probably, but I know there have been vandals who cut fiber cables and it was like 15 million in damages. They wanna break our internet(1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

hah yeah, we had someone driving a lift around a school I worked for, he didnt lower the lift and got closelined on fiber. $$$$$

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

maybe someone should break theirs?(2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Thanks Trump!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I work for a company that makes optical fiber. When I see cut lines I see dollar signs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This whole thing just reminds me of when politicians were trying to justify letting only one airline fly intercontinental flights.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In order to "protect the American people"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

question: if we lose net neutrality, is there any way to get it back with another administration or is it gone for good?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sure. Laws can change. But it's gonna be a lot harder. The people who don't give a shit about this issue also traditionally vote a lot 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

so it's not an issue that will likely be pushed for with the next administration. Maybe in 30 years it will, if we can still remember.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If the ISPs don't cut out the dissent with blocking of webpages that hold it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This will pass without ANY real opposition.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is...is that a Bell Atlantic logo on his tie? What year was this cartoon?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty old, I think early 2000s is when I first saw it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But seriously what's the justification. They have to claim it helps somehow?? Or is the argument you can't force them to carry a website?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It would let them charge huge sites like Netflix and YouTube extra for the ridiculous amounts of data that they use. Problem is, (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(2/2) those extra charges will just be passed on to the consumer.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They say it keeps them from "innovating" or providing "quality service" or one of other BS excuses they use to hide their money boners.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

honest question, what lies are "they" feeding us to convince us that we'll be better off without net neutrality?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Governt oversight hinders innovation and economic growth (for the companies).

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't get it, I need a dozen more metaphorical labels to understand.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great. Now I'll have to go back to getting my usersub OC off the bathroom stalls in bars

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Quick, while his back is turned.. SHOOT HIM, then bury him in a shallow grave behind that cute little house.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Edit: the last cable to be cut = nudes

9 years ago | Likes 511 Dislikes 10

You could have rallied people by saying "neutrality."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

More likely ads

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oh shit call batman, yes we don't deserve him yadda yadda yadda just save the nudes...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

BASTARDS

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't double dip

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

SMELLS OF HERECY

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that's how the revolution happened, grandchildren.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NOOOOOOOOO

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SACRILEGE

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Historically it's pedophilia

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or cats. Because there's no way to tell if there's more cats or porn on the internet.

9 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 1

Schrödinger's cable? Untill you cut it it's both.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One way or the other. It's pussy.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pussy cats, pussy and ass pussy?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Only one way to be sure. You start watching cat videos... I'll see how much porn there is.

9 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

Does 10hr nyan cat videos count? Because you'll need time to "refresh your browser".

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I don't know what "nyan" is, but I'm about to Google it. Wish me luck.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well now that you'll be introducing yourself you the annoying side of the internet. May i also point you towards Crazy Frog.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah, how good that I dont live in the USA...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh its going to hit you too bruh. most of the internet is in the us.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, Imgur is also in the US. Pretty sure if just that line alone was added everyone on Imgur would be on board with stopping this.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sooner or later it will get fucked anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if I remember correctly the argument isnt that "we'll be better off this way" it's "theres no reason to think they'd actually do that..."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember those that stand to profit, will often put that ahead of all else.

9 years ago | Likes 887 Dislikes 3

Would you not say that by supporting net neutrality you stand to profit?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That assumes they can't profit more by being against it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My point was, absolutely everyone does things because they stand to profit from them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We can't blame them - companies exist to make profit! This is why free markets are only good for certain things.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually it depends on how a corporation writes it's founding articles. They could start or switch to being B-Corps which are required to

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

meet social sustainability & environmental performance standards, etc., not only make profit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was just thinking that middle wire still holding together should have been labelled "money" or "profit" or something along those lines.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dang, well put

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fucking Verizon.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does that include the parties that want the government to rule all aspects of our lives?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Welcome to America

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love the Bell symbol on his shirt! Priceless.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like Moses

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 24

Hiw does the jewish prophet profit from this?

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

They control everything, do you even Mein kampf bro?!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

No no he meant mooses

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Goddamn those meese

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Carefully

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Family. Religion. Friendship. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business." ~C.M. Burns

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

So the voters must make the political costs greater than the financial gains.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well the shareholders are who matters fuck the public who gives a shit about them

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Isn't TWC/Spectrum owned by AT&T?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember AT&T used to own everything good ole ma bell

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, they're another telecom conglomerate. Ironically they're all retuning back into one huge monopoly like how Bell was.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Spectrum is a Charter telecoms company. TWC sold off a large portion in order to get a better possibility to merge with ATT

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hooray capitalism

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

American capitalism*

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

More like Facism. Don't blame capitalism. Capitalism good.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Capitalism is fine. We REALLY need regulations on it

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

lol ok

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I like socialism until I have a long weekend. Then I remember why it's pointless.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Why?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but muh free market

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

"Like hell! You are a fucking commie!" - too many americans

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Everything in moderation.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just remember America: YOU VOTED FOR THIS. Complaining now is just hypocrisy.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

No, we didn't vote for this. It doesn't work like that mate. Just like Brexit one part of the population got what it wanted.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Its been going on regardless of party.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

The current action is literally to reverse an action the other party took.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

After the entire internet screeched at them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Are you retarded?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Remember PIPA? That was written by a democrat. SOPA was widely popular on both parties until the internet had an aneurism.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Call me whatever you want, but in the end all participants in the legislative system are money whores. Republicans, Democrats, same bullshit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last neutrality vote changed because of protests. The FCC was predominantly democrat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally nobody wants this besides corporate interests. It's the perfect signifier of the amount of corruption in this country

9 years ago | Likes 888 Dislikes 9

I've got a pole those stupid corporate fucks can climb.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

There are people still against Net Neutrality and the two reasons are ignorance to what it is and "OMG GUVRMNT HURR NO!"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is dead accurate

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

not true (pro net neutrality here), I had a debate with a friend just last night where he has against net neutrality. Has it in his mind

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

that we need to keep the government out of things, including the internet

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then he would replace the government with a corporate monopoly. I think it's a much worse option

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tried explaining that to him. no luck

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, I don't even understand why they'd want it, what do they even do with their time off, do they never use internet ?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They want it because it gives then easy power of monopoly, and monopoly means big money.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No what I mean is, I do understand getting rich at the others expense, it makes sense, but why do it at your own

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's like saying 'you can get any pizza you want for free whenever, but any other than this one is gonna taste like shit'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't care about the quality of the internet, or the detriment to others and possibly to themselves. The money and control blinds them

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*In the Republican party, essentially the only people actually pushing against Net Neutrality.

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 6

Well, I think you mean their donors.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There is no difference.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And it's more than just a donor thing. Republicans see this as government regulation against business.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And everyone on the right opposes it because Obama introduced it. It's literally a fight just for spite.

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 11

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 23

As a centrist with primarily Republican friends and family, they most certainly do not oppose it.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Your friends and family don't and that is great.lots of people do though. It often comes from blindly opposing left ideals

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

I use to say, "Obama could cure cancer and the right would complain that he is killing jobs because of it."

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Dec 30, 2017 10:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Who the FUCK said that?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I mean I won't unite under Trump, but I have no real hate for lefties or righties. We do go through this song and dance a lot.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I never said to unite around Trump. I could see how that might be seen that way. I meant the people need to unite not further divide.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump is literally skipping meetings the dude is nt the guy to unite under

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then unite against, I never said to unite around him.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's more of a fight about govt control and overreach...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 30

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

you dont know what net neutrality is. without it ISP's can block or massively slow access to sites that dont pay up or go against their 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

interests such as a ISP with very conservative religious people in charge could block access to anything about abortion. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

If government is so bad, why do you elect such assholes who dick suck for money whilst throwing everyone else under the bus?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They may not start out that way. Power corrupts.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then stop re-electing them once they are corrupt.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can't speak for everyone, but my states gerrymandering made it to the courts it was so bad. Sometimes they aren't legitimately elected.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want it repealed, I dont agree with Title 2 and the power is gives the government to regulate my internet connection availability, speed,

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 49

Price, and everything else thats associated with forced competition in public utilities and infrastructure costs. Pai agreed with everyone

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 31

And voted along with the democrats for the first part, unthrottled, uncensored, he even broke up unfair data practices from cell comps n mor

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 24

So you want ISPs to cut you down even more just because they can?

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Power that is necessary in order to stop ISPS abuse of the American public. Millions of Americans don't have access to reliable broadband

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Oooooo that dirty government! Making me pay a little more for electricity just to prevent global catastrophe! Regulation bad!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont think American need broadband speeds. Congress changed the definition to 25 MBps. I live in a house with 4 people, we use a 10MBps

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 20

With no issues at all. Why regulate my ISP and providers to force them to give everyone the option to buy 25MBps from 2 sources regardless

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

Of the cost it will bear on them to bring internet out into the boonies?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Muh ISPs! Won't someone please think of muh poor ISPs! Their ceos are forced to live on the streets as paupers. We must help them get more $

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And you cant just make laws regulating that? I siagree with you, thats why theres a debate about NN.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

*disagree

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Actually the whole reason it got moved to Title 2 was because ISPs were doing shit but courts ruled that as title 1 things the gov couldn't1

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Actually do anything to stop them. 2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Service, Millions are forced to remain with one ISP and deal with hidden fees and data caps, poor infrastructure due to lack of investment

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Did this approach work for Flint? Or any other group devistated by public utility failures? Obvi pleading the Q here, we both did

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Someone have the simpsons think of the children meme? Cant find it

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What does regulating them as a public utility deal with them suddenly willing to invest more in meaningful infrastructure?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Do you really want to continue with that?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

So you the a free internet, or a government-run internet? which is it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I had this same thought, but saddened by those who defend it because their leaders voted for it

9 years ago | Likes 197 Dislikes 3

Thats the opposite of the way interest are designed to flow

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Representatives are supposed to vote the way the people they represent want. Why the fuck is the opposite happening?

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 1

How many of those miserable fucks have their job because of the color of their campaign signs and not the things they've done?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because they realized they could line their pockets with corporate money, fuck over their constituents, and be perfectly fine.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it! 1,500 years ago, everybody knew that the 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 4

...kids love cinnamon toast crunch for it's lack of mercury. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Earth was the center of the universe 500 years ago, everybody knew that the Earth was flat." Agent K

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That was Ptolemy's fault. Prior to ~120 AD most people believed in Heliocentrism. That a spherical Earth has been known since 220 BC.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But, I can't remember where I know him from.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

SCIENCE IS A LIAR ... sometimes

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0