Confident installer's demonstration

Sep 4, 2026 2:47 AM

adelcasa

Views

20562

Likes

390

Dislikes

10

Jesus. It's good to be confident in your installation, but you can never be confident in the manufacture.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Now that’s a little something to pucker the ol’ sphincter

That’s a big nope-the-fuck o’clock from me.

3 weeks ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Gary Hoy did that once to demonstrate the strength of skyscraper glass….once.

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

According to the wiki he'd do it as a way to show off to new employees. One day the glass fell out of the frame.

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Russian oligarcs will be installing this wherever they live.

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"Men die in accidents more often than women."

3 weeks ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Men also have -in average- better stories to tell

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And that's no accident.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was just thinking... Won't abusing the installation like this weaken it, making it more likely to break later?
Also, i believe white netting is less UV stable than proper UV protected black fiber, so how well will this do after a year of sunlight?

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

give a child 1 minute and he will figure out to get on the other side of it

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This child arrives with wire cutters

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bring a $5 pair of wire cutters with me, got it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But will it keep him in on a full moon?

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's what the peanut butter and XL kong are for.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When the fullmoon gooner is chasing him?

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine being the customer when he falls through!

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Well good we caught this problem early on!"

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Time to call for a refund!

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Idiots tend to be very confident, I think there's a name for it

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All I could think was there are days when I feel that level of desperation to end it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Might be an effective drone deterrent?Keep the blast from the foundational Infrastructure a bit?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

did we learn nothing from Garry Hoy?

3 weeks ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 1

I mean the glass technically didn't break.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I assume that's the uhh lawyer was it? That kept throwing himself on the glass in a high ride saying it was unbreakable but then the whole panel came out of the frame ?

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Tbf the glass didnt break the frame popped out

3 weeks ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

Dead is dead, can't argue your case from the grave

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Case in point. You can trust the product, but how much do you trust everything else involved?

3 weeks ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Very good point

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I could honestly see chunks of the building the fence is attached to letting go

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Yeah, he said:

"FFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK".

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I think he actually said, “FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU—“

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I think it was
“FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuuuu…..splat”

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

ˢᵖˡᵃᵗ

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He stands by his work i respek

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And if there's a fire?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Garth Ennis cooked with Punisher MAX and basically only that.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't necessarily disagree but I'm not sure how that's relevant?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't people just cut it??

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I could get through that easily. I own a pair of scissors.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

incompetent installer's demo:
https://imgur.com/LgFAA4A.mp4

3 weeks ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Per second- per second.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He installed his nuts in that fence.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 weeks ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Yikes and away... yikes and away...yikes and away...

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lucky that fence was there to break his fall. (/s)

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

no /s - the mesh and pipe did cushion the landing a lot

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It did bend, so perhaps not all bad

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Agreed. repeated small hits siphoning off kinetic energy are always better then one single hit absorbing everything

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly! Thats why race car drivers can survive what seems like an insane flipping crash, where as the crashes that stop quickly, but seem less violent, are actually much deadlier. Having said that, it did focus his fall energy on a smaller point in his stomach area, full of rupturable spleens and kidneys and such. Either way, he ain't okay.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He's balls helped quite a bit as well

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What, uh... what did he expect to happen there?

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

land on the tree like a 170 lb squirrel

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

the fuck at the end seals it in nice

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Poor Gary Hoy. Nobody would remember him now if it wasn't for that one monumentally stupid demonstration.

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

his has not tried with his children

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yeah, it works, dude. fuckin quit.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

let me pick the balcony he jumps off

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Toronto had one called Gary Hoy that threw himself against a office 24th floor window to show it was unbreakable only to fall to his death. As much as I think it's good to want to prove your work is safe, I'm pretty sure there is a non-life threatening way to do it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 408 Dislikes 1

Came to say this!

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

At no point in this demo does this man not have 2 points of contact... Still risky, but less life-threatening than literally running full tilt with no bracing at all. So, technically, we did?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember the plexiglass commercial when the CEO went to jump out the window and it didn't break? Unless that was a fever dream... Or a movie?.... I'm pretty sure they did it in the Hudsucker Proxy

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In defense of the window, it didn't break, the whole pane popped out of the frame, likely weakened from all the previous times he'd thrown himself in to it

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He trusted it and was willing to die on that hill

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... Throw someone else?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also too idk if i'd wanna live in a fucking chicken pen. And chainlinked(looking) guards on the balcony sure do feel that way.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His hands don't leave the railing for the first part of it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Use your locally-sourced CEO.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was demonstrating that to a class of children after one asked him about it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It didn't break, but the frame came apart, IIRC

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Like throwing an inanimate object against the window - but where’s the theatricality in that?

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

At under 30 floors the body will bounce when it hits the ground. THEATER!!!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really? Then the new resident evil movie screwed up big time in the raining zombies trailer.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All I know is top floor was 30th, and he bounced. Though if they're slightly decayed, maybe more splat?

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Musk and the bullet proof truck has entered the chat

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Proof that the inanimate object method is definitely safer for the presenter - but the theatricality turned from drama to comedy. I think the issue might be theatrics.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this tells me is that this man is willing to risk people's lives unnecessarily, which is kind of exactly the _wrong_ attribute you want from someone running a company that produces safety equipment. He also clearly trusts the work -- at this one installation site, not necessarily anywhere else -- which is a positive, but together they kinda cancel each other out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Yeah I would absolutely not take their work simply out of principle at that point.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The worst part is that he was right. The window did not break, he knocked out the entire frame: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Garry_Hoy

3 weeks ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

I couldn't even imagine what the students who were there thought after he fell. Like do we get an A? becasue our instructor jumped out of a window to his death for a demonstration

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know what you have to do, carry on.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think the worst part was when he fell from the 24th floor.

3 weeks ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Or maybe it was when he hit the ground.

3 weeks ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Structural engineer Bob Greer said "I don't know of any building code in the world that would allow a 73 kg (160 lb) man to run up against a glass and withstand it."

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As a practical matter

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After reading the wiki of his death the engineer in me is a wondering if he kept running into the SAME glass window. Just nudging the clips out slowly by a few thousands of an inch until he finally knocked it out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My guess is he was suicidal

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was the impression I had when I read the story WAY back. He had been careful in the beginning, and it built his confidence. That was the SAFE window. That one was repeatedly tested. He KNEW that one was ok to use for his trick.

It's a good lesson for everyone. Just because something was safe before, and YOU haven't changed, doesn't mean that the situation didn't change without you noticing.

That's why drinking and driving is dangerous. Other drivers and road conditions.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not just other drivers, drinking impairs your faculties

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The issue is that people that drive intoxicated know that their reaction time is slower so they are more cautious to make up for it. And it actually does balance out THEIR driving. They think that's enough.

But it's being able to react to everyone else that stops accidents. It's being able to stop when someone runs a light, or runs across the street, or is walking on the side in dark clothes.

That's the part they can't adjust for, and that's what needs to be beaten into their heads.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Horrible way to go but sometimes it’s also wiser to just NOT tempt fate. Just cause you got a bullet proof vest doesn’t mean you should casually test it out on yourself.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Space Shuttle always had a problem with the o-rings in the boosters. Each time that they suffered more damage than they were supposed to, engineers said "huh, I guess more damage is still safe and we don't need to worry about it." And they did that until reality raised its hand.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Horrible way to go about it but I am pretty confident the working solution would have been to install new o rings every time and they said no because of labor cost and time. The most common troupe I seen in aerospace as to why no one implemented a correction or update to maintenance is because it will cause delays and cost more money then what they original quoted.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So money over human life, that’s not cool.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It should be noted that the glass didnt break from him running into it but the window itself popped out.

3 weeks ago | Likes 184 Dislikes 0

He should’ve tried to ride it like a carpet

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Followed moments later by this sound?

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Those things are just held in the stainless steel clips. They are pretty strong, but…

3 weeks ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Only as strong as its weakest part.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If you throw a grown man at the same window a few hundred times...

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

So bad installation

3 weeks ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

They didn't design it to have an adult man throw his full weight in to it multiple times

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The installation was up to code. It simply wasn't designed to have people running into it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He did it multiple times before it finally broke.

3 weeks ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

(Trust like his is why they put warning stickers on hammers.)

3 weeks ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So bad Installation. A good installation will remain good until the hotel itself is in complete disrepair and slated for demolition.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

In what universe do you live where a proper install can override the laws of physics?

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Material fatigue is a thing. It was his favorite stunt to do to "impress" people. You can properly install a door, but if you use a ram on it every day, it will eventually break, it will take longer, but it will break.

3 weeks ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Nope. Guy's name was Garry Hoy and his estate did not even try to sue after being advised they would not have a case and manufacturers would not be held liable. All the defense has to prove is that the product was deliberately used outside the predictable realm of common intended use and responsibility. In contrast, the "Checkov" vs Jeep situation, Jeep was aware of reports of users missing "PARK" in normal use due to bad engineering. They had begun a recall. That claim was settled/awarded.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0