So I heard we were posting pictures of assholes

Sep 6, 2018 1:04 AM

ProcrastinatorPython

Views

133830

Likes

2233

Dislikes

156

FP Edit: Lots in the comments asking who he is, so I figured I'd tell you. This is Martin Shkreli, a former executive at Turing Pharmaceuticals. In 2015, he increased the price of a drug, Daraprim, that treats a rare parasitic infection that occurs in babies and/or AIDS/HIV patients. The price went from $13.50 a pill to $750, a 5500% increase. He was able to do this because the drug was not patent protected, and had no generic competitors, so really he gave the people who desperately needed it no other choice but to buy or die. Granted, the infection is very rare, but it does save lives.

Some have claimed in the comments that the funds were supposedly going towards research to develop new and better drugs. I, personally, have seen no news on this anywhere, only his word. Which, by the way, isn't extremely reliable, as he is currently serving a 7 year sentence for securities fraud, which he was sentenced to earlier this year. Essentially he lied to investors about his other company, Retrophin, that were taking heavy losses, and using assets of that company to pay the investors back.

If you are adamant on defending this gaping, puss-filled asshole, I'd absolutely love some sources for your claims.

Also, send nudes.

If it wasnt patent protected, then it should have been possible for a generic manufacturer to make an alternate supply.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yuck this is the worst one yet...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You can get away making things harder and expensive for the poor, but screw over the rich and it's jail time.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah this guy can go straight to hell.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

On the advice of counsel-I invoke my 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and respectfully decline to comment a differing view

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#freeshrekli

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 11

Well played!

8 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 3

This butthole thing is going too far. I'm reporting this. I shouldn't have to look at this asshole.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

If anyone wants to defend it with the bullshit line of "it was going to help create better drugs", please,let me see the shack execs live in

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Buttholes*

8 years ago | Likes 190 Dislikes 1

Steal $500 from 7-11 go to jail for 5 years, steal millions go to jail for 7 and probably get out early!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, let's keep it SFW

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Asshole is sfw

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why do you have to ruin something beautiful with irrelevant opinions about irrelevant people. He’s just a player in a game. Change the game.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not sure if mad at him or the whole system that allows this and greedy other companies that do the exact same thing but never brought up.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then post one?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/2PCb9mnrU1g Honestly still a douche bag but shows he isn't the only one.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And he has since cried while apologizing a true asshole

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One prolapse I'd like to see

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Heard he hiked it for research funds, but then again I heard that on the internet.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

He claimed it was going towards research, but the drug didn’t need any improvements, and all his company really does is hold drug patents

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hiked and subsidized/gave free to lower income. IMO pry just about as “good-guy pharma” as u can get n that shithole industry..

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That's a weird photo of Ajit Pai

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh I forgot about him

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Is he in jail or what’s up

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My thing is that other companies have been doing what he does for years and no one said a god damned word.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Typical imgur, nailing a guy to the cross with very limited information and mob mentality, morons, all of you.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 17

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

ily2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If everyone here is a moron, what does that make you?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Clearly it's directed towards those judging based on some article they've read, all of them are morons, is that easier to understand? Moron?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I'm pretty comfortable shitting on someone serving 7 years for fraud crime but go ahead, defend him.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm not defending anyone, information provided by OP is just not accurate.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Says: "The information is inaccurate!". Also: Does not correct any so-called inaccuracy.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nor is he giving us any reason we shouldn't be nailing him to a cross

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Typical imgur commentator, called people morons for having "limited information" and not giving any.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

You don't have ''limited information'' you just choose to go with what you have in your OP, so yes, you are a moron.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Best comment is where you ask for non biased sources, yet you base your judgement on barely anything, top man.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I have yet to see anyone claiming the price hike was a positive thing post any unbiased sources supporting their claims.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

And I couldn't find any myself, which leads me to believe I don't have "limited information"; I have the best I can find.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Tell me, who did he charge? You realise not a single patient in need of this drug was to pay this amount right? Where's your sources.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who's this

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Sep 6, 2018 5:17 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That’s not Ben, this dude is Martin Shkreli. He’s the guy that hiked the price for a certain drug or something like that

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Pharma bro.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Prominent Wu Tang Clan enthusiast/collector

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

An asshole...see the title?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

8 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 7

SHAME

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A guy who needs a Ole fashion prison shower ramming

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Upvoting for the reference. One of the best moments in Justice League.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Made AIDS drug expensive af, cause he is AIDS.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I thought he did that with EpiPens

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Pharmabro

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Really

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Martin Shkreli. Guy bought the rights to Daraprim, that treats a rare parasitic infection in babies or HIV/AIDS patient, and increased the

8 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 1

Ah, that jerk

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

price by %5000

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 1

So what Big Phara already does.. got it

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He did what many have done before, to save a failing company, but this is the one that the general public actually started noticing

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He's a scape goat. A sacrifice to conceal the bigger wolves.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do some research on this guy... He's not so bad. There is a great vice doc on him on YouTube. Classic case of limited info and mob mentality

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 24

The last time i suggested something like this i got down voted to hell.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And here we go again!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's terrible, but he had a good point [paraphrasing] "there's nothing legally stopping me from doing this. People do it every day.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I just did it enough to gain media attention and that's why were having this hearing."

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That doc only makes him look good if you actually take what he says at face value. Which you really shouldn’t

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Valeant Pharmaceuticals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Money_(2018_TV_series)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It was the company's way of working. he was so low down the food chain what he did was standard practice for valeant.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Not so bad". 7 years in prison (that's real time, not a light sentence) but you say, "not so bad".

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

He got that for shareholder fraud. Stealing from the rich is wrong but honestly, I'd only consider that a low-medium level bad act.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You know that some of those shares are held my mutual funds which in turn are held by ordinary people. 7 years ain't low-medium ya twat.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Don’t invest what you can’t afford to lose. But yeah.. stealing is bad mkay..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're just doubling down on the stupid without adding anything of value to the thread. Mkay.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I have yet to see, or be shown, a shred of actually independent evidence that exonerates him. If you have any, by all means link, but-

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

-every other time I have asked, I was sent to either his company's website or someone making un-sourced claims. His own word it worthless-

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

-as he is convicted of fraud, which makes me disinclined to trust him.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Oh shit. That's the asshole who made a pill that wasn't patent-protected and gave it away to 60% of the people who needed it. Fuck him.

8 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 45

Don't bother, these people ask for credible sources on your claims yet barely provide any themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Not forgetting he also made a patent protected pill 100% more expensive

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Underrated comment. People saw his stuff in front of congress (sorry if incorrect and think he is a jerk but if you look into at all you 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 17

Will see that he actually isn’t a bad guy. Wouldn’t go so far as to say a good guy, but definitely not a butthole

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 13

Buuuuut he's in jail for a white collar crime. Do you know how baaaaad you have to be to actually go to jail for white collar crimes in US.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I thought his congressional testimony was hilarious tbh. Looked like no one up there had any idea what to think/do in that situation lol

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Look into his discussion about monkeys

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He didn't make it. He bought the rights to the company that produced it and hiked the price up 5000x because there were no other competitors

8 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 7

Manufactured. Produced. And nobody died. It was out of stock. Discontinued. He revived it. Fake news outrage. Poor some effort into looking

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 17

Into it beyond "my politics is right. Com"

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

So google.com isn't reliable I guess.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Wellll, technically it is not. Especially because companies can buy higher places on a search.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

1| “We sell our drugs for a dollar to the government, but we sell our drugs for $750 a pill to Walmart, to Exxon Mobil, to all these big...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

2| companies, they pay full price because fuck them, why shouldn’t they? If I take their money to do research for dying kids, I think I’m

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3| “.a hero, let alone evil.” “love to make an even bigger fortune than I’ve got now but Im not gonna do it at the expense of a human life.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He is also currently sentenced to 7 years in prison for wire fraud. So yeah, fuck him.

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 10

Yeah fuck him for charging insurance companies more but people who can't afford it get it for free. Fuck him for using the additional money

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

to replace this deadly half decade old drug. You are Media controlled ♂️

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Deadly in what way? If it's deadly why would people be buying it? Why have I not seen any positive things said about this hike until now?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Alright OP.. 1) He raised the price because only a handful of people were taking it. Development costs were barely profitable apparently.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

2) His primary job as CEO, along with overseeing the killing of animals, is to make money for the shareholders and the company

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

He is currently in jail for defrauding investors of his other company, Retrophin, so sorry if I don't actually trust him to make them money.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Wasn’t trying to imply that he was a shining example of morality. I’m aware he is jail. Fraud was to make money, same with price hike

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just my belief that he wouldn’t put someones life/health in jeopardy for it. I don’t think it’s as black and white as everyone thinks is all

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3) By becoming more profitable they would have had more money to put into R&D to create better, safer and cheaper drugs in the future.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

4) Insurance were the only ones paying for the increase. If the gov didn’t provide it to low income Turing offered to give it away for free

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Literally just his word. I have seen no evidence of these claims, so refuting it is pointless.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They offered mail in vouchers or somethin of the sort if no insurance or gov assist covering it. They never needed tho, which was his point.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a rare disease, so saying that a handful of people needed it is redundant. And the profits are decreasing even for his former company

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Well they are both interchangeable as far as dev costs. Barely enough people took it to even warrant spending the production time/labor

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The company’s revenue, largely driven by Daraprim sales, fell nearly 15 percent between 2016 and 2017, from $78.5 million to $67 million."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Happens all the time in pharma I’m sure.. https://www.businessinsider.com/a-compound-pharma-company-is-making-a-daraprim-killer-2015-10

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But instead of just losing their investment entirely they had a few years profit bc of the increase. Also bad PR/loss of CEO doesn’t help

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This just proves how unnecessary it is to make the price of a single pill be $750, even if it was just to fuck over insurance companies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I legitimately implore anyone who wants to defend this scumbag to give me any unbiased sources supporting the claims that:

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

2. The funds go towards developing a "safer alternative"

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

https://www.vyera.com/news/ roughly 1 month ago they started a phase 1 study on the safer alternative. I think you own everybody an apology.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Accusations should be brought with evidence, not defense.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Where are my accusations? Everything I have said is fact, and I've cited many sources in other conversations.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Every claim should have some kind of proof to back it up, regardless of side. I have yet to see any proof for the other side of things.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1. Patients don't pay anything more than $13.50 out of pocket

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

The company released a statement AND the article lists ways how the drug is available for free as well.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Insurance paying more ultimately results in the public paying more! 2 ways - Medicaid (from taxes) and personal premiums

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not sure about the US, but in Brazil: Daraprim 25mg, 30 pills, retail price: R$2,25 ($0.019 / pill). Source? Any drugstore. Example:

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

https://www.bifarma.com.br/produto/daraprim-25mg-com-30-comp">imidos">https://www.bifarma.com.br/produto/daraprim-25mg-com-30-comprimidos + https://www.farma22.com.br/daraprim-30-comprimidos/p?idsku=480566767

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

American government passes laws to protect the less fortunate and corporations seek to subvert or avoid those laws.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It's a much more complicated conversation than "it's a free country, he can do what he want"

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yes

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes that is the fucking problem

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:37 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Still a dick move even if it is legal.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why were the only producers of it only charging $13.50 then? If that's the business, surely they too would have taken advantage of that

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Oh wait, no, they're not cunts.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 8, 2022 12:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

3. That he did this out of the kindness of his own heart and not because he wanted to make a quick buck

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:33 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 7, 2022 9:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 8, 2022 12:26 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Did you get this upset when other companies did the same thing or did you just hop on the bandwagon to target this one, small fry?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Again, just because other companies have done it doesnt mean he gets a pass.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Understood, but it pisses a lot of us off when you guys decide to jump on the bandwagon but only target like 5% of the actual problem.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He is only a small fucking fraction of the issue.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0