I saw some spray bottles. PLEASE do NOT let little kids handle agricultural chemicals!!! The LD50s are calculated using an average North American man model. Which in turn assumes a full size and fully functional liver and kidneys. Kids can get sick on much lower doses. And in the case of the kidneys, accumulate long term damage.
I’m assuming this is a repost and OP isn’t the parent. My guess is the parents aren’t gardeners and have gone to a garden centre and just picked up stuff they thought they needed. You shouldn’t use any chemicals on a wild garden. Wild flowers like nutrition poor soil so don’t need fertilisers and normally it’s done to encourage wildlife so you certainly don’t use insecticides
Or this: https://www.certisbio.com/products/herbicides/homeplate Caprylic and capric acids. I've only seen it in 2.5gal containers. It DOES have a hefty up-front cost, about $225 shipped for 2.5 gallons, but it dilutes way better than any citric acid/clove oil/d-limonene ones I've seen: 3%-9% dilution rate, so at 6%, 2.5gal can make over 40 gallons of solution, so around $5.50/gallon. These are all classed as "burn-down herbicides," but I would class them as "weed suppressants," since they only
affect the leaves they touch. But especially against annual weed seedlings, they can still be effective. Some perennial weeds can also be killed off with a few applications, until they finally exhaust their underground reserves. (And some invasive weeds have SO MUCH underground biomass that even glyphosate can't manage to kill the whole plant.)
Probably 20 years ago now I found one of those DVDs that had two movies, one on each side...combo of The Secret Garden and A Little Princess. Big chunk of my childhood right there (yes, I still have it ❤️)
This is adorable, and definitely some good parenting. However, I am always a bit of two minds about content like this. A part of me feels it's cute, but another part of me feels like we really shouldn't be normalizing posting videos and pictures of kids up on the Interwebs for the untold masses to see. Or maybe I'm just an old fart still living in the Before Times, I dunno. More likely, it's 3 in the morning and my brain is not braining properly.
Definitely, I'm very glad my parents were wary about that sort of thing, I really wouldnt want to deal with that sort of shit. Especially not with AI facial faking.
These aren't op's kids but I agree, sharing your kid's face online isn't safe. I'm not from the before times, I've had adults asking me to send pics online since I was 9, people are making it too easy for predators these days. This is very far from the worst however, parents are profiting off sharing their kids online now.
Them not being OP's kids kinda makes the point. This has spread far beyond the control of the original poster/parent of that child, and these images will be on the internet basically forever, no matter the child's wishes in the future.
The spray bottle of roundup makes me think this whole thing is bullshit. I feel I don't gotta explain to people why you should NOT be giving that to a child.
Yeah, as a professional child photographer, I struggle with this, among other ethical questions like whether it makes me a bad person to sneak into a public school. The faculty seems pretty convinced, but I'm not so sure
If anything, you should feel scandalized about the sharing of adults' faces, because they remain recognizable for decades, if not a lifetime. Whereas pictures of children expire quickly: a kid's face becomes unrecognizable after just three or four years.
No, you are correct. You should not post your private life on the internet, and you should definitely not share images of your kids. That's just common sense, too many weirdos out there. At least censor their faces, and make sure not to share anything that might doxx yourself by accident.
You're living in the modern times. People used to be scared about kidnappers finding your home and kids, but now tech companies have scraped the Internet from everything anyone has ever posted there, so all the kid pics are in ai generators for pedophiles to use. And older kids can make fake ai "revenge-porn" with anyone's face, so it's even more dangerous than ever to post pics or videos of your kids - or yourself - online.
both but if your going to make a post sanitize your location and and scrub all identifying information, including blurring/cover faces (digitally) in the reality that we live in now.
You’re certainly not wrong. On the one hand you have a proud papa showing off his daughter’s interest, and on the other you have that horrible situation with Ruby Franke. And honestly, I don’t know what the answer is.
We have a roleplay community where we take internet safety very seriously, everyone is given a little course about keeping their PII to themselves, and if they decide to share it anyway, they are going to be heavily discouraged but we can’t force them (it’s on Discord). People usually leave out their faces or censor them when showing pictures they took. Unfortunately many people in the world don’t know about the kind of crazies that lurk on the internet so they dont think to be careful.
No, you definitely have a valid point. This kid has no idea mom and dad are putting her online and that's messed up. So many nutjobs out there who could become obsessed with her and think they have some sort of entitlement to her and the UK really isn't that big if you're trying to find someone. Especially when there's so much info about them online. This shouldn't be the norm. Protect your kids' privacy!
barbarian818
I saw some spray bottles. PLEASE do NOT let little kids handle agricultural chemicals!!! The LD50s are calculated using an average North American man model. Which in turn assumes a full size and fully functional liver and kidneys. Kids can get sick on much lower doses. And in the case of the kidneys, accumulate long term damage.
GerardEngelage
A hobby for life!
Cosmicfisherman
Joy is always a good thing. Grow On!!!
JaTheRed
Aww, kids and dogs keep this world afloat I tell ya
urcunce
The smile on that kids face says it all. Huge win in my book.
SirDalud
Absolutely cute and adorable! Br little daughters dad
LucilleWhoKnowsNot
My daughter decided to start gardening at 4. She made her big brother help her. It was all hers and she loved it.
stonecoldstevebuschemi
zbeta
This is so heart warming.
onponmon
W scenario
Diablito69
Looks perfect to me. Great parenting.
Centroid
That’s wonderful, but I wouldn’t let my toddler play with roundup.
kitterskills
Came here to say this. Omg. What are you thinking. Roundup causes cancer.
Hal1918
Bit of Google showed there seem to be Roundup variants without glyphosate but resolution is too poor to read if this is one
hurdygurdybernieman
I had the same thought. Love the kid getting exposed to gardening, but would not let my kids near that stuff.
dundeeisdrunk
I’m assuming this is a repost and OP isn’t the parent. My guess is the parents aren’t gardeners and have gone to a garden centre and just picked up stuff they thought they needed. You shouldn’t use any chemicals on a wild garden. Wild flowers like nutrition poor soil so don’t need fertilisers and normally it’s done to encourage wildlife so you certainly don’t use insecticides
SomebodyalreadytookMyPants
Exposure to it has literally been linked to Parkinson's. Use vinegar or one of the citric acid clove oil ones.
The701
Or this: https://www.certisbio.com/products/herbicides/homeplate Caprylic and capric acids. I've only seen it in 2.5gal containers. It DOES have a hefty up-front cost, about $225 shipped for 2.5 gallons, but it dilutes way better than any citric acid/clove oil/d-limonene ones I've seen: 3%-9% dilution rate, so at 6%, 2.5gal can make over 40 gallons of solution, so around $5.50/gallon. These are all classed as "burn-down herbicides," but I would class them as "weed suppressants," since they only
The701
affect the leaves they touch. But especially against annual weed seedlings, they can still be effective. Some perennial weeds can also be killed off with a few applications, until they finally exhaust their underground reserves. (And some invasive weeds have SO MUCH underground biomass that even glyphosate can't manage to kill the whole plant.)
VaxxedCanadian
That 2yr old has a lot of money
DiscoveredByTheGermansIn1904
It IS perfect: it’s messy and wild
HandsomePenguin
Oh yeah, monetize that child. Get paid!
Thesaya
I would say that it is perfect at is, too structured gardens are boring
FlipTheBirdBeforeTheBirdFlipsYou
And not that great for pollinators and others insects
dymsea2
She is a total star! Congratulations on your lovely gardener.
kerrigan778
Yay, grass lawn and exposing your kid to roundup and the internet...
therandombagofmeat
oldvydeo
Needs this:
Malinut
OMG! New class of entry for Chelsea! Toddler Built Gardens!
feetabee24
I respectfully disagree....it is perfect...perfectly her.
pdonettes
I planted fairies. None of them grew, and fairy seeds are impossible to find.
bekindtoanimals
Core memory
TalkingSnake
That is a kid who needs The Secret Garden read to her.
Nettesheim
That was my favourite book as a little one! I highly recommend it!
Omnislash9
Probably 20 years ago now I found one of those DVDs that had two movies, one on each side...combo of The Secret Garden and A Little Princess. Big chunk of my childhood right there (yes, I still have it ❤️)
Sticklebrickk
As a full grown man, YES!
elevengoldfish
I have that dvd!
Omnislash9
What a great find, right?!
elevengoldfish
Total score! Two of my favorite movies growing up. A Little Princess still guts me when, at the end, she is being torn away from her father and he can't remember her and she's screaming, "Papa!" And then! In the last moment, "Sarah!" So good. https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1aG1uZWY1NDltemJjNjM5YzBqOGNqbHhsb3d6YjY0dmY5MDM3eXI1ZyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/bv62zBZv7ZPAk/200w.webp
Omnislash9
Ugh just reading your comment has me tearing up lol
torbengb
Who doesn't pull the price tags off of wind wheels??!?! Lunacy.
FellaWithUmbrella
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/24/us/bayer-monsanto-to-pay-2-billion-roundup
”A jury in Georgia has ordered Monsanto parent Bayer to pay nearly $2.1 billion in damages to a man who says the company’s Roundup weed killer caused his cancer, according to attorneys representing the plaintiff.”
colinstu
roundup these days has been totally reformulated and isn't the killer stuff it was before.
FellaWithUmbrella
BavarianGuy
As a German, the lack of geometric lines, clear borders between different kinds of plants, and a layered appoach to bloom times is disturbing.
dadof2as
My daughter was a messy and wild type, so cute
beemarr
This is adorable, and definitely some good parenting. However, I am always a bit of two minds about content like this. A part of me feels it's cute, but another part of me feels like we really shouldn't be normalizing posting videos and pictures of kids up on the Interwebs for the untold masses to see. Or maybe I'm just an old fart still living in the Before Times, I dunno. More likely, it's 3 in the morning and my brain is not braining properly.
Eatabaggadix
Whats the downside of posting a vid like this?
Ivain
Definitely, I'm very glad my parents were wary about that sort of thing, I really wouldnt want to deal with that sort of shit. Especially not with AI facial faking.
panta3
These aren't op's kids but I agree, sharing your kid's face online isn't safe. I'm not from the before times, I've had adults asking me to send pics online since I was 9, people are making it too easy for predators these days.
This is very far from the worst however, parents are profiting off sharing their kids online now.
FractalB
Them not being OP's kids kinda makes the point. This has spread far beyond the control of the original poster/parent of that child, and these images will be on the internet basically forever, no matter the child's wishes in the future.
mikeatike
The spray bottle of roundup makes me think this whole thing is bullshit. I feel I don't gotta explain to people why you should NOT be giving that to a child.
IclaimRandomJobs
Yeah, as a professional child photographer, I struggle with this, among other ethical questions like whether it makes me a bad person to sneak into a public school. The faculty seems pretty convinced, but I'm not so sure
502781
If anything, you should feel scandalized about the sharing of adults' faces, because they remain recognizable for decades, if not a lifetime. Whereas pictures of children expire quickly: a kid's face becomes unrecognizable after just three or four years.
FractalB
No, you are correct. You should not post your private life on the internet, and you should definitely not share images of your kids. That's just common sense, too many weirdos out there. At least censor their faces, and make sure not to share anything that might doxx yourself by accident.
MaleProstateMilker88
You're living in the modern times. People used to be scared about kidnappers finding your home and kids, but now tech companies have scraped the Internet from everything anyone has ever posted there, so all the kid pics are in ai generators for pedophiles to use. And older kids can make fake ai "revenge-porn" with anyone's face, so it's even more dangerous than ever to post pics or videos of your kids - or yourself - online.
rusrsdude
Maybe viewers should report the posters for whatever reason they may find to reduce the amount of shares it gets.
Yawnos
both but if your going to make a post sanitize your location and and scrub all identifying information, including blurring/cover faces (digitally) in the reality that we live in now.
theresaschu713
Agree completely.
joshuasplinth
You’re certainly not wrong. On the one hand you have a proud papa showing off his daughter’s interest, and on the other you have that horrible situation with Ruby Franke. And honestly, I don’t know what the answer is.
CanOnlySayYes
We have a roleplay community where we take internet safety very seriously, everyone is given a little course about keeping their PII to themselves, and if they decide to share it anyway, they are going to be heavily discouraged but we can’t force them (it’s on Discord). People usually leave out their faces or censor them when showing pictures they took. Unfortunately many people in the world don’t know about the kind of crazies that lurk on the internet so they dont think to be careful.
joshuasplinth
I guess that’s the thing - the KNOWN dangers are bad enough, the unknown unknowns are… yuck.
theinternetkeepsmealive
No, you definitely have a valid point. This kid has no idea mom and dad are putting her online and that's messed up. So many nutjobs out there who could become obsessed with her and think they have some sort of entitlement to her and the UK really isn't that big if you're trying to find someone. Especially when there's so much info about them online. This shouldn't be the norm. Protect your kids' privacy!