This kid is growing places ...

Jul 4, 2025 7:12 PM

Herebychoice

Views

63881

Likes

2109

Dislikes

22

Messy and Wild describes most kids ....

I saw some spray bottles. PLEASE do NOT let little kids handle agricultural chemicals!!! The LD50s are calculated using an average North American man model. Which in turn assumes a full size and fully functional liver and kidneys. Kids can get sick on much lower doses. And in the case of the kidneys, accumulate long term damage.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

A hobby for life!

1 year ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Joy is always a good thing. Grow On!!!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aww, kids and dogs keep this world afloat I tell ya

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The smile on that kids face says it all. Huge win in my book.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Absolutely cute and adorable! Br little daughters dad

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My daughter decided to start gardening at 4. She made her big brother help her. It was all hers and she loved it.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is so heart warming.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

W scenario

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks perfect to me. Great parenting.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s wonderful, but I wouldn’t let my toddler play with roundup.

1 year ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 2

Came here to say this. Omg. What are you thinking. Roundup causes cancer.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bit of Google showed there seem to be Roundup variants without glyphosate but resolution is too poor to read if this is one

1 year ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

I had the same thought. Love the kid getting exposed to gardening, but would not let my kids near that stuff.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I’m assuming this is a repost and OP isn’t the parent. My guess is the parents aren’t gardeners and have gone to a garden centre and just picked up stuff they thought they needed. You shouldn’t use any chemicals on a wild garden. Wild flowers like nutrition poor soil so don’t need fertilisers and normally it’s done to encourage wildlife so you certainly don’t use insecticides

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Exposure to it has literally been linked to Parkinson's. Use vinegar or one of the citric acid clove oil ones.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or this: https://www.certisbio.com/products/herbicides/homeplate Caprylic and capric acids. I've only seen it in 2.5gal containers. It DOES have a hefty up-front cost, about $225 shipped for 2.5 gallons, but it dilutes way better than any citric acid/clove oil/d-limonene ones I've seen: 3%-9% dilution rate, so at 6%, 2.5gal can make over 40 gallons of solution, so around $5.50/gallon. These are all classed as "burn-down herbicides," but I would class them as "weed suppressants," since they only

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

affect the leaves they touch. But especially against annual weed seedlings, they can still be effective. Some perennial weeds can also be killed off with a few applications, until they finally exhaust their underground reserves. (And some invasive weeds have SO MUCH underground biomass that even glyphosate can't manage to kill the whole plant.)

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That 2yr old has a lot of money

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It IS perfect: it’s messy and wild

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah, monetize that child. Get paid!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I would say that it is perfect at is, too structured gardens are boring

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And not that great for pollinators and others insects

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She is a total star! Congratulations on your lovely gardener.

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Yay, grass lawn and exposing your kid to roundup and the internet...

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Needs this:

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

OMG! New class of entry for Chelsea! Toddler Built Gardens!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I respectfully disagree....it is perfect...perfectly her.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I planted fairies. None of them grew, and fairy seeds are impossible to find.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Core memory

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is a kid who needs The Secret Garden read to her.

1 year ago | Likes 446 Dislikes 1

That was my favourite book as a little one! I highly recommend it!

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Probably 20 years ago now I found one of those DVDs that had two movies, one on each side...combo of The Secret Garden and A Little Princess. Big chunk of my childhood right there (yes, I still have it ❤️)

1 year ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

As a full grown man, YES!

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I have that dvd!

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What a great find, right?!

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Total score! Two of my favorite movies growing up. A Little Princess still guts me when, at the end, she is being torn away from her father and he can't remember her and she's screaming, "Papa!" And then! In the last moment, "Sarah!" So good. https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1aG1uZWY1NDltemJjNjM5YzBqOGNqbHhsb3d6YjY0dmY5MDM3eXI1ZyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/bv62zBZv7ZPAk/200w.webp

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ugh just reading your comment has me tearing up lol

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who doesn't pull the price tags off of wind wheels??!?! Lunacy.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/24/us/bayer-monsanto-to-pay-2-billion-roundup
”A jury in Georgia has ordered Monsanto parent Bayer to pay nearly $2.1 billion in damages to a man who says the company’s Roundup weed killer caused his cancer, according to attorneys representing the plaintiff.”

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

roundup these days has been totally reformulated and isn't the killer stuff it was before.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

As a German, the lack of geometric lines, clear borders between different kinds of plants, and a layered appoach to bloom times is disturbing.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My daughter was a messy and wild type, so cute

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is adorable, and definitely some good parenting. However, I am always a bit of two minds about content like this. A part of me feels it's cute, but another part of me feels like we really shouldn't be normalizing posting videos and pictures of kids up on the Interwebs for the untold masses to see. Or maybe I'm just an old fart still living in the Before Times, I dunno. More likely, it's 3 in the morning and my brain is not braining properly.

1 year ago | Likes 338 Dislikes 14

Whats the downside of posting a vid like this?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Definitely, I'm very glad my parents were wary about that sort of thing, I really wouldnt want to deal with that sort of shit. Especially not with AI facial faking.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These aren't op's kids but I agree, sharing your kid's face online isn't safe. I'm not from the before times, I've had adults asking me to send pics online since I was 9, people are making it too easy for predators these days.
This is very far from the worst however, parents are profiting off sharing their kids online now.

1 year ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 1

Them not being OP's kids kinda makes the point. This has spread far beyond the control of the original poster/parent of that child, and these images will be on the internet basically forever, no matter the child's wishes in the future.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The spray bottle of roundup makes me think this whole thing is bullshit. I feel I don't gotta explain to people why you should NOT be giving that to a child.

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Yeah, as a professional child photographer, I struggle with this, among other ethical questions like whether it makes me a bad person to sneak into a public school. The faculty seems pretty convinced, but I'm not so sure

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If anything, you should feel scandalized about the sharing of adults' faces, because they remain recognizable for decades, if not a lifetime. Whereas pictures of children expire quickly: a kid's face becomes unrecognizable after just three or four years.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, you are correct. You should not post your private life on the internet, and you should definitely not share images of your kids. That's just common sense, too many weirdos out there. At least censor their faces, and make sure not to share anything that might doxx yourself by accident.

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

You're living in the modern times. People used to be scared about kidnappers finding your home and kids, but now tech companies have scraped the Internet from everything anyone has ever posted there, so all the kid pics are in ai generators for pedophiles to use. And older kids can make fake ai "revenge-porn" with anyone's face, so it's even more dangerous than ever to post pics or videos of your kids - or yourself - online.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe viewers should report the posters for whatever reason they may find to reduce the amount of shares it gets.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

both but if your going to make a post sanitize your location and and scrub all identifying information, including blurring/cover faces (digitally) in the reality that we live in now.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Agree completely.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You’re certainly not wrong. On the one hand you have a proud papa showing off his daughter’s interest, and on the other you have that horrible situation with Ruby Franke. And honestly, I don’t know what the answer is.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We have a roleplay community where we take internet safety very seriously, everyone is given a little course about keeping their PII to themselves, and if they decide to share it anyway, they are going to be heavily discouraged but we can’t force them (it’s on Discord). People usually leave out their faces or censor them when showing pictures they took. Unfortunately many people in the world don’t know about the kind of crazies that lurk on the internet so they dont think to be careful.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I guess that’s the thing - the KNOWN dangers are bad enough, the unknown unknowns are… yuck.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, you definitely have a valid point. This kid has no idea mom and dad are putting her online and that's messed up. So many nutjobs out there who could become obsessed with her and think they have some sort of entitlement to her and the UK really isn't that big if you're trying to find someone. Especially when there's so much info about them online. This shouldn't be the norm. Protect your kids' privacy!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0