Since 1948 the US has been sending billions to Israel. In return they agree to use half of the money to buy weapons from the US. History is interesting but depressing.
good response, Palestine sure has a right to exist. Israel has a right to an international ethics intervention where every genocide-mongering tyrant is murdered in the streets and their constituents may choose sides at that monent as they see fit. anything else is incommensurate justice
Remove the malignant tumors growing in the west bank aja "settlers" and Israeli politics actually is somewhat sane. The Zionist militant settlers who have a genuine hate for Palestinians need to be prosecuted alongside the Israeli regime.
Yes they have the right to our tax money. Years and years of incompetent spending rulers maybe bought by that money or epsteins, brought that Will. Btw that same politicians are gonna save us from that!!! 🤣
I was always told, "your rights end where someone else's rights begin" if they assert their right to exist, that means naturally Palestine also has a right to exist, but world leaders don't like talking about that one so much.
In fact isreal does not have the right to exist, at least not like this and not there. The entire world got a grave disservice to everyone by "saying sorry for holocaust" in this way, forming a mutated country in the very wrong area and moving people from all sides of the world to suddenly live there.
Israel doesn't have a right to exist. No nation-state has a right to exist, because nation-states don't have rights. Rights are for humans, and nation-states that do not serve or protect the rights of humans ought to be dismantled and replaced by more functional institutions.
Imagine if China dropped 35 million dollars on trying to influence an election in the US. These people would be shitting enough bricks to build a skyscraper. But when AIPAC does it, it's totally cool, as seen in the recent Michigan primary.
They haven't been vacuuming shit, the industrial military complex has made sure the money flows freely so they can skim off the top from all the "we fail every audit lmao" defense spending.
Look up something called the Khartoum Resolution. Though, ironically enough, it's being abandoned by the Arab nations... to the point that, even as "antizionists" openly scream hatred of Jews, the Arab countries that once declared they would never recognize, negotiate with, or make peace with Israel, are now beginning to see Israel as a major ally.
Probably because Israel has ben defending them from IRGC rockets.
Only in the same universe that expanding freedoms to minorities risks freedom to cis white men (and since I am a cis white man I can honestly tell you I don't feel the least bit threatened)
Not as a fascist, theocratic ethno state. You want to give everyone equal rights and stop murdering and destabilizing your neighbors, then we can talk.
I'd be willing to bet that, after some reparations and trials of war criminals, almost every government in the region would be willing to coexist peacefully.
There are extremists in all countries. The problem is when they get into power like the Israeli regime and their malignant settler program. Heinous. Hamas too but that was a drop in the bucket compared to the tidal wave of atrocities Israel has committed. The extremists will still terrorize but the countries must show restraint.
Hamas is a group of orphans who's families were murdered by the IDF. I'm willing to bet that most of them will be helpful in reconstruction after the trials and reparations. Barring the extremists, you already mentions, of course. Some people are just too far gone.
Extremist actions breads extremist reactions... leading to more extremes and the death of political life and change, irony these extremists would want a form of status que like Orwell's 1984 so that they can Clinge to power and control the society, inciting one group on the other
But that's what they wanted him to say. The goal is to trap him. If he says no, they say he is a radical extremist. Supporting Israel may have been what cost Harris the election, so they also know he can't say yes. They have a question with two wrong answers, and they are hoping to back him into a corner and make him say one of them. Unfortunately for them, he does than they are, and better at avoiding traps than they are at making them.
No state exists by right. The question is a rhetorical trick. Kinda like the old “So when did you quit beating your wife?” Any attempt to answer the question immediately traps you. Reject the premise outright.
If the Israeli people have a right to exist and a state is merely an extension of the people, then the Israeli state has a right to exist. I agree this is a gotcha to try and trap El-Sayd but the question alone can be answered.
I believe therein lies the misunderstanding. A state is NOT merely an extension of the people. You might be thinking of a nation, but a state is not a nation. A state is a power structure, made for the securing of power/sovereignty over a region. You can have one without the other, easily, and often do. Examples: the Turkish people existed long before the state of Turkey came to be. The state of apartheid South Africa ceased to be, yet that did not end South Africans. No state exists by right.
I think you're being pretty loose here. Aparthied South Africa wasn't a distinctly differnt state than South Africa. It was South Africa performing apartheid. Just the same as there was no Slaver United States. There was a United States that performed slavery.
Nation and State are often synonymous, state merely requires there to be land borders but you still need the people to exist within those borders hence why a state has to be an extension of its people. No people. No state.
No country has the right to exist. People have rights. Countries are made up. Borders and regimes change all the time. Did Yugoslavia have the right to exist?
There is an epidemic of ignorance in the world. 🤷 Every luxury, security, or freedom we have is due to our cooperation with others. Rights are determined at every level of governance for our allies and our enemies. Slaves had no rights, until we decided they should. Countries have only the rights afforded them by the other nations of the world. Why is the Russian invasion condemned and the Israeli invasion promoted. Ultimately it comes down to “us vs. them” and “might makes right,” or… “rights.”
If the people willed it, absolutely. Marx and Engles were merely repeating the mantra of Confucian and Daoist philosophers when they said that a state exists as an arm and extension of its people. If people have a right to exist, then a state will form around those people.
That's a different question. You're speaking of self-determination, which is not reliant on the creation of a state. Countries are a fairly new concept. They are not inevitable.
No, you're moving the goal posts. If the people will a state to exist, inevitable or not, then the state has a right to exist because the people will it. The reality remains that the state has a right to exist pursuit the will of the people.
So does every group of people get their own state in the same area? Did the jewish Europeans have a right to genocide the Palestinians living there to remove their state and replace it with their own state by force? Do the Christians living in Israel get to create their own state inside (on top of?) Israel now? Are they also allowed to genocide the jewish and Palestinian people to create their christian ethnostate? I can keep going if you want me to poke more holes into your argument
We point fingers at Israel as they were the last and most recent imperial invader supportee by Britain and the US and others at the time. But most countries were imperialist invaders at some point. Si Israel can exist. It cannot genocide Palestine and keep letting settlers do heinous crimes. It should be given the same harsh penalties as Russia instead of tax dollars Americans and more bombs
Israel was only founded in living memory, comparing that to countries who founded themselves in blood generations ago is ridiculous. Every israeli IDF soldier today has blood on their hands from their own actions for helping along the ongoing genocide and the realisation of establishing Israel, and working to make the Greater Israel project a reality.
We point fingers at Israel for being an invading force sanctioned by a lot of western nations. It has no legitimate claim, never has. They aren't imperialist invaders "at some point", they are still the same genocidal maniacs they've always been
SilverFoxChaser
No
Whoisthisdoctorwho2000
The major difference is that Palestinenhas the right to self defense, Israel does not.
Orionsdick
Individuals have rights, countries don't
HolyFreakingToast
the never again gang is doing it again. this time from the river to the sea.
YippeeKayakOB
If that means genocide, then no. https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1NTE3dXU0bDY5YnZ2Y2dnbGQ1bTltZTFuc2Z4cjFuMXBlaW9hZWQweiZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/c5FhF1waAJ5wk/200w.webp
brownribbon
No country has a right to exist, including Israel. Including the US.
Hootykai
Since 1948 the US has been sending billions to Israel. In return they agree to use half of the money to buy weapons from the US. History is interesting but depressing.
rumandbass
I mean how many modern countries have a right to exist? So much stolen land.
FreeRangeToast
good response, Palestine sure has a right to exist. Israel has a right to an international ethics intervention where every genocide-mongering tyrant is murdered in the streets and their constituents may choose sides at that monent as they see fit. anything else is incommensurate justice
GimcrackGewgaw
States don't have rights.
TheGreyGryphon
Remove the malignant tumors growing in the west bank aja "settlers" and Israeli politics actually is somewhat sane. The Zionist militant settlers who have a genuine hate for Palestinians need to be prosecuted alongside the Israeli regime.
philomemo9000
Yes they have the right to our tax money. Years and years of incompetent spending rulers maybe bought by that money or epsteins, brought that Will.
Btw that same politicians are gonna save us from that!!! 🤣
PackratMagpie
Evi1Gav
"does the made up country that the UK and USA decided would be made up by stealing Palestinian land, deserve to exist?"
SquashDemon
I was always told, "your rights end where someone else's rights begin" if they assert their right to exist, that means naturally Palestine also has a right to exist, but world leaders don't like talking about that one so much.
CorgisButtsDriveMeNuts
In fact isreal does not have the right to exist, at least not like this and not there.
The entire world got a grave disservice to everyone by "saying sorry for holocaust" in this way, forming a mutated country in the very wrong area and moving people from all sides of the world to suddenly live there.
seenunseen
Boom
HonestCommentFarmer
There are a million better questions than "does Israel have a right to exist?"
18booma
Not if you're trying to defend the apartheid state. It's not like they can ask him "How can Israel wipe out the Palestinians faster?"
slamorama
Israel doesn't have a right to exist. No nation-state has a right to exist, because nation-states don't have rights. Rights are for humans, and nation-states that do not serve or protect the rights of humans ought to be dismantled and replaced by more functional institutions.
SlavaUkrainisaysSteveBuscemi
Sebastopol140
He's right you know.
AvsFreak
Spiderbubble
Your tax dollars go to Israel so they can influence our elections to fund Israel.
Daliena06
Imagine if China dropped 35 million dollars on trying to influence an election in the US. These people would be shitting enough bricks to build a skyscraper. But when AIPAC does it, it's totally cool, as seen in the recent Michigan primary.
SpottedDickSandwich
"does israel have the right to our tax [fiat currency]?" No, they do not. They have been vacuuming insane amounts of money for years.
neithermenoryou
They haven't been vacuuming shit, the industrial military complex has made sure the money flows freely so they can skim off the top from all the "we fail every audit lmao" defense spending.
SpottedDickSandwich
Most of Europe is paying them as if OUR lives depended on it.
presentingmedia
And bribing our politicians with our tax dollars
OnyxTurret
Is Israel at risk of not existing?
ArkoneAxon
Look up something called the Khartoum Resolution. Though, ironically enough, it's being abandoned by the Arab nations... to the point that, even as "antizionists" openly scream hatred of Jews, the Arab countries that once declared they would never recognize, negotiate with, or make peace with Israel, are now beginning to see Israel as a major ally.
Probably because Israel has ben defending them from IRGC rockets.
HarryDresdenIsMySpiritAnimal
Only in the same universe that expanding freedoms to minorities risks freedom to cis white men (and since I am a cis white man I can honestly tell you I don't feel the least bit threatened)
Superchief86
Israel isn't defending itself. They are the aggressors.
lordfancypantz
Added context:
Palestine's right to exist is discussed extensively by governments and international organisations.
International Court of Justice has explicitly said the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination.
Most countries has acknowledged Palestine as a state (about 150 of UNs 197), though not yet a UN member however.
Leaps
I am sure the tens of thousands of murdered children appreciate that those countries wrote it down in a strongly worded memo.
Nathanyel
Certain other countries:
CyberHexx
Not as a fascist, theocratic ethno state. You want to give everyone equal rights and stop murdering and destabilizing your neighbors, then we can talk.
TheGreyGryphon
Yeah their government is aparteid. They use their historical injustices against their predominant religion as a cowardly defense.
CyberHexx
I'd be willing to bet that, after some reparations and trials of war criminals, almost every government in the region would be willing to coexist peacefully.
TheGreyGryphon
There are extremists in all countries. The problem is when they get into power like the Israeli regime and their malignant settler program. Heinous. Hamas too but that was a drop in the bucket compared to the tidal wave of atrocities Israel has committed. The extremists will still terrorize but the countries must show restraint.
CyberHexx
Hamas is a group of orphans who's families were murdered by the IDF. I'm willing to bet that most of them will be helpful in reconstruction after the trials and reparations. Barring the extremists, you already mentions, of course. Some people are just too far gone.
HummingBirrb
Extremist actions breads extremist reactions... leading to more extremes and the death of political life and change, irony these extremists would want a form of status que like Orwell's 1984 so that they can Clinge to power and control the society, inciting one group on the other
TheImgurWarsMadeMe
"No" is also an answer.
FacelessAce
But that's what they wanted him to say. The goal is to trap him. If he says no, they say he is a radical extremist. Supporting Israel may have been what cost Harris the election, so they also know he can't say yes. They have a question with two wrong answers, and they are hoping to back him into a corner and make him say one of them. Unfortunately for them, he does than they are, and better at avoiding traps than they are at making them.
FacelessAce
*Unfortunately for him, he is smarter than they are, and better at...
Snuggetchamp
Israel absolutely has a right to exist. It doesn't have a right to exist at the expense of others.
brownribbon
No it doesn’t.
JustSomePersonThere
No state exists by right. The question is a rhetorical trick. Kinda like the old “So when did you quit beating your wife?” Any attempt to answer the question immediately traps you. Reject the premise outright.
Snuggetchamp
If the Israeli people have a right to exist and a state is merely an extension of the people, then the Israeli state has a right to exist. I agree this is a gotcha to try and trap El-Sayd but the question alone can be answered.
JustSomePersonThere
I believe therein lies the misunderstanding. A state is NOT merely an extension of the people. You might be thinking of a nation, but a state is not a nation. A state is a power structure, made for the securing of power/sovereignty over a region. You can have one without the other, easily, and often do. Examples: the Turkish people existed long before the state of Turkey came to be. The state of apartheid South Africa ceased to be, yet that did not end South Africans. No state exists by right.
Snuggetchamp
I think you're being pretty loose here. Aparthied South Africa wasn't a distinctly differnt state than South Africa. It was South Africa performing apartheid. Just the same as there was no Slaver United States. There was a United States that performed slavery.
Nation and State are often synonymous, state merely requires there to be land borders but you still need the people to exist within those borders hence why a state has to be an extension of its people. No people. No state.
bamblebimble
The Israeli people pushed out and killed the non Jews from Israel.
Frederf
nah
SquirtVonnegut
No country has the right to exist. People have rights. Countries are made up. Borders and regimes change all the time. Did Yugoslavia have the right to exist?
TheInternetHasDestroyedUs
Ok, first of all, I love your username. Secondly, you get it. So did John Lennon in the song "Imagine." Next level freedom.
Camelspotting
What are countries other than people?
Harbltron
Land? Infrastructure? Laws?
SquirtVonnegut
A legal fiction created to protect the wealthy by maintaining a monopoly on violence
Camelspotting
Humans seem to like having a legal system. But you're welcome to go live in the wilderness if you want, maybe start a commune.
Drawstencil
Rights are made up too. We have only the rights that are granted to us by the society in which we live.
crateo
I don't know why you being downvoted. There are no natural rights, just human made.
Drawstencil
There is an epidemic of ignorance in the world. 🤷
Every luxury, security, or freedom we have is due to our cooperation with others. Rights are determined at every level of governance for our allies and our enemies. Slaves had no rights, until we decided they should. Countries have only the rights afforded them by the other nations of the world. Why is the Russian invasion condemned and the Israeli invasion promoted. Ultimately it comes down to “us vs. them” and “might makes right,” or… “rights.”
Snuggetchamp
If the people willed it, absolutely. Marx and Engles were merely repeating the mantra of Confucian and Daoist philosophers when they said that a state exists as an arm and extension of its people. If people have a right to exist, then a state will form around those people.
SquirtVonnegut
That's a different question. You're speaking of self-determination, which is not reliant on the creation of a state. Countries are a fairly new concept. They are not inevitable.
Snuggetchamp
No, you're moving the goal posts. If the people will a state to exist, inevitable or not, then the state has a right to exist because the people will it. The reality remains that the state has a right to exist pursuit the will of the people.
neithermenoryou
So does every group of people get their own state in the same area? Did the jewish Europeans have a right to genocide the Palestinians living there to remove their state and replace it with their own state by force? Do the Christians living in Israel get to create their own state inside (on top of?) Israel now? Are they also allowed to genocide the jewish and Palestinian people to create their christian ethnostate? I can keep going if you want me to poke more holes into your argument
raisarevolt
Invaders get no rights. They can't exist without the expense of others.
TheGreyGryphon
We point fingers at Israel as they were the last and most recent imperial invader supportee by Britain and the US and others at the time. But most countries were imperialist invaders at some point. Si Israel can exist. It cannot genocide Palestine and keep letting settlers do heinous crimes. It should be given the same harsh penalties as Russia instead of tax dollars Americans and more bombs
neithermenoryou
Israel was only founded in living memory, comparing that to countries who founded themselves in blood generations ago is ridiculous. Every israeli IDF soldier today has blood on their hands from their own actions for helping along the ongoing genocide and the realisation of establishing Israel, and working to make the Greater Israel project a reality.
raisarevolt
Death to the idf
raisarevolt
We point fingers at Israel for being an invading force sanctioned by a lot of western nations. It has no legitimate claim, never has. They aren't imperialist invaders "at some point", they are still the same genocidal maniacs they've always been
TheGreyGryphon
Manifest destiny is libensraum is Zionism. All of it is evil and fueled by racism and greed.